Dynamic Myosin 10 coupling to DCC and β1 integrin is mediated by intrinsically disordered regions during filopodial transport and patterning

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,932 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are key mediators of protein-protein interactions. IDRs are important components of Myosin 10 (Myo10) and cargo complexes that influence neuronal development and cell growth, yet how IDRs dictate Myo10’s cargo affinity and selectivity is not fully understood. Here, we investigate how the actin motor protein Myo10 engages two distinct cargo receptors, DCC and β1 integrin, in cellular protrusions known as filopodia. Using hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS), cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS), live-cell imaging, and super-resolution microscopy, we show that Myo10 decodes IDR elements through two complementary mechanisms: disorder-to-order transitions and “fuzzy” binding. The cytoplasmic portion of DCC binds Myo10 via a weakly helical P3 motif that acts as a preformed recognition element, while additional disordered motifs contribute to affinity through dynamic, weak interactions. In contrast, the β1 integrin tail interacts with Myo10 through short NPxY motifs that remain disordered. Both cargos engage a common Myo10 surface but also contact distinct sites. Super-resolution DNA-PAINT imaging reveals distinct patterning of cargo with Myo10 along and around filopodia. Concentration measurements show that DCC is primarily bound while β1 integrin exhibits a broader range of occupancy along the filopodial shaft. Multiple additive weak contacts and a shared binding site implies that DCC can out-compete integrin for Myo10 binding, which causes redistribution of active β1 integrin from the filopodial tip to the shaft. Our findings illustrate a tunable, multivalent binding strategy that allows Myo10 to selectively coordinate diverse signaling cargos, demonstrating how regulated disorder within IDRs is one mechanism underlying cargo binding and cellular signaling. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00