Evaluation of a Chlamydia trachomatis-specific, commercial, real-time PCR for use with ocular swabs
Diagnostic accuracy
preprint
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
This study evaluated the Fast-Track Vaginal swab kit for Chlamydia trachomatis detection in ocular swabs, finding good sensitivity but lower specificity compared to reference assays.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Background Chlamydia trachomatis ( Ct ) is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection and the causative organism of trachoma, the leading infectious cause of blindness worldwide. Trachoma is diagnosed clinically by observation of conjunctival inflammation and/or scarring, however, there is evidence that monitoring Ct infection may be required for elimination programs. There are many commercial and ‘in-house’ nucleic acid amplification tests for the detection of Ct DNA, but the vast majority have not been validated for use with ocular swabs. This study evaluated a commercial assay, the Fast-Track Vaginal swab kit, using conjunctival samples from two trachoma-endemic areas. An objective, biostatistical-based method for binary classification of continuous PCR data was also developed, to limit potential user-bias in diagnostic settings. Results The Fast-Track Vaginal swab assay was run on 210 ocular swab samples from Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania. Fit of individual amplification curves to exponential or sigmoid models, derivative and second derivative of the curves and final fluorescence value were examined for utility in thresholding for determining positivity. The results from the Fast-Track Vaginal swab assay were evaluated against a commercial test (Amplicor CT/NG) as well as a non-commercial test (in-house ddPCR) both of whose performance has previously been evaluated. Significant evidence of exponential amplification (R 2 > 0.99) and final fluorescence > 0.15 were combined for thresholding. This objective approach identified a population of positive samples, however there were a subset of samples that amplified towards the end of the cycling protocol (at or later than 35 cycles), which were less clearly defined. The Fast-Track Vaginal swab assay showed good sensitivity against the commercial (95.71) and non-commercial (97.18) tests. Specificity was lower against both tests (90.00 and 96.55 respectively). Conclusions This study defined a simple, automated protocol for binary classification of continuous, real time qPCR data, for use in an end-point diagnostic test. This method identified a population of positive samples, however, as with manual thresholding, a subset of samples that amplified towards the end of the thermal cycling program were less easily classified. When used with ocular swabs, the Fast-Track Vaginal swab assay had good sensitivity but for Ct detection lower specificity than the commercial and non-commercial assays it was evaluated against, possibly leading to false positives.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00