Absorption dipole effects on MINFLUX single molecule localization

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,723 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Single molecule fluorescence localization with minimum photon flux imaging (MINFLUX) can achieve localization precisions in the small nanometer range or better under suitable conditions. Potentially adverse conditions, such as a fixed fluorescence dipole or optical aberrations, that could cause systematic localization errors, have received little attention up to now. Here, we study these effects in simulation. We find that biases occur for fluorophores with a fixed absorption dipole tilted out of the imaging plane. These become larger (up to about 25% of the diameter of the circle spanned by the doughnut center positions) the larger the tilt angle gets. As a rule of thumb the spread in bias is smaller than 5 nm in case the dipole orientation is less than 30° out of plane for the typical case of a doughnut probing circle of diameter 100 nm. For freely rotating dipoles only the primary aberrations astigmatism and coma contribute to bias. This bias depends on the position of the fluorophore inside the circular probing area of MINFLUX and can be significantly larger than the localization precision. We show that increasing the number of measurements over the circle from a triangular to a hexagonal pattern is beneficial for reducing bias in all cases. Iterative shrinking of the probing area can eliminate the position dependent bias completely, but a strong dependence on dipole orientation of the bias at the center of the probing area remains. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Correct error caption fig. 1; clarifications section 4; correct error fig. 5; expanded discussion fig. 8; added conclusion; new fig. 11; expanded discussion appendix

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00