Progress in Tubal Surgery

Robert Winston
In: Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 1981 · vol. 8(3) , pp. 653–679 · doi:10.1016/s0306-3356(21)00173-4 · PMID:7032801 · W2413256642
article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This review discusses recent advancements and ongoing challenges in tubal surgery, focusing on techniques and outcomes for various gynecological conditions.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

There is now established proof of the value of microscopic compared with conventional techniques in tubal surgery, to enable not only accurate anastomosis but also accurate dissection of adhesions to restore normal mobility and relations between tubes and ovaries. Microscopy has also highlighted the important need for adjunctive techniques such as wide exposure, careful handling of organs and peritoneum, low-power diathermy, the use of nonreactive suture material and proper peritoneal closure. All these techniques can and should always be used, not only in tubal reconstructive surgery but in all female pelvic surgery to protect the woman's future fertility. Use of the surgical microscope and details of the various tubal operations, including those for ectopic pregnancy and reversal of sterilization, have been described, together with an outline of research into future developments.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

References (51)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK