Increases in invertebrate abundance and shifts in assemblage composition following Rodent Eradication on Lord Howe Island

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,842 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Invasive species are one of the major threatening processes impacting biodiversity on islands. In particular, introduced rodents represent one of the most serious threats to island ecosystems, affecting a wide range of native plants, vertebrates and invertebrates. While nearly ubiquitous on human-modified islands, the last four decades have seen the advent of targeted rodent eradications, which have generally resulted in positive impacts for biodiversity. Invertebrates, which are crucial to the functioning of island ecosystems, are known to be negatively impacted by rodents, but their response to rodent removal is less well understood. The largest rodent eradication on an inhabited island was undertaken in 2019 on Australia’s Lord Howe Island, which successfully extirpated black rats (Rattus rattus) and house mice (Mus musculus) more than a century after their introduction. To examine the impacts of rodents on invertebrates on Lord Howe Island, we collected arboreal and terrestrial species both pre- and post-eradication and identified them to Order. Total invertebrate abundance increased after the eradication of rodents, alongside substantial shifts in assemblage composition, however Ordinal diversity did not change significantly. Orders with large increases in abundance included Isopoda and Blattodea, while the abundance of Coleoptera and Polydesmida did not change. In addition, the abundance of large invertebrates, which are presumably subject to stronger rat predation, rose dramatically following rodent eradication. Our results suggest an ecological rearrangement following the relaxation of predation pressure and augment documented evidence of improved biodiversity outcomes for forest tree species, seabirds and land birds. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00