Cognitive reserve linked to network-specific brain-ventricle coupling modes

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,643 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Despite showing significant impact in cognitive preservation, the relationship between brain activity captured with functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) in gray matter and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid dynamics remains poorly understood. We analyzed 599 fMRI scans from 163 elderly participants at rest with varying degrees of cognitive impairment employing a unified phase coupling analysis that breaks from convention by incorporating both tissue and ventricular signal fluctuations. This whole-brain approach identified distinct brain-ventricle coupling modes that differentiate between cognitive status groups and correlate with specific cognitive abilities. Beyond the previously reported anti-phase coupling between global brain signals and ventricles—which we confirm occurs more frequently in cognitively normal controls—our analysis method uncovered additional coupling modes where signals in specific brain networks temporarily align with ventricle signals. At the cortical level, these modes reveal patterns corresponding to known resting-state networks: one overlapping with the Default Mode Network occurs significantly less frequently in Alzheimer’s Disease patients, while another revealing the Frontoparietal Network correlates positively with memory scores. Our findings demonstrate that different brain-ventricle coupling modes correlate with specific cognitive domains, with particular modes predicting memory, executive function, and visuospatial abilities. The coupling between signals in brain ventricles and established resting-state networks challenges our current understanding of functional network formation, suggesting an integral link with brain fluid motion. This reconceptualization of brain dynamics through the lens of fluid-tissue interactions establishes a fundamental physical basis for cognitive preservation, suggesting that therapeutic interventions targeting these interactions may prove more effective than approaches focused solely on cellular or molecular mechanisms. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes ↵+ Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (adni.loni.usc.edu). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf Minor changes; author list updated; figure 7 revised

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00