MR hysterosalpingography in a rabbit model
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
MR hysterosalpingography showed high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing fallopian tube patency in rabbits, comparable to conventional HSG.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of MR imaging as compared with conventional hysterosalpingography (HSG) for the detection of fallopian tube patency after uterine injection of contrast material. Rabbit uterine horns (n= 18) were catheterized transvaginally. Five fallopian tubes were ligated and 11 were left unaltered. T1-weighted gradient-echo MR images were obtained before, during, and after injection of 1.0-3.0 mL of a dilute gadolinium-containing contrast agent. Corresponding conventional studies were performed with an equivalent volume of iohexol. Images were evaluated by two blinded readers. Observers agreed in all cases on the presence (n = 11) or absence (n = 5) of peritoneal spill with conventional HSG. Interpretation of MR HSG concurred with conventional HSG in 14 of 16 cases for each observer (P > .05). Reasons for misdiagnosis included small amounts of spill (n = 2), artifact (n = 1), and subtle spill between bowel loops (n = 1). Sensitivity and specificity for MR HSG were 95.5% and 70%, respectively, for the diagnosis of tubal patency/occlusions. No statistical difference was found between MR HSG and conventional HSG for the diagnosis of fallopian tube patency/obstruction. Potential advantages of MR HSG include no ionizing radiation, potentially diminished local contrast toxicity, superior visualization of uterine fibroids and endometriosis, and visualization of ovaries. We conclude that this technique warrants further study, including the use of a primate model to better simulate human anatomy.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (18)
- Diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: fat-suppressed T1-weighted vs conventional MR images. via openalex
- Efficacy of hysterosalpingography in evaluating endometriosis via openalex
- Infertility in women: diagnostic evaluation with hysterosalpingography and other imaging techniques. via openalex
- Pelvic endometriosis: detection and diagnosis with chemical shift MR imaging. via openalex
- The current state of hysterosalpingography. via openalex
- The potential value of magnetic resonance imaging in infertility via openalex
- W2020754166 via openalex
- W2023362983 via openalex
- W2029682324 via openalex
- W1993206667 via openalex
- W2053480371 via openalex
- W2058552326 via openalex
- W2071140278 via openalex
- W2077659130 via openalex
- W1985788490 via openalex
- W2009593850 via openalex
- W2462932314 via openalex
- W1993508802 via openalex
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-13T06:22:48.782012+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:02.671803+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK