Neurotranscriptomic signatures of natural variation in mate preference learning in two subspecies of Heliconius melpomene butterflies

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-17

This study identified transcriptomic differences in the brains and sensory tissues of *Heliconius melpomene* subspecies, revealing genetic underpinnings for variation in mate-preference learning and suggesting conserved learning pathways.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-15 · read from full text

This study investigates the transcriptomic basis for natural variation in mate preference learning between two subspecies of Heliconius melpomene butterflies. Researchers compared neural and sensory tissue profiles in H. m. malleti males, which learn to decrease courtship after failed copulation, and H. m. rosina males, which do not exhibit this behavioral plasticity. The analysis revealed that while baseline transcriptomes differ, the most significant divergence associated with learning capability occurs in the brain, followed by sensory tissues, implicating conserved learning pathways and multimodal sensory processing genes. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Many animals change their behavior in response to social experiences by learning. Although social learning is adaptive, not all individuals learn. In Heliconius melpomene, H. m. malleti males respond to 2-day prior failed copulation experience by decreasing courtship, whereas H. m. rosina males do not. Here, we explore the transcriptomic differences in both the neural (brain) and sensory (eyes, antennae) tissues underlying this natural diversity in male aversive mate-preference learning. While the transcriptomic profiles of the two subspecies are inherently different across all three tissues, we found the greatest difference between the good ( H. m. malleti ), and bad ( H. m. rosina ) mate-preference learners in the brain, followed by the sensory tissues. Known learning genes and Gene Ontology terms were associated with differences in mate-preference learning, suggesting conserved learning pathways across animals. Genes within putative magic loci associated with colors, odors, and locomotion, were also differentially expressed between H. m. malleti and H. m. rosina, suggesting multimodal sensory processing may drive behavioral variance in these two subspecies. Overall, our study identifies genetic underpinnings for differences in preference learning, both in neural processing and sensory tissues. Selection on these genes/networks could result in preference learning-induced reinforcement, leading to reproductive isolation and speciation.
Full text 1,543 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Many animals change their behavior in response to social experiences by learning. Although social learning is adaptive, not all individuals learn. In Heliconius melpomene, H. m. malleti males respond to 2-day prior failed copulation experience by decreasing courtship, whereas H. m. rosina males do not. Here, we explore the transcriptomic differences in both the neural (brain) and sensory (eyes, antennae) tissues underlying this natural diversity in male aversive mate-preference learning. While the transcriptomic profiles of the two subspecies are inherently different across all three tissues, we found the greatest difference between the good (H. m. malleti), and bad (H. m. rosina) mate-preference learners in the brain, followed by the sensory tissues. Known learning genes and Gene Ontology terms were associated with differences in mate-preference learning, suggesting conserved learning pathways across animals. Genes within putative magic loci associated with colors, odors, and locomotion, were also differentially expressed between H. m. malleti and H. m. rosina, suggesting multimodal sensory processing may drive behavioral variance in these two subspecies. Overall, our study identifies genetic underpinnings for differences in preference learning, both in neural processing and sensory tissues. Selection on these genes/networks could result in preference learning-induced reinforcement, leading to reproductive isolation and speciation. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00