Wnt/LRP6 signaling imbalance impairs ciliogenesis in human retina epithelial cells

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 76,053 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Wnt/LRP6 signaling imbalance impairs ciliogenesis in human retina epithelial cells | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Wnt/LRP6 signaling imbalance impairs ciliogenesis in human retina epithelial cells Cheng Yuan , Ayushi Branushali , Matias Simons , Sergio P. Acebrón , Gislene Pereira doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.10.632335 Cheng Yuan 1 Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), Cytoskeleton, Cell Division and Signal transduction Unit, University of Heidelberg , Heidelberg, Germany 2 German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Molecular Biology of Centrosome and Cilia Unit, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance , Heidelberg, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Ayushi Branushali 3 Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), Cell Signalling Unit, University of Heidelberg , Heidelberg, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Matias Simons 4 Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg , Heidelberg, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Sergio P. Acebrón 3 Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), Cell Signalling Unit, University of Heidelberg , Heidelberg, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Gislene Pereira 1 Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), Cytoskeleton, Cell Division and Signal transduction Unit, University of Heidelberg , Heidelberg, Germany 2 German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Molecular Biology of Centrosome and Cilia Unit, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance , Heidelberg, Germany 5 Centre for Molecular Biology (ZMBH), University of Heidelberg , Heidelberg, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: gislene.pereira{at}cos.uni-heidelberg.de g.pereira{at}dkfz.de Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Preview PDF Abstract The primary cilium is a microtubule-based organelle essential for various cellular functions, particularly signal transduction. While the role of cilia in regulating signaling pathways has been extensively studied, the impact of signaling pathways on cilia formation remains less well understood. Wnt signals are critical modulators of cell fate. In this study, we investigate how modulating Wnt signaling affects cilia formation in human retinal epithelial cells. Our findings show that enhancement of Wnt/LRP6 signaling before serum starvation impairs ciliogenesis. Cells with high baseline Wnt activity exhibited defective distal appendage formation, failure to remove CP110/CEP97 from mother centrioles, and reduced Rab8-vesicular docking, which are critical events for cilia membrane establishment and axoneme extension. Additionally, these cells displayed reduced autophagic flux, increased mTOR kinase activity, and elevated OFD1 levels at centriolar satellites. Importantly, mTOR inhibition rescued ciliogenesis in cells with elevated Wnt activity, underscoring the interplay between these signaling pathways. Our data also indicate that insufficient Wnt signaling activation disrupts ciliogenesis, emphasizing the need for precisely regulated Wnt levels. Summary This study investigates how modulating Wnt signaling affects ciliogenesis in human retinal epithelial cells, revealing that both excessive and insufficient Wnt activity disrupt cilia formation and highlighting the interplay between Wnt and mTOR signaling in this process. Introduction Primary cilia are microtubule-based organelles that in vertebrate cells serve as key signaling hubs for signal transduction pathways, including Hedgehog, Hippo, TGF-β, Notch and Wnt, among others ( Mill et al , 2023 ). Dysfunctional primary cilia can lead to a group of pleiotropic developmental and degenerative diseases collectively known as ciliopathies. These disorders exhibit a broad range of clinical manifestations, such as skeletal and brain malformations, obesity, retinal degeneration and polycystic kidneys ( Reiter & Leroux, 2017 ). Cilia biogenesis begins at the mother centriole of the centrosome, which convergs into the basal body of the cilium during the G1/G0 phase of the cell cycle ( Vorobjev & Chentsov Yu, 1982 ). Cilia initiation involves the coordination of cytoskeleton rearrangements, membrane trafficking to the centrosome and degradation of cilia inhibitory components to facilitate ciliary membrane formation and axonemal microtubule extension starting from the basal body ( Sanchez & Dynlacht, 2016 ). Key to this process are distal appendage components, which constitute a group of proteins that interact at the distal end of the mother centriole. They are essential for the docking of ciliary vesicles at the mother centriole by activating Rab-family GTPases, notably the Rab11-Rab8 cascade ( Ma et al , 2023 ; Sanchez & Dynlacht, 2016 ). Additionally, distal appendages play a key role in the removal of the CP110-CEP97 inhibitory complex, which caps the end of the mother centriole, thereby preventing vesicle fusion and inhibiting ciliary growth ( Spektor et al , 2007 ; Xie et al , 2024 ). Furthermore, distal appendages also promote axonemal microtubule extension by recruiting intraflagellar transport (IFT) protein complexes necessary for cilia growth ( Kobayashi & Dynlacht, 2011 ; Kumar & Reiter, 2021 ; Schmidt et al , 2012 ; Tanos et al , 2013 ; Zhao et al , 2023 ). Centriolar satellites are additional key regulators of ciliogenesis ( Devi et al , 2021 ; Tischer et al , 2021 ). These membrane-less granules control the transport of centrosomal and cilia-related proteins, as well as regulatory components like E3- ubiquitin ligases, to the pericentriolar area via microtubules ( Devi et al ., 2021 ; Kubo et al , 1999 ; Tischer et al ., 2021 ). Many satellite components, such as the scaffolding protein PCM1 or WDR8, act as positive regulators of ciliogenesis and are required for the removal of the CP110-CEP97 complex and cilia vesicle establishment at the mother centriole ( Begar et al , 2024 ; Hall et al , 2023 ; Kurtulmus et al , 2016 ). However, the ciliopathy-related protein OFD1 localizes at centrioles but also at centriolar satellites, were it inhibits ciliogenesis by preventing the centrosomal recruitment of BBS4, an intraflagellar transport protein essential for cilia biogenesis ( Tang et al , 2013 ). Notably, OFD1 is removed from centriolar satellites by autophagy during early steps of cilia formation ( Tang et al ., 2013 ). Wnt (Wingless-related integration site) is a highly conserved signaling pathway that governs various cellular processes, such as embryonic development, tissue regeneration, and cell fate determination ( Nusse & Clevers, 2017 ; Rim et al , 2022 ). The Wnt/β-catenin pathway, ofter termed as canonical, is activated by Frizzled (FZD) receptors and low-density-lipoprotein receptor related 5 or 6 (LRP5/6) co-receptors. Binding of Wnt ligands to FZD-LRP5/6, results in receptor clustering on Dishevelled (DVL) platforms termed LRP6 signalosomes, and subsequent phosphorylation of LRP6 by GSK3β and CK1γ ( Bilic et al , 2007 ; Cruciat et al , 2010 ; Davidson et al , 2005 ; Zeng et al , 2005 ). LRP6 signalosomes recruit the β-catenin destruction complex, which contains the scaffold proteins AXIN1 and adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), the kinases CK1α and GSK3β, and the E3-ubiquitin ligase β-TrCP ( Stamos & Weis, 2013 ). LRP6 signalosomes can mature into multivesicular bodies, sequestering the Wnt receptors together with GSK3β for long-term signalling ( Taelman et al , 2010 ). The best-established output of Wnt/LRP6 signalling is the stabilisation of cytoplasmic β- catenin, which translocates to the nucleus and interacts with members of TCF family of transcription factors to activate the transcription of target genes ( Behrens et al , 1996 ; Cadigan & Waterman, 2012 ). In addition to the β-catenin programme, Wnt/LRP6 signalling modulates or stabilises many other GSK3 target proteins ( Acebron & Niehrs, 2016 ). For example, GSK3 phosphorylation of target proteins is able to generate phospho-degrons that can be recognized by specific E3-ubiquitin ligases, leading to protein degradation ( Acebron et al , 2014 ; Acebron & Niehrs, 2016 ; Hinze et al , 2019 ). Wnt-dependent stabilization of proteins (Wnt/STOP) reduces protein degradation by inhibiting GSK3, thereby inducing cell growth, notably during mitosis ( Acebron et al ., 2014 ; Habib & Acebron, 2022 ). Wnt/LRP6 signalling can also promote cell growth via mTOR (Wnt/mTOR) by preventing the GSK3-dependent phosphorylation and activation of the TORC1 inhitor TSC2 ( Inoki et al , 2006 ). Canonical Wnt signaling have been implicated in ciliogenesis, although results have been inconsistent. For instance, Wnt activation enhances ciliogenesis in some contexts, it inhibits or has no influence in others ( Bernatik et al , 2021 ; Kyun et al , 2020 ; Nakagawa et al , 2017 ; Zhang et al , 2015 ; Zhang et al , 2023 ). Here, we show that enhancing Wnt/LRP6 signaling in human retinal epithelial (RPE1) cells prior to serum starvation impairs the removal of cilia inhibitory components, including CP110/CEP97 complex and OFD1 at centriolar satellites. Both ectopic removal of OFD1 and chemical inhibition of mTOR rescued ciliogenesis in cells with higher baseline Wnt activity, highlighting the contribution of Wnt/mTOR to cilia formation. We propose that while Wnt is necessary for cilia formation, any imbalance leading to lower or higher baseline Wnt activity compromises ciliogenesis. Results Disruption of baseline Wnt activity impairs cilia formation in RPE1 cells Although non-transformed RPE1 cells exhibit non-induced, basal Wnt/β-catenin activity ( Bernatik et al ., 2021 ; Kyun et al ., 2020 ; Stolz et al , 2015 ), which has been linked to ciliogenesis, the consequences of blocking or activating Wnt signaling for cilia formation in these cells remain unclear ( Bernatik et al ., 2021 ; Kyun et al ., 2020 ; Zhang et al ., 2023 ). To address the importance of this basal Wnt signaling for ciliogenesis, we depleted endogenous LRP5/6 and β-catenin using siRNA treatment prior to cilia induction by serum deprivation. Compared to mock depletion (siLUC), depletion of LRP5/6 or β-catenin significantly decreased ciliogenesis by 50-30% ( Fig. 1A , 1B), indicating that basal Wnt/β-catenin activity in RPE1 cells is required for cilia formation, as previously suggested ( Kyun et al ., 2020 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Changes in baseline WNT activity impairs cilia formation in RPE1 cells (A-B) Quantification of ciliation of RPE1 cells treated with control (siLUC) and LPR6 (A) or β-catenin (B, CTNNB1) siRNA and serum starved for 24 h prior to fixation and staining with γ-tubulin (basal body marker) and ARL13b (cilia membrane marker). The bar graph indicates mean +/- S.D. from three independent experiments. (A) siLUC, n=561; siLRP6, n=339; (B) siLUC, n=312; siCTNNB1, n=647. (C) Experimental scheme for cilia induction and treatment of cells with Wnt agonist. (D) RPE1 cells were treated as described in (C) and subjected to immunofluorescence analysis 16 h after serum starvation. The bar graph indicates the percentages (mean +/- S.D.) of ciliated cells treated with Co-CM and Wnt3a-CM from three independent experiments. Serum starved cells without treatment (serum free) were used as a control. The images show representative ciliated and non-ciliated cells with enlarged views of the centrosomal area. Basal bodies (γ-tubulin, red), ciliary membrane (ARL13b, green) and DNA (DAPI staining, blue) are shown as single channels or merged. Scale bar, 5 μm. (E-F) RPE1 cells were treated as described in (C) and stained with Rb and phospho-Rb (pRb; S807/S811) antibodies 16 h after serum-starvation. Representative images (E) and quantifications of the percentage of non-proliferating cells (pRb negative) (F) are shown. Co-CM, n=638; Wnt3a-CM, n=876. The bar graph indicates the mean +/- S.D. from three independent experiments. Scale bar, 10 μm. (G) Quantification of ciliation in RPE1 cells treated with buffer control (n=561) or purified surrogate Wnt agonist (n=639) after 16 h of serum starvation. The bar graph indicates the mean +/- S.D. from three independent experiments. (H) Quantification of ciliation after 16 h of serum starvation in RPE1 7xTGC cells expressing DKK1 alone or in combination with WNT1 . Empty plasmids were used as control. The bar graph indicates the mean +/- S.D. from three independent experiments. Control, n=559; DKK1, n=597; Wnt1, n=553; Wnt1+DKK1, n=612. P values are based on Student’s t-test analysis. Next, we sought to explore the impact of raising baseline Wnt activity for cilia formation. For this, we constructed RPE1 cells stably carrying the 7xTGC Wnt reporter construct, which carries GFP under control of the Wnt Tcf responsive promoter in addition to mCherry under the constitute SV40 promoter ( Fuerer & Nusse, 2010 ). In the absence of Wnt signalling, only mCherry expression was observed. The addition of Wnt3a-conditioned media (Wnt3a-CM), but not control-conditioned media (Co-CM), resulted in an increased number of cells exhibiting high GFP-Wnt signal reporter activity within 6 hours of Wnt3a-CM treatment (Fig. S1A). Based on these data, RPE1 cells were treated with Co-CM or Wnt3a-CM six hours prior to serum starvation to increase Wnt baseline activity. The same treatment was repeated at the time of serum starvation to maintain Wnt activity throughout ciliogenesis, as depicted in Fig. 1C . We confirmed that Wnt signaling remained active even after 16 h of serum starvation by determining the levels of β-catenin, which increased as a consequence of β-catenin stabilization (Fig. S1B). In comparison to Co-CM, Wnt3a-CM treatment significantly reduced ciliation in RPE1 cells by 60% ( Fig. 1D ). This inhibitory effect was still observed after 30 h in serum-free medium, yet not as pronounced as at earlier time points (Fig. S1C). At later time points (54 h), no significant difference was observed, suggesting a delay rather than a completely block of ciliogenesis as a consequence of increased Wnt baseline activity. Importantly, DNA-content analysis by FACS indicated that both Co-CM and Wnt3a-CM treated cells were similarly arrested in the G1/G0 phase of the cell cycle (Fig. S1D). In addition, the levels of phosphorylated Rb protein (S807/811), a marker for proliferating cells ( Henley & Dick, 2012 ), was equally reduced in both Co-CM and Wnt3a-CM samples ( Fig. 1E , 1F), indicating that the negative effect of Wnt activation on ciliogenesis was not due to the inability of the cells to arrest at the G1/G0 phase of the cell cycle upon serum starvation. We also conducted a similar analysis using additional cell lines. We observed that Wnt overactivation also impaired cilia formation in murine fibroblasts (NIH3T3, Fig. S1E) and murine inner medullar kidney tubular (IMCD3) cells (Fig. S1F). Together, these data show that enhancing activation of Wnt signaling delays ciliogenesis in human and murine cells. Wnt ligands, such as Wnt3a and Wnt1, activate the Wnt pathway through the dimerization of the Wnt receptor FZD and its co-receptors LRP5/LRP6 ( Nusse & Clevers, 2017 ). This activation step is counteracted by the Dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK1), which inhibits the association of Wnt ligand to LRP receptors ( Niehrs, 2006 ). To address whether the effect of Wnt on ciliogenesis requires FZD-LRP5/6, we first made use of a recombinant surrogate Wnt agonist, which induces heterodimerisation of FZD and LRP5 or LRP6 and hence Wnt activation, which can be suppressed by addition of DKK1 (Fig. S1G) ( Janda et al , 2017 ). Adding purified recombinant Wnt surrogate to RPE1 cells was able to activate the Wnt pathway, as determined by appearance of GFP positive cells using the report assay (Fig. S1H). Similar to Wnt3a- CM, recombinant Wnt surrogate significantly diminished the percentage of ciliated cells in RPE1 cells after 16 h of serum starvation ( Fig. 1G ). In a parallel assay, expression of WNT1 , which activates Wnt/LRP signaling in RPE1 cells, also decreased the percentage of ciliated cells and this effect was counteracted by co-transfection of DKK1 ( Fig. 1H ). These data collectively indicate that high basal levels of Wnt signaling negatively affect ciliogenesis. Wnt overactivation delays cilia formation independently of TCF7 To test whether Wnt pathway overactivation influences ciliogenesis via TCF/LEF- dependent transcriptional regulation, we investigated whether TCF7 is required for ciliogenesis. First, we verified that in the vast majority of RPE1 cells (>99%), TCF7 accumulated in the nucleus upon Wnt3a addition ( Fig. 2A ), confirming TCF7 responsiveness to Wnt. We next depleted TCF7 using small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) before exposing the cells to Co-CM or Wnt3a-CM ( Fig. 2B and 2C ). In the presence or absence of TCF7, Wnt3a-CM increased the amount of slow-migrating, hyperphosphorylated forms of DVL2, which serves as a marker for Wnt activation ( Fig. 2B , lanes 2 and 4) ( Gonzalez-Sancho et al , 2004 ). Interestingly, Wnt3a-CM similarly impaired cilia formation irrespective of the presence of TCF7 ( Fig. 2B and 2C ), suggesting that TCF7 is not required for the negative effect of Wnt overactivation on ciliogenesis. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Increasing baseline WNT activity delays cilia formation independently of TCF7 (A) Immunofluorescence images showing the localization of TCF7 (green) in Co-CM and Wnt3a-CM treated RPE1 cells as depicted in 1C. γ-tubulin (red) and DAPI (blue) serve as markers for centrosomes and nuclei, respectively. Scale bar, 5μm. (B-C) RPE1 cells incubated with control (siLUC) or TCF7 siRNAs were treated with Co-CM or Wnt3a-CM as depicted in 1C and analyzed 16 h after serum starvation. (B) Western blot analysis of saponin lysed RPE1 cells using DVL2 and TCF7 antibodies. Actin served as a loading control. The asterisk marks the phosphorylated form of DVL2. (C) Quantification of the percentage of ciliated cells based on γ-tubulin and ARL13b staining. The bar graph indicates the the mean +/- S.D. of three independent experiments. siLUC+Co-CM, n=338; siLUC+Wnt3a-CM, n=325; siTCF7+Co-CM, n=336; siTCF7+Wnt3a-CM, n=322. P values are based on Student’s t-test analysis. Wnt signaling activation decreases the recruitment of RAB8a to basal bodies GSK3 was shown to promote ciliary membrane extension in a RAB8a-dependent manner ( Zhang et al ., 2015 ). Indeed, the inhibition of GSK3 in RPE1 cells with either BIO or CHIR99021, two GSK3 specific inhibitors, significantly suppressed cilia formation (Fig. S2A, 3A) and the accumulation of RAB8a around centrosomes ( Fig. 3B ). The few cells that were still able to form cilia upon GSK3 inhibition had significantly longer cilia in comparison to wild type cells ( Fig. 3C ), supporting the previously reported influence of Wnt activation on cilia length ( Kyun et al ., 2020 ). We next asked whether Wnt3a-CM treatment phenocopied GSK3 inactivation in impairing RAB8a-vesicular trafficking to the centrosome. To investigate this, we used an established RPE1 cell line stably expressing GFP-RAB8a ( Schmidt et al ., 2012 ). Whereas GFP-RAB8a accumulated around centrosomes shortly after serum starvation in control cells, the number of GFP-RAB8a-positive centrosomes significantly reduced in Wnt3a-CM treated cells ( Fig. 3D ). Since RAB8a is transported to the centrosome in a microtubule-dependent manner ( Knodler et al , 2010 ; Westlake et al , 2011 ), we asked whether the microtubule-dependent trafficking of proteins to the centrosome was generally disturbed upon Wnt activation. However, this was not the case, as the levels of the centriolar satellite protein PCM1, which accumulates around centrosomes via microtubule-based transport ( Kubo et al ., 1999 ), did not differ upon Wnt3a treatment (Fig. S2B). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. WNT signaling decreases the recruitment of RAB8a to basal bodies (A) RPE1 cells were serum starved for 16 h in the presence of solvent control (DMSO), BIO or CHIR99021. Cells were processed for immunofluorescence analysis using γ- tubulin and ARL13b antibodies. DNA was stained with DAPI. The bar graph shows the percentage of ciliated cells (mean +/- S.D.) of three independent experiments. DMSO, n=449; BIO, n=497; CHIR99021, n=391. (B) RPE1 cells stably expressing GFP-RAB8a were treated with CHIR99021 as described in (A). GFP-RAB8a was detected by direct fluorescence. The graph shows the percentage of non-ciliated cells with GFP-RAB8a docked at centrosomes (stained with γ-tubulin antibodies). DNA was stained with DAPI. The mean +/- S.D. ofthree independent experiments is shown. Representative images with enlarged centrosomal areas (as indicated) show merged γ-tubulin and GFP-RAB8a (top panel), γ-tubulin (grey, middle panel) and GFP-RAB8a (red, lower panel) in control (DMSO) and CHIR99021 treated cells. DMSO, n=561; CHIR99021, n=396. Scale bar: 5 µm. (C) Quanfitication of ciliary length from (A). Representative images show basal body (γ-tubulin, red) and ciliary membrane (ARLB13b, green) merged signals. The box/dot plots show quantification of ciliary length from three independent experiment. Control, n=99; BIO, n=68; CHIR99021, n=99. Scale Bar, 5 μm. (D) RPE1 cells stably expressing GFP-RAB8a were treated with Co-CM and Wnt3a- CM as depicted in 1C and fixed for GFP-RAB8a localization analysis as described in (B). Quantifications and representative images are shown. Enlarged images show merged γ-tubulin (red) and GFP-RAB8a (green) signals (top panel). DNA was stained with DAPI. Co-CM, n=216; Wnt3a-CM, n=306. Scale bar, 5 μm. (E) Cartoons representing daughter and mother centrioles with distal (DAs) and subdistal (SDAs) appendages and components analyzed. RAB8a-positive vesicles (yellow) docks at the mother centriole at initial steps of ciliogenesis prior to extension of the axoneme (green). (F) RPE1 cells were treated as depicted in 1C and stained for ODF2 (SDA component, green) and γ-tubulin (red). The box/dot plots show quantification of fluorescence intensities of ODF2 at the centrosomes from three independent experiments. Representative images are shown on the right. DNA was stained with DAPI (blue). Co- CM, n=144; Wnt3a-CM, n=131. Scale bar, 10 μm. (G-H) RPE1 cells were treated with DMSO control or CHIR99021 and serum starved for 16 h prior to immunofluorescence analysis for CEP164 and CHIBBY. The box/dot plots show quantification of fluorescence intensities of CEP164 (G) and CHIBBY (H) at the centrosomes from three independent experiments. Representative images with enlargements of the centrosomal area are shown on the right. DNA was stained with DAPI (blue). (G) Co-CM, n=110; CHIR99021, n=111. (H) Co-CM, n=91; CHIR99021, n=98. Scale bar, 10 μm. P values are based on Student’s t-test analysis. A.U., arbitrary units. RAB8a-vesicle docking at mother centrioles requires distal appendage proteins ( Fig. 3E ) ( Schmidt et al ., 2012 ; Sillibourne et al , 2013 ; Tanos et al ., 2013 ). To investigate whether Wnt activation negatively influenced appendage formation, we compared the levels of distal appendage proteins at the basal body in Co-CM and Wnt3a-CM treated cells. No significant decrease in protein levels was observed for the distal appendage components CEP164, TTBK2, CEP83, or CHIBBY (Fig. S2C-S2F). The level of the subdistal component ODF2 at centrioles also remained unchanged following Wnt3a-CM treatment ( Fig. 3F ). However, the levels of CEP164 and CHIBBY were clearly decreased in GSK3-inhibited RPE1 cells compared to untreated cells ( Fig. 3G , 3H), suggesting a role of GSK3 kinase in appendage integrity or assembly. Collectivelly, the data indicate that early steps of ciliogenesis are blocked under high Wnt activity. Wnt signaling activation impairs the removal of the cilia inhibitory proteins CP110 and OFD1 An important step that occurs before ciliary membrane and axoneme extension is the downregulation of cilia-inhibitory components, including the protein complex CP110- CEP97 and the cytoplasmic pool of the protein OFD1 ( Sanchez & Dynlacht, 2016 ; Spektor et al ., 2007 ; Tang et al ., 2013 ). To test whether CP110/CEP97 or OFD1 regulation was impaired by Wnt overactivation, we first examined the centriolar pool of CP110 as a representative of the CP110/CEP97 complex. CP110 is present at both mother and daughter centrioles but it is removed from the mother centriole prior to axoneme extension ( Spektor et al ., 2007 ). In Co-CM samples, CP110 was absent from the majority of the mother centrioles, labelled by the subdistal appendage component ODF2 ( Fig. 4A ). In contrast, the percentage of mother centrioles associated with CP110 was significantly higher after Wnt3a-CM treatment ( Fig. 4A ), indicating that cilia formation is blocked prior to CP110/CEP97 removal. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4. Wnt signaling activation impairs the removal of the cilia inhibitory proteins CP110 and OFD1 (A) RPE1 cells were treated as depicted in 1C and stained for CP110 (green), ODF2 (red) and γ-tubulin (grey). The graph shows the percentage of mother centrioles (marked by ODF2) with or without CP110. Mean +/- S.D. of three independent experiments are shown. Representative images with enlargements of the centrosomal area as depicted are shown on the right. Co-CM, n=455; Wnt3a-CM, n=390. DNA was stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 5 μm. (B) RPE1 cells were treated as depicted in 1C and stained for OFD1 (green) and γ- tubulin (red) after 16 h of serum starvation. Representative images show OFD1 localization in Co-CM or Wnt3a-CM treated cells. DNA was stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 20 μm. (C) Quantification of the cytoplasmic centriolar satellite OFD1 signal of (B) in arbitrary units. Co-CM, n=480; Wnt3a-CM, n=430. (D) RPE1 cells incubated with control (siLUC) or CP110 siRNAs were treated with Co-CM or Wnt3a-CM as depicted in 1C and analyzed by immunofluorescence 16 h after serum starvation. The bar graph indicates the percentage of ciliated cells (mean +/- S.D.) from three independent experiments. siLUC+Co-CM, n=436; siLUC+Wnt3a- CM, n=393; siCP110+Co-CM, n=235; siCP110+Wnt3a-CM, n=338. (E) Representative images of (D). Cells were stained with acetylated tubulin (Ace- tubulin, grey), OFD2 (mother centriole marker, red), CP110 (green). Enlargements are shown on the right. Scale bar, 5 μm. (F) RPE1 cells incubated with control (siLUC) or OFD1 siRNAs were treated with Co- CM or Wnt3a-CM as depicted in 1C and analyzed by immunofluorescence 16 h after serum starvation. The bar graph shows the percentage of ciliated cells (mean +/- S.D.) from three independent experiments. siLUC+Co-CM, n=690; siLUC+Wnt3a-CM, n=677.siOFD1: Co-CM, n=521. siOFD1: Wnt3a-CM, n=509. (G) Western blot analysis of (F) showing the levels of phospho-LRP6 (p-LRP6), OFD1 (marked by an asterisk) and TCF7 in the indicated samples serum starved for 16 h. Actin served as a loading control. P values are based on Student’s t-test analysis. Next, we examined the centriolar satellite pool of OFD1, which is present at the cytoplasma and is degraded during early stages of ciliation ( Tang et al ., 2013 ), and found that it was increased in Wnt3a-CM cells compared to controls ( Fig. 4B , 4C). These data suggest that satellite-bound OFD1 is not efficiently removed in Wnt- stimulated cells, preventing axoneme assembly. Removal of OFD1 but not CP110 restores ciliogenesis in Wnt activated cells We reasoned that if the inhibition of cilia formation upon Wnt activation is caused by the persistent presence of CP110-CEP97 or OFD1, inducing their degradation should restore ciliogenesis in Wnt-stimulated cells. To test this, we used siRNA treatment to deplete CP110 or OFD1 levels before inducing ciliogenesis and applying Wnt3a-CM treatment. The depletion of CP110 did not change the effect of Wnt3a on ciliogenesis ( Fig. 4D , 4E). In constrast, OFD1 depletion significantly increased the percentage of ciliated cells in Wnt3a-CM treated samples ( Fig. 4F - 4G ). The knockdown of OFD1 also increased ciliogenesis in Co-CM treated cells ( Fig. 4F ), which is consistent with data showing that removal of OFD1 promotes ciliogenesis in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) ( Tang et al ., 2013 ). Importantly, Wnt activation was not impaired after OFD1 depletion, as determined by phosphorylation of LRP6 and increased TCF7 protein levels ( Fig. 4G ). Interestingly, while OFD1 depletion under Co-CM conditions resulted in approximately 1.5-fold increase in cilia formation, this increase was amplified to 2.8-fold when the Wnt pathway was activated with Wnt3a-CM. Moreover, the overall cilia formation observed in response to OFD1 depletion remained similar across conditions. These findings suggest that the failure to remove OFD1 is a key factor contributing to reduced cilia formation during Wnt pathway hyperactivation. Inhibition of mTOR signaling rescues cilia formation in Wnt activated cells Given that Wnt3a functioned independently of TCF7 in ciliogenesis ( Fig. 2 ), we next asked how activated Wnt/LRP6 signaling impairs cilia formation by exploring Wnt/STOP and Wnt/mTOR cascades ( Evangelisti et al , 2020 ; Inoki et al ., 2006 ). Of note, mTOR activity reduces autophagy ( Deleyto-Seldas & Efeyan, 2021 ; Panwar et al , 2023 ), which is related to ciliogenesis through OFD1 downregulation ( Tang et al ., 2013 ). To estimate whether the autophagic flux was indeed decreased in cells treated with Wnt3a-CM, we performed imaging analysis using RPE1 cells stably expressing the microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3) fused to mCherry and GFP (mCherry-GFP-LC3 reporter) ( Kimura et al , 2007 ; Pankiv et al , 2007 ). The mCherry- GFP-LC3 fusion protein gives a green and red signal at autophagosomes but only a red signal is detected at autolysosomes, due to the instability of GFP at acidic pH ( Kimura et al ., 2007 ; Pankiv et al ., 2007 ). To quantify the number of autophagosomes, we counted the yellow foci per cell, representing co-localized mCherry and GFP signals (mCherry + GFP + puncta). In comparison to Co-CM, the number of mCherry + GFP + puncta in Wnt3a-CM treated cells was significantly decreased ( Fig. 5A , 5B). This indicates a reduction in autophagosome formation following Wnt overactivation in serum starved cells. We next determined mTOR activity in our conditions by looking at the phosphorylation levels of the mTOR substrate, the ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K), using a phospho-specific S6K(pT389) antibody. Phosphorylation of S6K markedly increased in Wnt3a-CM ( Fig. 5C , lane 3) in comparison to control ( Fig 5C , lane 1). This effect was due to mTOR activity, as S6K phosphorylation was blocked by the mTOR inhibitor, rapamycin ( Fig 5C , lanes 2 and 4). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 5. Inhibition of mTOR signaling rescues cilia formation in Wnt activated cells (A-B) RPE1 cells stably expressing mCherry-GFP-LC3 were treated with Co-CM and Wnt3a-CM as depicted in 1C and fixed 16 h after serum starvation for direct fluorescence analysis of mCherry and GFP signals. Representative images (A) and quantification of the number of GFP + mCherry + foci (yellow dots, autophagosomes) (B) from three independent experiments are shown. Co-CM, n=123; Wnt3a-CM, n=113. Scale bar: 10 µm. (C) RPE1 cells were treated as depicted in 1C in the presence or absence of rapamycin and analyzed by western blot 16 h after serum starvation using phospho-S6K (T389) and S6K antibodies. Actin served as a loading control. DMSO was used as a solvent control. (D) RPE1 cells were treated as depicted in 1C in the presence of solvent control (DMSO) or rapamycin and analyzed by immunofluorescece 16 h after serum starvation. The bar graph shows the percentage of ciliated cells from three independent experiments.DMSO+Co-CM, n=394, DMSO+Rapamycin, n=361; DMSO+Wnt3a-CM, n=468; Rapamycin+Wnt3a-CM, n=372. P values are based on t-test analysis. (E) Wnt hyperactivation prior to ciliogenesis affects mTORC1 activity and the removal of OFD1 from centriolar satellites, thereby impairing cilia formation. Created with BioRender. (F) Perturbations that decrease or increase basal Wnt activity in RPE1 cells negatively influence the ability of cells to ciliate. Created with BioRender. P values are based on Student’s t-test analysis. A control to differentiate between Wnt/STOP and Wnt/mTOR is to asses the dependency of the effects to rapamycin ( Acebron & Niehrs, 2016 ). Blocking mTOR with rapamycin strongly increased ciliation in Wnt3a-CM treated cells, but not in control cells ( Fig. 5D ). mTOR inhibition also rescued ciliogenesis when GSK3 kinase activity was blocked by CHIR99021 (Fig. S3). Taken together, these data suggest that increased mTOR activity contributes to cilia loss under high Wnt baseline activation. Discussion Our findings indicate that balanced Wnt activity is crucial for proper ciliogenesis, as both excessive and insufficient Wnt signaling result in defects in cilia formation ( Fig. 5E , 5F). Consistently, the depletion of Wnt pathway components LRP5/6 or β-catenin reduces ciliogenesis in RPE1 cells, supporting the previously p roposed positive role of Wnt signaling in cilia biogenesis ( Kyun et al ., 2020 ; Zhang et al ., 2015 ; Zhang et al ., 2023 ). However, the conclusion that basal Wnt activity contributes to cilia formation cannot be generalized, as depletion of LRP5/6 or Axin had no effect on ciliogenesis in other studies ( Bernatik et al ., 2021 ; Zhang et al ., 2023 ). These differences may arise from growth conditions or intrinsic variations between cell types. For instance, HEK293 cells have a much lower rate of ciliation compared to RPE1 cells, a behavior that may interfere with the effect of basal Wnt activity on cilia initiation dynamics. Genetic variations between cell lines of similar origin may also play a role, as the depletion of LRP5/6 impaired ciliogenesis in the HEK293T but not in its parental HEK293 cell line ( Zhang et al ., 2023 ). These observations underscore the need for further detailed analysis considering not only the cellular context but also the genetic background of the cell lines being analyzed. Our data suggest that elevated baseline Wnt activity reduces, but does not entirely block, ciliogenesis in RPE1 cells. In our protocol, Wnt agonists were applied to cycling cells 6 h prior to inducing ciliogenesis through serum starvation. This brief, acute treatment effectively enhanced Wnt activity while preserving the cells’ ability to arrest in the G1/G0 phase of the cell cycle, a critical prerequisite for cilia biogenesis. The same treatment regimen also decreased cilia formation in mouse fibroblast cells (NIH3T3) and inner medullary collecting duct cells (IMCD3), ruling out a RPE1- specific behavior. Previous reports concluded that Wnt activation promotes or has no effect on cilia formation in RPE1 cells ( Bernatik et al ., 2021 ; Kyun et al ., 2020 ), although Bernatik et al. (2020) reported a mild decrease in ciliation, which aligns with our observations. We reason that differences in cell type, confluency, or timing of Wnt activation relative to cilia initiation may account for these differences. Early steps of ciliation involve the docking, fusion, and extension of ciliary vesicles at the mother centriole. Based on early vesicle-associated markers, cilia initiation has been shown to occur shortly (within 15 to 30 min) after serum starvation, although cilia extension dynamics may vary depending on the cell type and experimental condition ( Kanamaru et al , 2022 ; Wu et al , 2018 ). In previous studies, Wnt ligands were added 6 h or even 48 h after serum withdrawal ( Bernatik et al ., 2021 ; Kyun et al ., 2020 ). It is thus possible that canonical Wnt signaling activation is unable to block or reverse ciliation once ciliary vesicle establishment and axoneme extension have begun at the mother centriole. Our data indicate that early steps of cilia biogenesis are impaired when cells with an increased basal Wnt activity are triggered to ciliate through serum withdrawal. At this early stage, the mother centriole capping complex CP110-Cep97 blocks axoneme extension and its removal not only allows axoneme microtubule elongation but also facilitates the recruitment of Rab8-positive ciliary vesicles to basal bodies for cilia membrane elongation ( Sanchez & Dynlacht, 2016 ). In serum-starved cells with enhanced Wnt basal activity, induced by either Wnt3a-addition or GSK3 inhibition, a significantly higher percentage of cells retained CP110-Cep97 at mother centrioles, explaining the reduced accumulation of Rab8-positive vesicles at mother centrioles. GSK3-inhibition, but not Wnt3a-treatment, decreased the levels of the distal appendages proteins CEP164 and CHIBBY at mother centrioles. The reason for this difference remains unclear, suggesting a more complex role for Wnt signaling in ciliogenesis. Wnt activation effectively inhibits GSK3 from phosphorylating axin and β-catenin, but not additional GSK3 substrates that are unrelated to the destruction complex ( Ding et al , 2000 ). It is thus possible that an active pool of GSK3 remains in Wnt-stimulated cells, regulating the levels of CEP164 and CHIBBY at distal appendages. We found that Wnt hyperactivation prior to serum starvation affects the satellite pool of OFD1. This pool is typically removed through selective autophagy, facilitating the recruitment of components like the Bardet-Biedl Syndrome protein BBS4, which promote axoneme extension at the basal bodies ( Tang et al ., 2013 ). We propose that a defective autophagy-dependent removal of OFD1 at satellites is one key underlying mechanism delaying ciliogenesis in cells with high baseline Wnt activity. This notion is supported by our findings showing reduced autophagosome formation in cells with hyperactive Wnt, higher OFD1 levels at centriolar satellites and increased ciliogenesis upon ectopic depletion of OFD1 in cells with hyperactive Wnt. We reason that the decreased autophagy under high baseline Wnt activity is related to mTOR signaling, which inhibits autophagy through phosphorylation of multiple autophagy-related components involved in early but also late stages to autophagosome maturation ( Panwar et al ., 2023 ). The activation of Wnt signaling through LRP5/6 and Wnt3a ligand has been shown to stimulate mTOR activity in a GSK3-dependent manner, independently of β-catenin ( Inoki et al ., 2006 ). Our data show that, compared to serum-starved cells with basal Wnt activity, serum-starved cells treated with Wnt3a exhibited higher mTOR activity, as indicated by increased phosphorylation of S6K. Under this condition, the phosphorylation of S6K was sensitive to rapamycin, in agreement with the function of Wnt signaling in stimulating mTORC1 activity and S6K phosphorylation in a rapamycin-sensitive manner ( Inoki et al ., 2006 ). We thus postulate that when RPE1 cells with enhanced Wnt baseline activity are serum-starved, the decrease in GSK3 activity prior to serum starvation enhances mTOR activity, which in turn compromises OFD1-dependent autophagy removal and ciliogenesis. In agreement with this hypothesis, rapamycin treatment also rescued ciliogenesis in GSK3-inhibited cells. Interestingly, somatic hypermorphic mutations in mTOR are found in patients with neuronal development disorders related to focal malformation of cortical development (FMCD) ( Crino, 2016 ). In mouse models, hyperactive mTOR mutants result in loss of cilia due to impaired autophagy and OFD1 removal ( Park et al , 2018 ). Similar to our results in RPE1 cells, mTOR inhibition as well as ectopic OFD1 removal restored ciliogenesis and neuronal migration in FMCD mouse models ( Park et al ., 2018 ), highlighting the importance of this regulation in a physiological context. Wnt signaling and cilia are both key regulators of developmental programs, with defects in cilia and dysregulated Wnt signaling frequently implicated in pathological conditions such as developmental disorders, organ dysfunction, and cancer ( Sharma & Pruitt, 2020 ). Notably, Wnt hyperactivation in murine cerebral cortical progenitors with APC loss-of-function or β-catenin gain-of-function mutations reduces cilia formation and disrupts cortical development ( Nakagawa et al ., 2017 ), highlighting the importance of optimal WNT activity in cerebral cortical progenitor development. A critical question is how individual cells in the context of a developing tissue fine-tune Wnt signaling activation to ensure that cilia biogenesis initiates at the mother centriole at the correct developmental time. Our findings indicate that Wnt activity operates within a critical window to either stimulate or inhibit ciliogenesis, involving cross-talk with the mTOR pathway. In turn, cilia contribute to Wnt pathway activation ( May-Simera & Kelley, 2012 ; Vuong & Mlodzik, 2023 ). The Wnt-cilia relationship is further complicated by intricate interactions with other pathways, including mTOR, BMP, Notch, insulin, and Hippo, many of which influence or are influenced by ciliogenesis ( Habib & Acebron, 2022 ; Hilgendorf et al , 2024 ; Mill et al ., 2023 ; Qin et al , 2024 ). These findings underscore the tightly regulated interplay between these pathways, fine- tuned during development and responsive to environmental cues. Exploring these complex, tissue-specific interactions will yield valuable insights into the diverse phenotypes of ciliopathies and Wnt-related diseases. Materials and methods Cell culture conditions and treatments RPE1 cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Biochrom), 2 mM L-glutamine (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 0.348% NaHCO₃ (Sigma Aldrich). HEK293T and GP2-293 cells were maintained in DMEM high glucose medium supplemented with 10% FBS. NIH3T3 cells were grown in DMEM high glucose (Sigma Aldrich) with 10% newborn calf serum (NCS, PAN- Biotech). mIMCD3 cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS. All cell lines were maintained at 37°C in a 5% CO₂ atmosphere. To induce cilia formation by serum starvation, 2×10 4 -2.5×10 4 RPE1 or NIH3T3 cells were seeded on glass coverslips in 24-well plates for 24 h and incubated in serum- free medium for the indicated time points in each experiment. For mIMCD3 cells, 2.5×10 4 cells were seeded on glass coverslips in 24-well plates for 24 h and incubated in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 0.5% FBS for 24-48 h. Cell numbers were determined using the Luna automated cell counter (Logos Biosystems). Cells were treated with Co-CM and Wnt3a-CM (1:10 dilution in the corresponding media). CHIR99021 (Sigmal Aldrich) was used at a final concentration of 5 µM, BIO (Cayman Chemical) was used at a final concentration of 0.67 µM. Rapamycin (Sigmal Aldrich) was used at a final concentration of 1 µM. Cell lines and transfection RPE1 cells were transiently transfected by electroporation (NEPA21 Transfection System, Nepa Gene) or with FuGENE 6 (Promega), following the manufacturer’s protocols. RPE1 cells stably expressing mCherry-GFP-LC3 were a kind gift of Jon Lane (University of Bristol, UK) ( MacVicar et al , 2015 ). RPE1 cells stably expressing the Wnt reporter 7xTGC and HEK293T cells stably expressing Fzd subtype-specific, next generation surrogate (NGS) Wnt agonist were constructed by lentivirus transduction using the plasmids 7xTGC (addgene #24304) ( Fuerer & Nusse, 2010 ) and RKS-Fzd7/8 subtype NGS Wnt (addgene #159628) ( Miao et al , 2020 ), respectively. Lentivirus production was carried out in HEK293T cells using PEI (polyethyleneimine 25000, Polysciences) as transfection reagent and the packing plasmids pMD2.G (addgene #12259) and psPAX2 (addgene #12260). RPE1 or HEK293T GFP positive cells were FACS-sorted 15 days after lentiviral transduction. RPE1 cells were transfected with 40 µg of plasmids expressing WNT1 and DKK1 ( Bufe et al , 2021 ; Giebel et al , 2021 ). Small-interfering RNAs (siRNAs) Detailed information can be found in Table S2. Transfections of siRNA were performed with Lipofectamine RNAiMAX reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Fischer Scientific). Briefly, 3×10 4 cells were seeded per well in a 24-well plate and analyzed 48 h after the initial transfection. For western blotting analysis, 1.2×10 5 cells were reverse-transfected in one 6-well plate. Antibodies Primary antibodies used in this study are listed in Table S1. Secondary antibodies were purchased from Thermo-Fisher Scientific and included: goat anti-rabbit, anti-mouse or anti-guinea pig IgGs conjugated to HRP or Alexa Fluor 488, 594 or 647 (1:500 dilution). Conditioned media and Wnt surrogate purification Control and Wnt3a-conditioned media were produced as previously described ( Bufe et al ., 2021 ). Cells were incubated with Co- or Wnt3a-CM at 1:10 dilution. For surrogate Wnt agonist purification, HEK293T stably expressing the 6xHis-tagged surrogate Wnt agonist were seeded in one 15-cm dish and grown in DMEM/F12-high glucose (Sigma) media supplemented with 10% FBS for 7 days before separating the cells and cell culture supernatant by centrifugation. The supernatant was maintained on ice. The cell pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 100 mM imidazole, pH 8.0) and sonicated until cells were lysed. The lysate was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 20-30 min at 4°C to remove cell debris. The cleared lysate was collected, mixed with the cell culture supernatant and incubated with 1 ml of Ni-NTA Agarose (50% slurry in lysis buffer) for 1-2 h on a rotation wheel at 4°C. After 4 washes with washing-buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, pH 8.0), the recombinant protein was eluted in batch 7 times with 0.5 ml of elution buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole, pH 8.0). The fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and tested for activity in a TOPflash luciferase Wnt reporter assay, as previously described ( Bufe et al ., 2021 ). Active fractions were kept at -80°C for long- term storage. Cells were incubated with 25 µg/ml of purified surrogate Wnt agonist. FACS analysis of DNA content Cells were fixed with 70% ice-cold ethanol, and incubated with staining solution (50 µg/ml propidium iodide, 0.08% Triton X-100, 0.2 mg/ml RNase A, and 1 mM EDTA in PBS). Cells were subjected to DNA content analysis on a BD FACSCanto TM flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Indirect immunofluorescence and microscopy Cells were fixed with pre-cold methanol at -20°C for 5 min. Cells expressing fluorescence fusion proteins were fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde solution in PBS for 3 min at room temperature following by pre-cold methanol fixation for another 4 min at -20°C. For acetylated-tubulin stainings, cells were placed on ice for 20 min before fixation. Cells were blocked with PBST (PBS containing 3% IgG-free BSA and 0.1% Triton X-100) for 30 min, incubated with primary antibodies in a wet and dark chamber for 1 h and with secondary antibodies for 45 min at room temperature. All antibodies were diluted in PBST. Samples were mounted with Mowiol (EMD Millipore) before inspection. Images were acquired as Z-stacks using an automated Nikon Ti2 microscope coupled to a Scientific IRIS9 TM CMOS camera (Photometrics) and Nikon NIS-Elements software or with an automated Zeiss Axiovert Observer coupled to a AxioCam MRm CCD camera and Zeiss ZEN software. For live cell imaging, RPE1 cells (4×10 4 ) stably expressing the 7xTGC reporter were seeded in a glass bottom round dish (Ibidi) in HEPES-buffered DMEM/F12 medium without phenol red (Thermo Fisher Scientifics) and containing 10% FBS, 1% L-glutamine, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. After 24 h, the medium was exchanged to serum-free medium in the presence of Co-CM or Wnt3a-CM media. Images were acquired every 30 min for 24 h using a Nikon Ti-T2 microscope. Imaging processing and analysis Raw images were imported to Fiji image software ( Schindelin et al , 2012 ) for analysis and exported to Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator CS3 for panel arrangements. No manipulations were performed other than brightness, contrast, and color balance adjustments. For quantifications of signal intensity around centrosomes/basal bodies, fluorescence intensity was measured in Fiji using maximum projection of images. For this, two areas around the centrosome of 7 and 10 square pixels were measured for centrosome signal intensity and background correction, respectively. Centriolar satellite proteins were quantified with CellProfiler ( Carpenter et al , 2006 ) using γ- tubulin to segment the centrosome signal. Measurement of cilia length was performed using the Measure Plugin in Fiji. Data are shown as mean +/- standard error of the mean (S.D.), as indicated in the figure legends. Where indicated, Student’s t-test (two groups) was calculated using KaleidaGraph (Synergy Software). Outliners were not excluded. The models and schemes were created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International license. Western blotting For Western blotting, to extract cytoplasmic β-Catenin and phosphorylation protein, cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (supplemented with 1x protease phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche) or cytoplasmic lysis buffer (PBS supplemented with 0.05% saponin, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 2 mM EDTA) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail. For other proteins, cells were lysed in 8 M Urea in 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8 containing benzonase (Sigma, 1:1000 dilution of 250 units/µl stock). Samples were incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The protein concentration was measured by Bradford reagent (Sigma) accordingly to manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were heat up to 65°C for 5 min before loading on SDS-PAGE gels. Proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes using semi-dry blotting. To detect proteins larger than 120 kDa by western blot, a wet immunoblot on a PVDF membrane (GE Healthcare Amersham) was performed in the Borate buffer (1.25g Boric acid, 0.3725 g EDTA, to 1L with H2O, pH8.8). Blotting was performed at 350 mA for 3h at 4°C. Membranes were blocked with 5% milk or 5% BSA in PBST for 30 min. The membrane was incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies were incubated with the membrane for 1h at room temperature. Proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL; Pierce; Thermo Fisher Scientific) using a gel documentation system (INTAS Imager or Cytiva Amersham ImageQuant800). Acknowlegments We thank Jon Lane (University of Bristol, UK) for providing the RPE1 mCherry-GFP- LC3 cell line and Oliver Gruss (University of Bonn, Germany) for generously sharing the PCM1 antibodies. We acknowledge Monica Langlotz from the ZMBH FACS Facility, Ulrike Engel from the Nikon Imaging Facility, and Felix Bestvater and Manuela Brom from the DKFZ Imaging Facility for their invaluable technical support and resources. We thank Elmar Schiebel for critical reading the manuscript. This work was funded by the German Council Research (DFG) CRC1324 collaborative grant, projects B09, B03 and Z02. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S1. Wnt/β-catenin signaling hyperactivation delays primary cilia formation in RPE1, NIH3T3, and IMCD3 cells (A) Images of RPE1 cells expressing the 7xTGC Wnt reporter construct treated with Wnt3a-CM for the indicated time points. The increase in GFP signal reflects Wnt activation. (B) Western blot analysis of saponin lysed RPE1 cells treated with Co-CM or Wnt3a- CM (as depicted in figure 1C ) and serum starved for 16 h. Actin served as a loading control. (C) Experimental set up and quantification of ciliation of RPE1 cells treated with Co- CM and Wnt3a-CM at the indicated times after serum starvation. The bar graph indicates the mean +/- S.D. from three independent experiments. At least 150 cells were counted per sample and time point. (D) Pie chart showing the percentage of RPE1 cells in G1, S, and G2/M phases of the cell cycle as determined by FACS-based DNA content analysis after Co-CM and Wnt3a-CM treatment (as depicted in C) and 16 h of serum starvation. (E) Quantification of ciliation in NIH3T3 cells treated with Co-CM (n=461) and Wnt3a-CM (n=493) and serum starved for 16 h. The bar graph indicates the mean +/-S.D. from three independent experiments. (F) Quantification of ciliation in IMCD3 cells treated with Co-CM or Wnt3a-CM and serum starved for 24 h and 48 h. The bar graph indicates the mean +/- S.D. from three independent experiments. (G) Relative luciferase activity in HEK293T cells treated either with Co-CM or Wnt3a- CM at the indicated dilutions or with purified recombinant surrogate Wnt agonist (concentrations varying between 1 and 10 µg/ml as indicated). Reactions were done in the absence (black bars) or presence (red bars) of R-Spondin to enhance Wnt signaling. DKK1 (Wnt inhibitor) was used a control. Mean +/- S.D. from three independent experiments are shown. (H) Images of RPE1 7xTGC cells treated for 6 h with buffer (control) or 10 µg/ml of surrogate Wnt agonist. The increase in GFP signal reflects Wnt activation. Scale bar: 10 µm. P values are based on Student’s t-test analysis. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S2. Analysis of PCM1 and appendages upon Wnt signaling activation (A)Western blot analysis of saponin lysed RPE1 cells shows the levels of cytoplasmic β-catenin after 16 h of serum starvation and treatment with DMSO, BIO or CHIR99021. Actin served as a loading control. (B) Representative images and quantification of PCM1 fluorescence intensity at the centrosomal area (in arbitrary units) in RPE1 cells treated with Co-CM and Wnt3a-CM as depicted in S1C and serum starved for 16 h. γ-tubulin (red) and DAPI (blue) served as markers for centrosomes and nuclei, respectively. Magnifications of the centrosomal area are shown on the right as indicated. Co-CM, n=214; Wnt3a-CM, n=187. Scale bar: 10 µm. (C-F) RPE1 cells were treated with Co-CM and Wnt3a-CM and serum starved for 16 h as depicted in Figure 1C . Cells were stained for CEP164 (C), TTBK2 (D), CEP83 (E) and CHIBBY (F). γ-tubulin served as a centriolar marker. DNA was stained with DAPI. The graph shows the fluorescence intensity of the corresponding proteins at centrioles from three independent experiments. Representative images with enlargements of the centrosomal area are shown on the right. (C) Co-CM, n=130; Wnt3a-CM, n=114; (D) Co-CM, n=140; Wnt3a-CM, n=148; (E) Co-CM, n=119; Wnt3a-CM, n=132; (F) Co-CM, n=100; Wnt3a-CM, n=111. Scale bar: 10 µm. P values are based on Student’s t-test analysis. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S3. Inactivation of mTORC1 signaling rescues ciliogenesis upon Wnt signaling hyperactivation RPE1 cells were treated with solvent control (DMSO) or CHIR99021 in the presence or absence of rapamycin as indicated and serum starved for 16 h. The percentage of ciliated cells was quantified based on ARL13b (cilia membrane marker) and γ-tubulin (centriole/basal body marker). The graph shows the mean +/- S.D. from three independent experiments. DMSO, n=484; DMSO+rapamycin, n=588; CHIR99021+DMSO, n= 478; CHIR99021+Rapamycin, n=476. P values are based on Student’s t-test analysis. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table S1. Primary antibodies used in this study View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table S2. siRNAs used in this study References 1. ↵ Acebron SP , Karaulanov E , Berger BS , Huang YL , Niehrs C ( 2014 ) Mitotic wnt signaling promotes protein stabilization and regulates cell size . Mol Cell 54 : 663 – 674 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 2. ↵ Acebron SP , Niehrs C ( 2016 ) beta-Catenin-Independent Roles of Wnt/LRP6 Signaling . Trends Cell Biol 26 : 956 – 967 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ Begar E , Seyrek E , Firat-Karalar EN ( 2024 ) Navigating centriolar satellites: the role of PCM1 in cellular and organismal processes . FEBS J 4. ↵ Behrens J , von Kries JP , Kuhl M , Bruhn L , Wedlich D , Grosschedl R , Birchmeier W ( 1996 ) Functional interaction of beta-catenin with the transcription factor LEF-1 . Nature 382 : 638 – 642 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 5. ↵ Bernatik O , Paclikova P , Kotrbova A , Bryja V , Cajanek L ( 2021 ) Primary Cilia Formation Does Not Rely on WNT/beta-Catenin Signaling . Front Cell Dev Biol 9 : 623753 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 6. ↵ Bilic J , Huang YL , Davidson G , Zimmermann T , Cruciat CM , Bienz M , Niehrs C ( 2007 ) Wnt induces LRP6 signalosomes and promotes dishevelled-dependent LRP6 phosphorylation . Science 316 : 1619 – 1622 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 7. ↵ Bufe A , Garcia Del Arco A , Hennecke M , de Jaime-Soguero A , Ostermaier M , Lin YC , Ciprianidis A , Hattemer J , Engel U , Beli P et al. ( 2021 ) Wnt signaling recruits KIF2A to the spindle to ensure chromosome congression and alignment during mitosis . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118 8. ↵ Cadigan KM , Waterman ML ( 2012 ) TCF/LEFs and Wnt signaling in the nucleus . Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4 9. ↵ Carpenter AE , Jones TR , Lamprecht MR , Clarke C , Kang IH , Friman O , Guertin DA , Chang JH , Lindquist RA , Moffat J et al. ( 2006 ) CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes . Genome Biol 7 : R100 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 10. ↵ Crino PB ( 2016 ) The mTOR signalling cascade: paving new roads to cure neurological disease . Nat Rev Neurol 12 : 379 – 392 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 11. ↵ Cruciat CM , Ohkawara B , Acebron SP , Karaulanov E , Reinhard C , Ingelfinger D , Boutros M , Niehrs C ( 2010 ) Requirement of prorenin receptor and vacuolar H+- ATPase-mediated acidification for Wnt signaling . Science 327 : 459 – 463 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 12. ↵ Davidson G , Wu W , Shen J , Bilic J , Fenger U , Stannek P , Glinka A , Niehrs C ( 2005 ) Casein kinase 1 gamma couples Wnt receptor activation to cytoplasmic signal transduction . Nature 438 : 867 – 872 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 13. ↵ Deleyto-Seldas N , Efeyan A ( 2021 ) The mTOR-Autophagy Axis and the Control of Metabolism . Front Cell Dev Biol 9 : 655731 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 14. ↵ Devi R , Pelletier L , Prosser SL ( 2021 ) Charting the complex composite nature of centrosomes, primary cilia and centriolar satellites . Curr Opin Struct Biol 66 : 32 – 40 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 15. ↵ Ding VW , Chen RH , McCormick F ( 2000 ) Differential regulation of glycogen synthase kinase 3beta by insulin and Wnt signaling . J Biol Chem 275 : 32475 – 32481 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 16. ↵ Evangelisti C , Chiarini F , Paganelli F , Marmiroli S , Martelli AM ( 2020 ) Crosstalks of GSK3 signaling with the mTOR network and effects on targeted therapy of cancer . Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 1867 : 118635 OpenUrl 17. ↵ Fuerer C , Nusse R ( 2010 ) Lentiviral vectors to probe and manipulate the Wnt signaling pathway . PLoS One 5 : e9370 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 18. ↵ Giebel N , de Jaime-Soguero A , Garcia Del Arco A , Landry JJM , Tietje M , Villacorta L , Benes V , Fernandez-Saiz V , Acebron SP ( 2021 ) USP42 protects ZNRF3/RNF43 from R-spondin-dependent clearance and inhibits Wnt signalling . EMBO Rep 22 : e51415 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 19. ↵ Gonzalez-Sancho JM , Brennan KR , Castelo-Soccio LA , Brown AM ( 2004 ) Wnt proteins induce dishevelled phosphorylation via an LRP5/6- independent mechanism, irrespective of their ability to stabilize beta-catenin . Mol Cell Biol 24 : 4757 – 4768 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 20. ↵ Habib SJ , Acebron SP ( 2022 ) Wnt signalling in cell division: from mechanisms to tissue engineering . Trends Cell Biol 32 : 1035 – 1048 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 21. ↵ Hall EA , Kumar D , Prosser SL , Yeyati PL , Herranz-Perez V , Garcia-Verdugo JM , Rose L , McKie L , Dodd DO , Tennant PA et al. ( 2023 ) Centriolar satellites expedite mother centriole remodeling to promote ciliogenesis . Elife 12 22. ↵ Henley SA , Dick FA ( 2012 ) The retinoblastoma family of proteins and their regulatory functions in the mammalian cell division cycle . Cell Div 7 : 10 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 23. ↵ Hilgendorf KI , Myers BR , Reiter JF ( 2024 ) Emerging mechanistic understanding of cilia function in cellular signalling . Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 25 : 555 – 573 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 24. ↵ Hinze L , Pfirrmann M , Karim S , Degar J , McGuckin C , Vinjamur D , Sacher J , Stevenson KE , Neuberg DS , Orellana E et al. ( 2019 ) Synthetic Lethality of Wnt Pathway Activation and Asparaginase in Drug-Resistant Acute Leukemias . Cancer Cell 35 : 664 – 676 e667 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 25. ↵ Inoki K , Ouyang H , Zhu T , Lindvall C , Wang Y , Zhang X , Yang Q , Bennett C , Harada Y , Stankunas K et al. ( 2006 ) TSC2 integrates Wnt and energy signals via a coordinated phosphorylation by AMPK and GSK3 to regulate cell growth . Cell 126 : 955 – 968 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 26. ↵ Janda CY , Dang LT , You C , Chang J , de Lau W , Zhong ZA , Yan KS , Marecic O , Siepe D , Li X et al. ( 2017 ) Surrogate Wnt agonists that phenocopy canonical Wnt and beta- catenin signalling . Nature 545 : 234 – 237 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 27. ↵ Kanamaru T , Neuner A , Kurtulmus B , Pereira G ( 2022 ) Balancing the length of the distal tip by septins is key for stability and signalling function of primary cilia . EMBO J 41 : e108843 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 28. ↵ Kimura S , Noda T , Yoshimori T ( 2007 ) Dissection of the autophagosome maturation process by a novel reporter protein, tandem fluorescent-tagged LC3 . Autophagy 3 : 452 – 460 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 29. ↵ Knodler A , Feng S , Zhang J , Zhang X , Das A , Peranen J , Guo W ( 2010 ) Coordination of Rab8 and Rab11 in primary ciliogenesis . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107 : 6346 – 6351 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 30. ↵ Kobayashi T , Dynlacht BD ( 2011 ) Regulating the transition from centriole to basal body . J Cell Biol 193 : 435 – 444 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 31. ↵ Kubo A , Sasaki H , Yuba-Kubo A , Tsukita S , Shiina N ( 1999 ) Centriolar satellites: molecular characterization, ATP-dependent movement toward centrioles and possible involvement in ciliogenesis . J Cell Biol 147 : 969 – 980 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 32. ↵ Kumar D , Reiter J ( 2021 ) How the centriole builds its cilium: of mothers, daughters, and the acquisition of appendages . Curr Opin Struct Biol 66 : 41 – 48 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 33. ↵ Kurtulmus B , Wang W , Ruppert T , Neuner A , Cerikan B , Viol L , Duenas-Sanchez R , Gruss OJ , Pereira G ( 2016 ) WDR8 is a centriolar satellite and centriole-associated protein that promotes ciliary vesicle docking during ciliogenesis . J Cell Sci 129 : 621 – 636 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 34. ↵ Kyun ML , Kim SO , Lee HG , Hwang JA , Hwang J , Soung NK , Cha-Molstad H , Lee S , Kwon YT , Kim BY et al. ( 2020 ) Wnt3a Stimulation Promotes Primary Ciliogenesis through beta-Catenin Phosphorylation-Induced Reorganization of Centriolar Satellites . Cell Rep 30 : 1447 – 1462 e1445 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 35. ↵ Ma D , Wang F , Teng J , Huang N , Chen J ( 2023 ) Structure and function of distal and subdistal appendages of the mother centriole . J Cell Sci 136 36. ↵ MacVicar TD , Mannack LV , Lees RM , Lane JD ( 2015 ) Targeted siRNA Screens Identify ER-to-Mitochondrial Calcium Exchange in Autophagy and Mitophagy Responses in RPE1 Cells . Int J Mol Sci 16 : 13356 – 13380 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 37. ↵ May-Simera HL , Kelley MW ( 2012 ) Cilia, Wnt signaling, and the cytoskeleton . Cilia 1 : 7 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 38. ↵ Miao Y , Ha A , de Lau W , Yuki K , Santos AJM , You C , Geurts MH , Puschhof J , Pleguezuelos-Manzano C , Peng WC et al. ( 2020 ) Next-Generation Surrogate Wnts Support Organoid Growth and Deconvolute Frizzled Pleiotropy In Vivo . Cell Stem Cell 27 : 840 – 851 e846 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 39. ↵ Mill P , Christensen ST , Pedersen LB ( 2023 ) Primary cilia as dynamic and diverse signalling hubs in development and disease . Nat Rev Genet 24 : 421 – 441 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 40. ↵ Nakagawa N , Li J , Yabuno-Nakagawa K , Eom TY , Cowles M , Mapp T , Taylor R , Anton ES ( 2017 ) APC sets the Wnt tone necessary for cerebral cortical progenitor development . Genes Dev 31 : 1679 – 1692 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 41. ↵ Niehrs C ( 2006 ) Function and biological roles of the Dickkopf family of Wnt modulators . Oncogene 25 : 7469 – 7481 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 42. ↵ Nusse R , Clevers H ( 2017 ) Wnt/beta-Catenin Signaling, Disease, and Emerging Therapeutic Modalities . Cell 169 : 985 – 999 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 43. ↵ Pankiv S , Clausen TH , Lamark T , Brech A , Bruun JA , Outzen H , Overvatn A , Bjorkoy G , Johansen T ( 2007 ) p62/SQSTM1 binds directly to Atg8/LC3 to facilitate degradation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates by autophagy . J Biol Chem 282 : 24131 – 24145 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 44. ↵ Panwar V , Singh A , Bhatt M , Tonk RK , Azizov S , Raza AS , Sengupta S , Kumar D , Garg M ( 2023 ) Multifaceted role of mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) signaling pathway in human health and disease . Signal Transduct Target Ther 8 : 375 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 45. ↵ Park SM , Lim JS , Ramakrishina S , Kim SH , Kim WK , Lee J , Kang HC , Reiter JF , Kim DS , Kim HH et al. ( 2018 ) Brain Somatic Mutations in MTOR Disrupt Neuronal Ciliogenesis, Leading to Focal Cortical Dyslamination . Neuron 99 : 83 – 97 e87 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 46. ↵ Qin K , Yu M , Fan J , Wang H , Zhao P , Zhao G , Zeng W , Chen C , Wang Y , Wang A et al. ( 2024 ) Canonical and noncanonical Wnt signaling: Multilayered mediators, signaling mechanisms and major signaling crosstalk . Genes Dis 11 : 103 – 134 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 47. ↵ Reiter JF , Leroux MR ( 2017 ) Genes and molecular pathways underpinning ciliopathies . Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18 : 533 – 547 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 48. ↵ Rim EY , Clevers H , Nusse R ( 2022 ) The Wnt Pathway: From Signaling Mechanisms to Synthetic Modulators . Annu Rev Biochem 91 : 571 – 598 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 49. ↵ Sanchez I , Dynlacht BD ( 2016 ) Cilium assembly and disassembly . Nat Cell Biol 18 : 711 – 717 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 50. ↵ Schindelin J , Arganda-Carreras I , Frise E , Kaynig V , Longair M , Pietzsch T , Preibisch S , Rueden C , Saalfeld S , Schmid B et al. ( 2012 ) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis . Nat Methods 9 : 676 – 682 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 51. ↵ Schmidt KN , Kuhns S , Neuner A , Hub B , Zentgraf H , Pereira G ( 2012 ) Cep164 mediates vesicular docking to the mother centriole during early steps of ciliogenesis . J Cell Biol 199 : 1083 – 1101 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 52. ↵ Sharma M , Pruitt K ( 2020 ) Wnt Pathway: An Integral Hub for Developmental and Oncogenic Signaling Networks . Int J Mol Sci 21 53. ↵ Sillibourne JE , Hurbain I , Grand-Perret T , Goud B , Tran P , Bornens M ( 2013 ) Primary ciliogenesis requires the distal appendage component Cep123 . Biol Open 2 : 535 – 545 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 54. ↵ Spektor A , Tsang WY , Khoo D , Dynlacht BD ( 2007 ) Cep97 and CP110 suppress a cilia assembly program . Cell 130 : 678 – 690 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 55. ↵ Stamos JL , Weis WI ( 2013 ) The beta-catenin destruction complex . Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5 : a007898 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 56. ↵ Stolz A , Neufeld K , Ertych N , Bastians H ( 2015 ) Wnt-mediated protein stabilization ensures proper mitotic microtubule assembly and chromosome segregation . EMBO Rep 16 : 490 – 499 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 57. ↵ Taelman VF , Dobrowolski R , Plouhinec JL , Fuentealba LC , Vorwald PP , Gumper I , Sabatini DD , De Robertis EM ( 2010 ) Wnt signaling requires sequestration of glycogen synthase kinase 3 inside multivesicular endosomes . Cell 143 : 1136 – 1148 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 58. ↵ Tang Z , Lin MG , Stowe TR , Chen S , Zhu M , Stearns T , Franco B , Zhong Q ( 2013 ) Autophagy promotes primary ciliogenesis by removing OFD1 from centriolar satellites . Nature 502 : 254 – 257 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 59. ↵ Tanos BE , Yang HJ , Soni R , Wang WJ , Macaluso FP , Asara JM , Tsou MF ( 2013 ) Centriole distal appendages promote membrane docking, leading to cilia initiation . Genes Dev 27 : 163 – 168 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 60. ↵ Tischer J , Carden S , Gergely F ( 2021 ) Accessorizing the centrosome: new insights into centriolar appendages and satellites . Curr Opin Struct Biol 66 : 148 – 155 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 61. ↵ Vorobjev IA , Chentsov Yu S ( 1982 ) Centrioles in the cell cycle . I. Epithelial cells. J Cell Biol 93 : 938 – 949 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 62. ↵ Vuong LT , Mlodzik M ( 2023 ) The complex relationship of Wnt-signaling pathways and cilia . Curr Top Dev Biol 155 : 95 – 125 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 63. ↵ Westlake CJ , Baye LM , Nachury MV , Wright KJ , Ervin KE , Phu L , Chalouni C , Beck JS , Kirkpatrick DS , Slusarski DC et al. ( 2011 ) Primary cilia membrane assembly is initiated by Rab11 and transport protein particle II (TRAPPII) complex-dependent trafficking of Rabin8 to the centrosome . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108 : 2759 – 2764 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 64. ↵ Wu CT , Chen HY , Tang TK ( 2018 ) Myosin-Va is required for preciliary vesicle transportation to the mother centriole during ciliogenesis . Nat Cell Biol 20 : 175 – 185 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 65. ↵ Xie S , Naslavsky N , Caplan S ( 2024 ) Emerging insights into CP110 removal during early steps of ciliogenesis . J Cell Sci 137 66. ↵ Zeng X , Tamai K , Doble B , Li S , Huang H , Habas R , Okamura H , Woodgett J , He X ( 2005 ) A dual-kinase mechanism for Wnt co-receptor phosphorylation and activation . Nature 438 : 873 – 877 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 67. ↵ Zhang B , Zhang T , Wang G , Wang G , Chi W , Jiang Q , Zhang C ( 2015 ) GSK3beta- Dzip1-Rab8 cascade regulates ciliogenesis after mitosis . PLoS Biol 13 : e1002129 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 68. ↵ Zhang K , Da Silva F , Seidl C , Wilsch-Brauninger M , Herbst J , Huttner WB , Niehrs C ( 2023 ) Primary cilia are WNT-transducing organelles whose biogenesis is controlled by a WNT-PP1 axis . Dev Cell 58 : 139 – 154 e138 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 69. ↵ Zhao H , Khan Z , Westlake CJ ( 2023 ) Ciliogenesis membrane dynamics and organization . Semin Cell Dev Biol 133 : 20 – 31 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted January 13, 2025. Download PDF Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Wnt/LRP6 signaling imbalance impairs ciliogenesis in human retina epithelial cells Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Wnt/LRP6 signaling imbalance impairs ciliogenesis in human retina epithelial cells Cheng Yuan , Ayushi Branushali , Matias Simons , Sergio P. Acebrón , Gislene Pereira bioRxiv 2025.01.10.632335; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.10.632335 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Wnt/LRP6 signaling imbalance impairs ciliogenesis in human retina epithelial cells Cheng Yuan , Ayushi Branushali , Matias Simons , Sergio P. Acebrón , Gislene Pereira bioRxiv 2025.01.10.632335; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.10.632335 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Cell Biology Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7635) Biochemistry (17690) Bioengineering (13892) Bioinformatics (41936) Biophysics (21451) Cancer Biology (18588) Cell Biology (25499) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13378) Ecology (19899) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24320) Genetics (15609) Genomics (22506) Immunology (17736) Microbiology (40394) Molecular Biology (17181) Neuroscience (88603) Paleontology (666) Pathology (2832) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4824) Physiology (7641) Plant Biology (15152) Scientific Communication and Education (2045) Synthetic Biology (4294) Systems Biology (9825) Zoology (2271)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00