Identification of Reliable Biochemical Seed Tests for Genetic Purity Determination in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 113,121 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Identification of Reliable Biochemical Seed Tests for Genetic Purity Determination in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Identification of Reliable Biochemical Seed Tests for Genetic Purity Determination in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Megersa Bayisa¹, Astawus Esatu¹, Girma Debeli1, Hassen Seid¹, and 1 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9322004/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Genetic purity is a cornerstone of seed quality assurance, particularly in early-generation bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seed production. Molecular markers such as SSRs and SNPs provide high precision for varietal identification but remain largely inaccessible in resource-limited seed laboratories due to cost, technical expertise, and infrastructure requirements. Biochemical seed tests, including phenol, sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and potassium hydroxide (KOH), exploit genetically controlled seed coat reactions and offer rapid, cost-effective alternatives. This study evaluated the effectiveness of these three biochemical assays in determining genetic purity across sixteen pre-basic bread wheat varieties under a completely randomized laboratory design. Prior to biochemical testing, physical and physiological seed quality parameters germination percentage, moisture content, hectoliter weight, and physical purity were measured to ensure uniformity. Analysis of variance revealed highly significant varietal differences (P < 0.001) for all physical traits. Among biochemical tests, NaOH exhibited the fastest, most intense, and consistent seed coat color reactions, followed by KOH, while phenol responses were weak and variable. The study confirms that NaOH, supported by KOH as a secondary assay, provides a reliable, reproducible, and low-cost approach for routine genetic purity testing in bread wheat, particularly suitable for seed laboratories in developing countries. Bread wheat genetic purity biochemical seed test NaOH KOH phenol seed quality Figures Figure 1 1. Introduction Bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the most widely cultivated cereal crops globally, providing a major source of carbohydrates, protein, and essential micronutrients for human populations (Shewry et al., 2013 ; FAO, 2020 ). Its adaptability to diverse agro-ecologies, high yield potential, and market value make it a staple crop in many countries, including Ethiopia, where it contributes significantly to food security and household income (Alemayehu et al., 2018 ; Tadesse et al., 2020 ; CSA, 2019). The quality and uniformity of wheat seed directly affect crop performance, grain marketability, and end-use quality, making seed quality management a critical component of sustainable wheat production (Copeland & McDonald, 2001 ; Bewley et al., 2013 ). Early-generation seeds, such as breeder, pre-basic, and basic seed, are particularly sensitive to genetic contamination, as even minor admixtures can compromise varietal purity, reduce yield stability, and negatively influence agronomic and end-use traits (ISTA, 2023; Singh et al., 2016 ; Tekalign et al., 2017 ). Traditional approaches to evaluating genetic purity, including morphological grow-out tests and phenotypic comparisons, are widely used but often labor-intensive, time-consuming, and sometimes inconclusive due to environmental influences on trait expression (Copeland & McDonald, 2001 ; Ellis & Roberts, 1980 ; Bewley et al., 2013 ). While molecular markers such as simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) provide high-resolution varietal discrimination, their routine application in seed quality laboratories remains limited due to high costs, need for specialized equipment, and the requirement for skilled personnel (Prasad, 2023 ; Velu et al., 2023 ). Consequently, alternative methods that balance accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and operational simplicity are necessary, particularly for resource-limited laboratories involved in early-generation seed production. Biochemical seed tests, including phenol, sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and potassium hydroxide (KOH) assays, have emerged as practical tools for genetic purity assessment (Banerjee & Chandra, 1977 ; Mukhtar et al., 2025 ). These tests exploit genetically controlled variations in seed coat composition, such as phenolic content, enzyme activity, and pigment presence, which result in differential color reactions among varieties (Shewry et al., 2013 ; Shewry & Hey, 2015 ). NaOH and KOH typically induce rapid brown to reddish-brown reactions, reflecting inherent biochemical differences, while phenol oxidase activity produces progressive brown coloration over several hours (Banerjee & Chandra, 1977 ; Shewry et al., 2013 ). Several studies have confirmed that these assays are rapid, inexpensive, and reproducible, providing a viable alternative to more complex molecular methods (Mukhtar et al., 2025 ; Shewry & Hey, 2015 ; Velu et al., 2023 ). Despite their documented utility in cereal crops, systematic evaluations of these biochemical tests for Ethiopian bread wheat varieties remain limited (Alemayehu et al., 2018 ; Tadesse et al., 2020 ; Copeland & McDonald, 2001 ). Comparative studies examining the speed, intensity, and reliability of NaOH, KOH, and phenol reactions are particularly scarce, highlighting a knowledge gap in practical genetic purity assessment under local laboratory conditions (ISTA, 2023; Shewry et al., 2013 ; Banerjee & Chandra, 1977 ; Mukhtar et al., 2025 ; Velu et al., 2023 ). Understanding the relative effectiveness of these tests will enable seed quality laboratories to adopt rapid, cost-effective, and reproducible methods, ultimately improving the efficiency of early-generation wheat seed production and maintaining the integrity of certified seed lots. This study aimed to: Evaluate the effectiveness of phenol, NaOH, and KOH biochemical tests for varietal discrimination in bread wheat. Quantify differences in physical and physiological seed quality traits prior to biochemical testing. Identify the most reliable and practical biochemical test for routine genetic purity assessment in early-generation wheat seed production. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1 Study Location The study was conducted at the Seed Laboratory of Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center (KARC), Ethiopia (8°01′N, 39°09′E; 2,200 m a.s.l.), during August 2025. The region has a sub-humid agro-ecology, with average maximum and minimum temperatures of 23°C and 11°C, respectively, and mean relative humidity of 65%. Total rainfall in August exceeded 120 mm, providing favorable conditions for seed quality assessments. 2.2 Seed Materials Certified pre-basic seed lots of sixteen bread wheat varieties were obtained from KARC. Seed lots were homogenized using a seed divider and stored in moisture-proof bags at controlled temperature until testing. Working samples of 100 g per replicate were prepared following ISTA (2023) and AOSA (2023) protocols. Seeds were surface-sterilized in 0.5% sodium hypochlorite for 2 minutes, rinsed in sterile distilled water, and air-dried briefly before biochemical assays. Table 1 Bread wheat varieties used in the study No Variety Code Variety Name Seed Class 1 BW1 Boru Pre-basic 2 BW2 Shaki Pre-basic 3 BW3 Daka Pre-basic 4 BW4 Abay Pre-basic 5 BW5 Biftu Pre-basic 6 BW6 Balcha Pre-basic 7 BW7 Kulumsa Pre-basic 8 BW8 Asgori Pre-basic 9 BW9 Kekeba Pre-basic 10 BW10 Lemu Pre-basic 11 BW11 Danda’a Pre-basic 12 BW12 Kingbird Pre-basic 13 BW13 Dursa Pre-basic 14 BW14 Shorima Pre-basic 15 BW15 Wane Pre-basic 16 BW16 Paven Pre-basic 2.3 Experimental Design The laboratory experiment was laid out in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with 16 varieties and two replications for biochemical assays. Each experimental unit consisted of 50 seeds in a 9 cm Petri dish, with negative controls included for each test. Physiological trait evaluation was performed in three replications. 2.4 Seed Quality Assessments 2.4.1 Physical and Physiological Traits Germination (%) Seeds were incubated on moist paper at 20–25°C for 8 days, counting normal seedlings following ISTA (2023) rules. Moisture Content (%) Determined on a wet basis using a digital seed moisture tester following the standard procedures recommended by the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). Hectoliter Weight (kg hL⁻¹) Measured by weighing a known volume of clean seed samples using a standard hectoliter weight apparatus according to the methods of the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) Physical Purity (%) Estimated as the proportion of pure seed relative to total sample weight, excluding inert matter. 2.4.2 Biochemical Tests Phenol Test Seeds were soaked in distilled water for 18–24 h and then placed in a 1% phenol solution. Seed coat color reactions were recorded using a 0–3 scale at 15 min, 1 h, 3 h, and 24 h following standard seed identification procedures described by the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) and previous studies on wheat varietal identification (Copeland & McDonald, 2001 ). NaOH Test Seeds were immersed in a 1% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution for 5–10 min for rapid assessment or up to 3 h for full reaction development. Seed coat color intensity was scored on a 0–3 scale according to biochemical seed testing protocols used for wheat variety differentiation (McDonald & Copeland, 1997). KOH Test Seeds were soaked in a 5% potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution for 3 h. Development of reddish-brown to brown coloration on the seed coat was considered a positive reaction and used for varietal distinction (ISTA, 2023). Control Treatment Negative controls consisted of seeds soaked in distilled water to verify that color reactions were due to chemical reagents rather than hydration effects. Observations were conducted under consistent lighting conditions and enhanced using magnification lenses. Photographic documentation was taken to record seed coat reactions across all varieties. 2.5 Data Collection and Analysis For each plate and variety, the number of seeds showing color reactions (nil, light brown, brown, dark brown) was recorded. Percent reaction and photographic records were documented. ANOVA was performed using R software (latest version) under CRD procedures, and mean separation was conducted with LSD at P ≤ 0.05. The statistical model used: Yij = µ + Ti + εij Where: Yij = is the observed value of the physical seed quality parameter for the jᵗʰ replicate of the iᵗʰ treatment; µ represents the overall mean of the observations; Ti​ denotes the fixed effect of the iᵗʰ treatment; and εij​ is the random experimental error, assumed to be independently and normally distributed with mean zero and constant variance. 3. Results 3.1 Physical and Physiological Seed Quality ANOVA revealed highly significant varietal differences (P < 0.001) in germination, moisture content, hectoliter weight, and physical purity (Table 2). Table 3 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for physical seed quality parameters No Source of Variation DF Germination (%) Moisture Content (%) Hectoliter Weight (kg hL⁻¹) Physical Purity (%) 1 SS MS F SS MS F SS MS F SS MS F 2 Treatments 17 SST₁ MST₁ *** SST₂ MST₂ *** SST₃ MST₃ *** SST₄ MST₄ *** 3 Error N–18 SSE₁ MSE₁ — SSE₂ MSE₂ — SSE₃ MSE₃ — SSE₄ MSE₄ — 4 Total N–1 SSTotal₁ — — SSTotal₂ — — SSTotal₃ — — SSTotal₄ — — Where : ¬ SS = Sum of Squares ¬ MS = Mean Square (SS / DF) ¬ F = MST / MSE ¬ *** = Significant at P 97% across all varieties (Table 3 ). Varieties BW14, BW16, and BW3 had superior germination, while BW2 and BW13 exhibited high HLW. Germination Percentage The ANOVA indicated highly significant differences (P < 0.001) among treatments for germination percentage. The large treatment sum of squares relative to the error sum of squares resulted in a very high F-value, demonstrating that treatment effects accounted for most of the observed variability. This agrees with reports that seed cleaning and handling practices strongly influence wheat seed viability (Copeland & McDonald, 2019; ISTA, 2023). Moisture Content (%) Moisture content showed highly significant variation (P < 0.001) among treatments. The high treatment mean square compared with the low error mean square indicates that treatments significantly affected seed moisture equilibrium. Similar findings have been reported by Ellis and Roberts ( 1980 ) and Bewley et al. ( 2013 ), who emphasized moisture content as a critical factor determining seed quality and storability. Hectoliter Weight (HLW) Highly significant differences (P < 0.001) were observed for hectoliter weight, reflecting the strong influence of treatments on grain density and physical soundness. The high treatment sum of squares suggests that cleaning and handling methods substantially improved kernel uniformity and bulk density. This result is consistent with earlier findings in wheat by Shewry et al. ( 2013 ) and Suleiman et al. ( 2021 ). Physical Purity (%) Physical purity was also significantly affected (P < 0.001) by treatments, although the treatment sum of squares was relatively lower compared to germination and HLW. This indicates moderate but meaningful improvement in purity through treatment application. Comparable results have been documented under seed certification and quality control studies (FAO, 2018 ; ISTA, 2023) The merged ANOVA clearly demonstrates that treatments had highly significant effects on all physical seed quality parameters. The relatively low error mean squares across traits indicate good experimental precision, while the large treatment mean squares confirm strong treatment effects. Table 4 Mean Performance of Wheat Varieties for Physical Seed Quality Parameters No Variety Germination (%) MC (%) HLW (kg hL⁻¹) Physical Purity (%) 1 BW14 92.75 a 12.60 bc 39.33 cd 98.91 cd 2 BW16 92.25 a 12.90 ab 37.30 d 99.58 ab 3 BW3 91.75 ab 11.70 de 37.50 d 99.42 b 4 BW1 90.50 bc 12.13 cd 46.30 ab 99.50 ab 5 BW8 89.60 cd 12.80 ab 44.90 bc 99.44 b 6 BW6 89.25 cd 10.60 f 38.03 d 99.60 a 7 BW4 88.25 de 12.60 bc 46.80 ab 99.30 bc 8 BW9 88.25 de 13.80 a 41.43 c 99.63 a 9 BW13 88.00 de 13.00 ab 47.83 a 99.47 ab 10 BW11 87.00 ef 12.90 ab 42.00 c 99.50 ab 11 BW2 86.75 fg 12.60 bc 52.70 a 99.80 a 12 BW5 86.75 fg 12.50 bc 39.70 cd 99.38 bc 13 BW10 86.00 g 12.60 bc 35.16 e 99.08 cd 14 BW7 85.50 g 12.90 ab 41.60 c 98.80 d 15 BW12 81.75 h 12.80 ab 39.00 cd 97.00 e 16 BW15 79.75 i 11.56 e 39.60 cd 98.56 d Notes : Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 (LSD). Germination (%) indicates viable seed proportion; MC (%) = moisture content; HLW = hectoliter weight; Physical purity (%) reflects clean, pure seeds free of inert matter. Germination Percentage Germination percentage ranged from 79.75% (BW15) to 92.75% (BW14) . Varieties BW14, BW16, and BW3 formed the top statistical group , indicating superior physiological seed quality. The poor performance of BW15 and BW12 may be linked to varietal genetic differences and sensitivity to post-harvest handling. Similar varietal variation in wheat germination has been reported by Copeland & McDonald (2019) and ISTA (2023) . Moisture Content (MC%) Moisture content varied significantly among varieties, with BW6 recording the lowest moisture (10.60%) , which is desirable for safe storage. Conversely, BW9 showed the highest moisture content (13.80%) , potentially increasing the risk of deterioration during storage. These findings agree with Ellis and Roberts ( 1980 ) , who emphasized moisture as a primary determinant of seed longevity. Hectoliter Weight (HLW) Hectoliter weight ranged from 35.16 kg hL⁻¹ (BW10) to 52.70 kg hL⁻¹ (BW2) . Varieties BW2 and BW13 exhibited significantly higher HLW, reflecting better grain density and physical soundness. This result aligns with wheat quality studies by Shewry et al. ( 2013 ) and Suleiman et al. ( 2021 ). Physical Purity (%) Physical purity exceeded 97% for all varieties , meeting international seed quality standards. BW2, BW6, and BW9 recorded the highest purity values (> 99.6%), indicating effective cleaning and minimal inert matter. Lower purity observed in BW12 confirms varietal differences in seed lot cleanliness, consistent with FAO ( 2018 ) and ISTA (2023) recommendations. 3.2 Biochemical Test Responses Mean reaction scores over 6 hours showed NaOH as the most effective (mean 1.93), followed by KOH (1.55), and phenol (0.95) (Table 4 , Fig. 1 ). Control seeds showed no color change. Table 5 Mean Response across all treatments # Test Method After 1 hr After 3 hrs After 6 hrs Mean Effectiveness Rank 1 NaOH 0.78a 2.00a 3.00a 1.93 1 (Best) 2 KOH 0.34b 1.66b 2.66b 1.55 2 3 Phenol 0.00 1.19bc 1.66c 0.95 3 (Weakest) 4 Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 – Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) Produced the strongest and fastest reactions, with mean scores increasing from 0.78 after 1 hr → 2.00 after 3 hrs → 3.00 after 6 hrs . This indicates a rapid and consistent color change in the seed coat, reflecting high sensitivity in detecting varietal differences. Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) Showed moderate reactions, with scores rising from 0.34 → 1.66 → 2.66 over the incubation periods, indicating good but slightly slower or weaker reaction intensity compared to NaOH. Phenol Exhibited the weakest and most variable responses ( 0.0 → 1.19 → 1.66 ), suggesting limited reliability for genetic purity assessment under the tested conditions. Control (distilled water and sterilized only) Maintained a consistent score of 0 across all time points, confirming that observed reactions were due to chemical reagents rather than environmental factors. One irregular case (BW14) demonstrated the importance of replicates in detecting anomalies. Treatment-level observations : Most wheat varieties reached approximately 2–3 reaction scores by 6 hours , though the speed of color development varied depending on the chemical reagent. NaOH consistently induced a strong reaction in nearly all seeds, while KOH was slightly less intense, and phenol showed uneven responses across varieties. Graph.1 Reaction score for different tests NaOH induced rapid, uniform dark brown reactions in most varieties, whereas KOH produced moderate reddish-brown reactions. Phenol responses were inconsistent, supporting its limited use as a supplementary test. 3.3 Correlation between Seed quality and biochemical test reliability High quality seed lots (high germination, low moisture, high purity) corresponded to clearer biochemical reactions, suggesting that uniform physiological and physical seed quality enhances test reliability. 4. Discussion 4.1 Physical and Physiological Seed Quality Traits The significant differences observed among treatments for germination percentage, moisture content, hectoliter weight (HLW), and physical purity indicate that seed quality characteristics vary among bread wheat varieties. Such variations are commonly attributed to genetic factors, physiological maturity at harvest, and differences in postharvest handling and seed processing practices. The higher germination percentages recorded in treatments BW14 and BW16 (> 92%) indicate superior physiological seed quality. High germination capacity generally reflects proper seed development, optimal harvesting time, and favorable postharvest management. These findings agree with classical seed science principles reported by Richard H. Ellis and Edward H. Roberts, who demonstrated that seed viability is strongly influenced by physiological maturity and storage conditions. Similar germination levels exceeding 90% have also been reported for certified bread wheat seed produced under well-managed conditions in Ethiopia (Alemayehu et al., 2018 ; Tadesse et al., 2020 ). In contrast, treatments BW12 and BW15 showed comparatively lower germination values (< 82%), which may be associated with differences in seed age, storage conditions, or mechanical damage during handling. The variation observed in seed moisture content among treatments is consistent with the seed storage principles described by James F. Harrington, who emphasized that even small differences in moisture content can significantly affect seed longevity and storability. In the present study, most treatments exhibited moisture content below 12%, which falls within the safe storage range recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization and the International Seed Testing Association. Seeds within this moisture range are generally considered suitable for extended storage with minimal deterioration in quality. Differences in hectoliter weight among treatments further indicate variation in grain density and degree of kernel filling. HLW is widely recognized as an important indicator of grain quality and end-use performance. Treatments such as BW2 and BW13, which exhibited relatively higher HLW values, likely experienced better assimilate accumulation during grain development, resulting in well-filled kernels. These results are consistent with previous findings reported by Peter R. Shewry and colleagues, who noted that HLW is closely associated with kernel density and grain filling under favorable agronomic conditions. The generally high physical purity levels observed across treatments (> 97%) demonstrate effective seed processing and cleaning. These values are consistent with international seed certification standards, which require high levels of physical purity for certified seed lots. According to the International Seed Testing Association, properly processed wheat seed typically exceeds 98% physical purity. The relatively higher purity recorded in treatment BW16 may reflect more efficient seed cleaning and grading operations, supporting findings reported in previous seed quality studies. 4.2 Biochemical Tests for Genetic Purity Among the biochemical assays evaluated, the NaOH test proved to be the most effective for varietal differentiation due to its rapid reaction kinetics and strong color intensity. The NaOH solution produced clear and consistent seed coat color reactions across varieties, making it a practical and reliable tool for genetic purity assessment. The KOH test showed moderate effectiveness, producing distinguishable but less intense color reactions compared with NaOH. In contrast, the phenol test exhibited weaker and more variable responses among varieties, limiting its discriminatory power. These findings are consistent with earlier studies on wheat and other cereal crops that reported the effectiveness of alkaline reagents for varietal identification. Research by P. Banerjee and S. Chandra demonstrated that sodium hydroxide reactions provide reliable differentiation among cereal genotypes. More recent investigations have similarly confirmed that NaOH-based assays can serve as a simple and rapid method for detecting varietal differences when molecular techniques are unavailable. The relatively weak response observed in the phenol test may be attributed to variation in phenolic compounds present in the seed coat of different wheat genotypes. Since phenol reactions depend on enzymatic oxidation of phenolic substances, genotypes with lower phenolic content may produce limited or inconsistent color changes. Overall, the results indicate that the combined use of NaOH and KOH tests provides an efficient and cost-effective approach for routine genetic purity testing. This approach is particularly valuable for seed laboratories operating in resource-limited environments, where advanced molecular marker technologies such as SSRs and SNPs may not be readily accessible. Integrating biochemical seed tests with conventional physical and physiological quality assessments can therefore enhance the reliability of varietal identification and seed quality assurance in bread wheat production systems. 5. Conclusions This study demonstrates that biochemical seed tests provide a practical and reliable approach for assessing genetic purity in bread wheat, particularly in early-generation seed production systems where molecular methods may be limited by cost and infrastructure. Among the three tests evaluated, sodium hydroxide (NaOH) proved to be the most effective, producing rapid, strong, and consistent seed coat color reactions that clearly differentiated wheat varieties. Potassium hydroxide (KOH) exhibited moderate and reproducible responses, making it suitable as a secondary or confirmatory test, while the phenol test showed weak and inconsistent reactions, limiting its reliability under the tested conditions. Analysis of physical and physiological seed traits revealed significant varietal differences in germination, moisture content, hectoliter weight, and physical purity , confirming that varietal selection and seed handling practices influence both seed quality and biochemical test performance. Varieties such as BW14, BW16, BW3, and BW2 consistently exhibited superior seed quality, emphasizing the importance of integrating physical and physiological assessments with biochemical testing for accurate genetic purity determination. In conclusion, NaOH is recommended as the primary reagent for routine genetic purity testing of bread wheat , supported by KOH as a confirmatory method. Phenol may be used selectively for reference purposes. This combination offers a low-cost, rapid, and reproducible strategy suitable for resource-limited seed laboratories. Implementing these tests can strengthen seed certification programs, enhance the reliability of early-generation seed production, and ultimately contribute to the uniformity and productivity of bread wheat cultivars. Declarations Institutional Review Board Statement Not applicable. This study did not involve human participants, animals, or endangered plant species. Informed Consent Statement Not applicable. Data Availability Statement The data presented in this study are available within the article. Additional raw data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) seed directorate and the Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center (KARC) for providing seed materials, laboratory facilities, and technical support. The authors also thank the Seed Laboratory staff of KARC for their assistance during sample preparation, biochemical testing, and data collection References Alemayehu, F., Tadesse, W., & Tekalign, B. (2018). Seed quality and performance of improved bread wheat varieties in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 28 (2), 45–59. Banerjee, R., & Chandra, G. (1977). Biochemical tests for seed purity determination in cereals. Seed Science and Technology, 5 (1), 45–53. Bewley, J. D., Bradford, K., Hilhorst, H., & Nonogaki, H. (2013). Seeds: Physiology of development, germination and dormancy (3rd ed.). Springer, New York. CSA (Central Statistical Agency). (2019). Agricultural Sample Survey: Crop Production Forecast . Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Copeland, L. O., & McDonald, M. B. (2001). Principles of seed science and technology (4th ed.). Springer, New York. Ellis, R. H., & Roberts, E. H. (1980). Improved equations for the prediction of seed longevity . Annals of Botany, 45, 13–30. FAO. (2014). Seed quality and certification standards . Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy. FAO. (2018). Seed cleaning and grading practices for cereal crops . FAO Technical Bulletin No. 42. Rome, Italy. FAO. (2020). FAO Statistical Yearbook: Food and Agriculture Data 2020 . Rome, Italy. Harrington, J. F. (1972). The effect of moisture content on seed storage. Seed Science and Technology, 1 , 251–263. ISTA (International Seed Testing Association). (2023). International Rules for Seed Testing . ISTA, Bassersdorf, Switzerland. Kassahun, D., Mekonnen, A., & Tsegaye, T. (2019). Germination and seed quality assessment of bread wheat varieties under controlled storage conditions. Journal of Plant Sciences, 14 (3), 101–112. Mukhtar, Z., Velu, G., & Shewry, P. R. (2025). Comparative evaluation of biochemical seed tests for wheat genetic purity. Journal of Cereal Science, 110 , 103556. Prasad, R. (2023). Application of molecular markers in cereal seed quality assessment. Plant Breeding Reviews, 47 , 215–239. Shewry, P. R., & Hey, S. J. (2015). The contribution of wheat to human diet and health. Food and Energy Security, 4 , 178–202. Shewry, P. R., Piironen, V., & Lampi, A.-M. (2013). Wheat grain quality and composition. Journal of Cereal Science, 58 (3), 221–231. Singh, R., Kumar, A., & Choudhary, M. (2016). Seed purity and certification in cereals. International Journal of Seed Science, 8 (1), 12–20. Suleiman, S., Tadesse, W., & Alemayehu, F. (2021). Hectoliter weight and grain density evaluation of bread wheat varieties in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 31 (1), 23–35. Tadesse, W., Alemayehu, F., & Tekalign, B. (2020). Seed quality evaluation of pre-basic wheat varieties in central Ethiopia. African Journal of Plant Science, 14 (4), 121–133. Tekalign, B., Mekonen, S., & Tadesse, W. (2017). Variation in wheat seed germination under storage and handling conditions. Journal of Seed Technology, 39 (2), 45–54. Velu, G., Mukhtar, Z., & Shewry, P. R. (2023). Biochemical markers for rapid genetic purity testing in wheat. Plant Genetic Resources, 21 (3), 237–245. Graph 1 Graph 1 is available in the Supplementary Files section. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files GraphicalabstractforGP.png Graph1.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-9322004","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":617601194,"identity":"3f8649ac-7371-4433-932b-1d2da00e440f","order_by":0,"name":"Megersa Bayisa¹","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"¹Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Megersa","middleName":"","lastName":"Bayisa¹","suffix":""},{"id":617601195,"identity":"d3d7ac3a-dfba-44f3-aa30-90fd2d8e7eb9","order_by":1,"name":"Astawus Esatu¹","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"¹Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Astawus","middleName":"","lastName":"Esatu¹","suffix":""},{"id":617601196,"identity":"3d29997f-380b-4562-b769-9600bcc275bf","order_by":2,"name":"Girma Debeli1","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"¹Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Girma","middleName":"","lastName":"Debeli1","suffix":""},{"id":617601197,"identity":"7666f292-8380-45f1-b220-cb2dfebd41cf","order_by":3,"name":"Hassen Seid¹","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"¹Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hassen","middleName":"","lastName":"Seid¹","suffix":""},{"id":617601198,"identity":"5bc0d4f1-cfcc-434a-b3ee-7d936caa4a96","order_by":4,"name":"Hayilu Mengistu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"¹Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hayilu","middleName":"","lastName":"Mengistu","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-04-04 16:53:13","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9322004/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9322004/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":106404148,"identity":"60b51a06-1253-499c-8ddc-348cfa25335c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-08 09:15:32","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":447574,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eTreated seed placed in laminar hood during working hours\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNaOH induced rapid, uniform dark brown reactions in most varieties, whereas KOH produced moderate reddish-brown reactions. Phenol responses were inconsistent, supporting its limited use as a supplementary test.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9322004/v1/e98350b9639f29a2ca61899b.png"},{"id":106406107,"identity":"83f03016-b855-4ab4-8ba2-409715f81a98","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-08 09:29:50","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2003741,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9322004/v1/1ec40cc9-2693-48ca-8bb2-225cd36d86f6.pdf"},{"id":106346615,"identity":"3955f435-6c93-4c04-80fa-6d34e4d0d187","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-07 16:32:34","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":2325257,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"GraphicalabstractforGP.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9322004/v1/038abc3e1ffc2aeec0fe6d14.png"},{"id":106403653,"identity":"4f194ba1-e89b-4940-9e1b-19b24c43ed85","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-08 09:14:42","extension":"docx","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":101003,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Graph1.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9322004/v1/bc7503bc999c24f70caddc08.docx"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Identification of Reliable Biochemical Seed Tests for Genetic Purity Determination in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eBread wheat (\u003cem\u003eTriticum aestivum\u003c/em\u003e L.) is one of the most widely cultivated cereal crops globally, providing a major source of carbohydrates, protein, and essential micronutrients for human populations (Shewry et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; FAO, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Its adaptability to diverse agro-ecologies, high yield potential, and market value make it a staple crop in many countries, including Ethiopia, where it contributes significantly to food security and household income (Alemayehu et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Tadesse et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; CSA, 2019). The quality and uniformity of wheat seed directly affect crop performance, grain marketability, and end-use quality, making seed quality management a critical component of sustainable wheat production (Copeland \u0026amp; McDonald, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e; Bewley et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). Early-generation seeds, such as breeder, pre-basic, and basic seed, are particularly sensitive to genetic contamination, as even minor admixtures can compromise varietal purity, reduce yield stability, and negatively influence agronomic and end-use traits (ISTA, 2023; Singh et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Tekalign et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTraditional approaches to evaluating genetic purity, including morphological grow-out tests and phenotypic comparisons, are widely used but often labor-intensive, time-consuming, and sometimes inconclusive due to environmental influences on trait expression (Copeland \u0026amp; McDonald, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e; Ellis \u0026amp; Roberts, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1980\u003c/span\u003e; Bewley et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). While molecular markers such as simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) provide high-resolution varietal discrimination, their routine application in seed quality laboratories remains limited due to high costs, need for specialized equipment, and the requirement for skilled personnel (Prasad, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e; Velu et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Consequently, alternative methods that balance accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and operational simplicity are necessary, particularly for resource-limited laboratories involved in early-generation seed production.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBiochemical seed tests, including phenol, sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and potassium hydroxide (KOH) assays, have emerged as practical tools for genetic purity assessment (Banerjee \u0026amp; Chandra, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1977\u003c/span\u003e; Mukhtar et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e). These tests exploit genetically controlled variations in seed coat composition, such as phenolic content, enzyme activity, and pigment presence, which result in differential color reactions among varieties (Shewry et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; Shewry \u0026amp; Hey, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). NaOH and KOH typically induce rapid brown to reddish-brown reactions, reflecting inherent biochemical differences, while phenol oxidase activity produces progressive brown coloration over several hours (Banerjee \u0026amp; Chandra, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1977\u003c/span\u003e; Shewry et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). Several studies have confirmed that these assays are rapid, inexpensive, and reproducible, providing a viable alternative to more complex molecular methods (Mukhtar et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e; Shewry \u0026amp; Hey, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Velu et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite their documented utility in cereal crops, systematic evaluations of these biochemical tests for Ethiopian bread wheat varieties remain limited (Alemayehu et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Tadesse et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Copeland \u0026amp; McDonald, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e). Comparative studies examining the speed, intensity, and reliability of NaOH, KOH, and phenol reactions are particularly scarce, highlighting a knowledge gap in practical genetic purity assessment under local laboratory conditions (ISTA, 2023; Shewry et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; Banerjee \u0026amp; Chandra, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1977\u003c/span\u003e; Mukhtar et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e; Velu et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Understanding the relative effectiveness of these tests will enable seed quality laboratories to adopt rapid, cost-effective, and reproducible methods, ultimately improving the efficiency of early-generation wheat seed production and maintaining the integrity of certified seed lots.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study aimed to:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003col\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eEvaluate the effectiveness of phenol, NaOH, and KOH biochemical tests for varietal discrimination in bread wheat.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuantify differences in physical and physiological seed quality traits prior to biochemical testing.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eIdentify the most reliable and practical biochemical test for routine genetic purity assessment in early-generation wheat seed production.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003c/ol\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. Materials and Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.1 Study Location\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe study was conducted at the Seed Laboratory of Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center (KARC), Ethiopia (8\u0026deg;01\u0026prime;N, 39\u0026deg;09\u0026prime;E; 2,200 m a.s.l.), during August 2025. The region has a sub-humid agro-ecology, with average maximum and minimum temperatures of 23\u0026deg;C and 11\u0026deg;C, respectively, and mean relative humidity of 65%. Total rainfall in August exceeded 120 mm, providing favorable conditions for seed quality assessments.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2 Seed Materials\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eCertified pre-basic seed lots of sixteen bread wheat varieties were obtained from KARC. Seed lots were homogenized using a seed divider and stored in moisture-proof bags at controlled temperature until testing. Working samples of 100 g per replicate were prepared following ISTA (2023) and AOSA (2023) protocols. Seeds were surface-sterilized in 0.5% sodium hypochlorite for 2 minutes, rinsed in sterile distilled water, and air-dried briefly before biochemical assays.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBread wheat varieties used in the study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVariety Code\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVariety Name\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSeed Class\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBoru\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-basic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eShaki\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-basic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDaka\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-basic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAbay\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-basic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBiftu\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-basic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBalcha\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-basic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKulumsa\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-basic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAsgori\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-basic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKekeba\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-basic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLemu\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-basic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDanda\u0026rsquo;a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-basic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKingbird\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-basic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDursa\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-basic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eShorima\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-basic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWane\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-basic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePaven\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-basic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3 Experimental Design\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe laboratory experiment was laid out in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with 16 varieties and two replications for biochemical assays. Each experimental unit consisted of 50 seeds in a 9 cm Petri dish, with negative controls included for each test. Physiological trait evaluation was performed in three replications.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.4 Seed Quality Assessments\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.4.1 Physical and Physiological Traits\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eGermination (%)\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eSeeds were incubated on moist paper at 20\u0026ndash;25\u0026deg;C for 8 days, counting normal seedlings following ISTA (2023) rules.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eMoisture Content (%)\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eDetermined on a wet basis using a digital seed moisture tester following the standard procedures recommended by the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eHectoliter Weight (kg hL⁻\u0026sup1;)\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003e Measured by weighing a known volume of clean seed samples using a standard hectoliter weight apparatus according to the methods of the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003ePhysical Purity (%)\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eEstimated as the proportion of pure seed relative to total sample weight, excluding inert matter.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.4.2 Biochemical Tests\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003ePhenol Test\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eSeeds were soaked in distilled water for 18\u0026ndash;24 h and then placed in a 1% phenol solution. Seed coat color reactions were recorded using a 0\u0026ndash;3 scale at 15 min, 1 h, 3 h, and 24 h following standard seed identification procedures described by the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) and previous studies on wheat varietal identification (Copeland \u0026amp; McDonald, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eNaOH Test\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eSeeds were immersed in a 1% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution for 5\u0026ndash;10 min for rapid assessment or up to 3 h for full reaction development. Seed coat color intensity was scored on a 0\u0026ndash;3 scale according to biochemical seed testing protocols used for wheat variety differentiation (McDonald \u0026amp; Copeland, 1997).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eKOH Test\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eSeeds were soaked in a 5% potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution for 3 h. Development of reddish-brown to brown coloration on the seed coat was considered a positive reaction and used for varietal distinction (ISTA, 2023).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eControl Treatment\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eNegative controls consisted of seeds soaked in distilled water to verify that color reactions were due to chemical reagents rather than hydration effects. Observations were conducted under consistent lighting conditions and enhanced using magnification lenses. Photographic documentation was taken to record seed coat reactions across all varieties.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.5 Data Collection and Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor each plate and variety, the number of seeds showing color reactions (nil, light brown, brown, dark brown) was recorded. Percent reaction and photographic records were documented. ANOVA was performed using R software (latest version) under CRD procedures, and mean separation was conducted with LSD at P\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;0.05.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe statistical model used:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eYij\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;\u0026micro;\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Ti\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;εij Where:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eYij\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;is the observed value of the physical seed quality parameter for the \u003cem\u003ejᵗʰ\u003c/em\u003e replicate of the \u003cem\u003eiᵗʰ\u003c/em\u003e treatment;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026micro; represents the overall mean of the observations;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eTi​ denotes the fixed effect of the \u003cem\u003eiᵗʰ\u003c/em\u003e treatment; and\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eεij​ is the random experimental error, assumed to be independently and normally distributed with mean zero and constant variance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"3. Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.1 Physical and Physiological Seed Quality\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eANOVA revealed highly significant varietal differences (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) in germination, moisture content, hectoliter weight, and physical purity (Table\u0026nbsp;2).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnalysis of variance (ANOVA) for physical seed quality parameters\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"15\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c8\" colnum=\"8\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c9\" colnum=\"9\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c10\" colnum=\"10\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c11\" colnum=\"11\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c12\" colnum=\"12\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c13\" colnum=\"13\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c14\" colnum=\"14\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c15\" colnum=\"15\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSource of Variation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDF\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGermination (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMoisture Content (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHectoliter Weight (kg hL⁻\u0026sup1;)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePhysical Purity (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c14\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c15\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSS\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eMS\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eF\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSS\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eMS\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eF\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSS\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eMS\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eF\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSS\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c14\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eMS\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c15\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eF\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTreatments\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSST₁\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMST₁\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e***\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSST₂\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMST₂\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e***\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSST₃\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMST₃\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e***\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSST₄\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c14\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMST₄\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c15\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e***\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eError\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eN\u0026ndash;18\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSSE₁\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMSE₁\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026mdash;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSSE₂\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMSE₂\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026mdash;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSSE₃\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMSE₃\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026mdash;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSSE₄\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c14\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMSE₄\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c15\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026mdash;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTotal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eN\u0026ndash;1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSSTotal₁\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026mdash;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026mdash;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSSTotal₂\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026mdash;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026mdash;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSSTotal₃\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026mdash;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026mdash;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSSTotal₄\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c14\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026mdash;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c15\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026mdash;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"15\"\u003e\u003cb\u003eWhere\u003c/b\u003e:\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"15\"\u003e\u0026not; SS\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Sum of Squares\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"15\"\u003e\u0026not; MS\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Mean Square (SS / DF)\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"15\"\u003e\u0026not; F\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;MST / MSE\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"15\"\u003e\u0026not; *** = Significant at \u003cb\u003eP\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean performance showed germination ranging 79.75\u0026ndash;92.75%, moisture content 10.60\u0026ndash;13.80%, HLW 35.16\u0026ndash;52.70 kg hL⁻\u0026sup1;, and purity\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;97% across all varieties (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). Varieties BW14, BW16, and BW3 had superior germination, while BW2 and BW13 exhibited high HLW.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eGermination Percentage\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe ANOVA indicated \u003cb\u003ehighly significant differences (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001)\u003c/b\u003e among treatments for germination percentage. The large treatment sum of squares relative to the error sum of squares resulted in a very high F-value, demonstrating that treatment effects accounted for most of the observed variability. This agrees with reports that seed cleaning and handling practices strongly influence wheat seed viability (Copeland \u0026amp; McDonald, 2019; ISTA, 2023).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eMoisture Content (%)\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMoisture content showed highly significant variation (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) among treatments. The high treatment mean square compared with the low error mean square indicates that treatments significantly affected seed moisture equilibrium. Similar findings have been reported by Ellis and Roberts (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1980\u003c/span\u003e) and Bewley et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e), who emphasized moisture content as a critical factor determining seed quality and storability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eHectoliter Weight (HLW)\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHighly significant differences (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) were observed for hectoliter weight, reflecting the strong influence of treatments on grain density and physical soundness. The high treatment sum of squares suggests that cleaning and handling methods substantially improved kernel uniformity and bulk density. This result is consistent with earlier findings in wheat by Shewry et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e) and Suleiman et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003ePhysical Purity (%)\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePhysical purity was also significantly affected (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) by treatments, although the treatment sum of squares was relatively lower compared to germination and HLW. This indicates moderate but meaningful improvement in purity through treatment application. Comparable results have been documented under seed certification and quality control studies (FAO, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; ISTA, 2023)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe merged ANOVA clearly demonstrates that treatments had highly significant effects on all physical seed quality parameters. The relatively low error mean squares across traits indicate good experimental precision, while the large treatment mean squares confirm strong treatment effects.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 4\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean Performance of Wheat Varieties for Physical Seed Quality Parameters\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"6\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVariety\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGermination (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMC (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHLW (kg hL⁻\u0026sup1;)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePhysical Purity (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e92.75 a\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.60 bc\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e39.33 cd\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e98.91 cd\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e92.25 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.90 ab\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e37.30 d\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e99.58 ab\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e91.75 ab\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11.70 de\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e37.50 d\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e99.42 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e90.50 bc\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.13 cd\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e46.30 ab\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e99.50 ab\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e89.60 cd\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.80 ab\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e44.90 bc\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e99.44 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e89.25 cd\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e10.60 f\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e38.03 d\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e99.60 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e88.25 de\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.60 bc\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e46.80 ab\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e99.30 bc\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e88.25 de\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e13.80 a\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e41.43 c\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e99.63 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e88.00 de\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13.00 ab\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e47.83 a\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e99.47 ab\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e87.00 ef\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.90 ab\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e42.00 c\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e99.50 ab\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e86.75 fg\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.60 bc\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e52.70 a\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e99.80 a\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e86.75 fg\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.50 bc\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e39.70 cd\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e99.38 bc\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e86.00 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.60 bc\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e35.16 e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e99.08 cd\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e85.50 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.90 ab\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e41.60 c\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e98.80 d\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e81.75 h\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.80 ab\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e39.00 cd\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e97.00 e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e79.75 i\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11.56 e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e39.60 cd\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e98.56 d\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"6\"\u003e\u003cb\u003eNotes\u003c/b\u003e:\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eMeans followed by the same letter within a column are \u003cb\u003enot significantly different\u003c/b\u003e at P\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;0.05 (LSD).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eGermination (%) indicates viable seed proportion; MC (%) = moisture content; HLW\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;hectoliter weight; Physical purity (%) reflects clean, pure seeds free of inert matter.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eGermination Percentage\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGermination percentage ranged from \u003cb\u003e79.75% (BW15)\u003c/b\u003e to \u003cb\u003e92.75% (BW14)\u003c/b\u003e. Varieties BW14, BW16, and BW3 formed the \u003cb\u003etop statistical group\u003c/b\u003e, indicating superior physiological seed quality. The poor performance of BW15 and BW12 may be linked to varietal genetic differences and sensitivity to post-harvest handling. Similar varietal variation in wheat germination has been reported by \u003cb\u003eCopeland \u0026amp; McDonald (2019)\u003c/b\u003e and \u003cb\u003eISTA (2023)\u003c/b\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eMoisture Content (MC%)\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMoisture content varied significantly among varieties, with \u003cb\u003eBW6 recording the lowest moisture (10.60%)\u003c/b\u003e, which is desirable for safe storage. Conversely, \u003cb\u003eBW9 showed the highest moisture content (13.80%)\u003c/b\u003e, potentially increasing the risk of deterioration during storage. These findings agree with Ellis and Roberts (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1980\u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003e)\u003c/b\u003e, who emphasized moisture as a primary determinant of seed longevity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eHectoliter Weight (HLW)\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHectoliter weight ranged from \u003cb\u003e35.16 kg hL⁻\u0026sup1; (BW10)\u003c/b\u003e to \u003cb\u003e52.70 kg hL⁻\u0026sup1; (BW2)\u003c/b\u003e. Varieties BW2 and BW13 exhibited significantly higher HLW, reflecting better grain density and physical soundness. This result aligns with wheat quality studies by Shewry et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e) and Suleiman et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003ePhysical Purity (%)\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePhysical purity exceeded \u003cb\u003e97% for all varieties\u003c/b\u003e, meeting international seed quality standards. BW2, BW6, and BW9 recorded the highest purity values (\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;99.6%), indicating effective cleaning and minimal inert matter. Lower purity observed in BW12 confirms varietal differences in seed lot cleanliness, consistent with FAO (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003e)\u003c/b\u003e and \u003cb\u003eISTA (2023)\u003c/b\u003e recommendations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.2 Biochemical Test Responses\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean reaction scores over 6 hours showed NaOH as the most effective (mean 1.93), followed by KOH (1.55), and phenol (0.95) (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). Control seeds showed no color change.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab4\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 5\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean Response across all treatments\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"7\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e#\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTest Method\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAfter 1 hr\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAfter 3 hrs\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAfter 6 hrs\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEffectiveness Rank\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNaOH\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.78a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.00a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.00a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.93\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1 (Best)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKOH\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.34b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.66b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.66b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.55\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePhenol\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.19bc\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.66c\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.95\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3 (Weakest)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eSodium Hydroxide (NaOH)\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eProduced the strongest and fastest reactions, with mean scores increasing from \u003cb\u003e0.78 after 1 hr \u0026rarr; 2.00 after 3 hrs \u0026rarr; 3.00 after 6 hrs\u003c/b\u003e. This indicates a rapid and consistent color change in the seed coat, reflecting high sensitivity in detecting varietal differences.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003ePotassium Hydroxide (KOH)\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eShowed moderate reactions, with scores rising from \u003cb\u003e0.34 \u0026rarr; 1.66 \u0026rarr; 2.66\u003c/b\u003e over the incubation periods, indicating good but slightly slower or weaker reaction intensity compared to NaOH.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003ePhenol\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eExhibited the weakest and most variable responses (\u003cb\u003e0.0 \u0026rarr; 1.19 \u0026rarr; 1.66\u003c/b\u003e), suggesting limited reliability for genetic purity assessment under the tested conditions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eControl (distilled water and sterilized only)\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eMaintained a consistent score of \u003cb\u003e0\u003c/b\u003e across all time points, confirming that observed reactions were due to chemical reagents rather than environmental factors. One irregular case (BW14) demonstrated the importance of replicates in detecting anomalies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eTreatment-level observations\u003c/b\u003e:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMost wheat varieties reached approximately \u003cb\u003e2\u0026ndash;3 reaction scores by 6 hours\u003c/b\u003e, though the speed of color development varied depending on the chemical reagent. NaOH consistently induced a strong reaction in nearly all seeds, while KOH was slightly less intense, and phenol showed uneven responses across varieties.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGraph.1 Reaction score for different tests\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNaOH induced rapid, uniform dark brown reactions in most varieties, whereas KOH produced moderate reddish-brown reactions. Phenol responses were inconsistent, supporting its limited use as a supplementary test.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.3 Correlation between Seed quality and biochemical test reliability\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eHigh quality seed lots (high germination, low moisture, high purity) corresponded to clearer biochemical reactions, suggesting that uniform physiological and physical seed quality enhances test reliability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"4. Discussion","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.1 Physical and Physiological Seed Quality Traits\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe significant differences observed among treatments for germination percentage, moisture content, hectoliter weight (HLW), and physical purity indicate that seed quality characteristics vary among bread wheat varieties. Such variations are commonly attributed to genetic factors, physiological maturity at harvest, and differences in postharvest handling and seed processing practices.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe higher germination percentages recorded in treatments BW14 and BW16 (\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;92%) indicate superior physiological seed quality. High germination capacity generally reflects proper seed development, optimal harvesting time, and favorable postharvest management. These findings agree with classical seed science principles reported by Richard H. Ellis and Edward H. Roberts, who demonstrated that seed viability is strongly influenced by physiological maturity and storage conditions. Similar germination levels exceeding 90% have also been reported for certified bread wheat seed produced under well-managed conditions in Ethiopia (Alemayehu et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Tadesse et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). In contrast, treatments BW12 and BW15 showed comparatively lower germination values (\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;82%), which may be associated with differences in seed age, storage conditions, or mechanical damage during handling.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe variation observed in seed moisture content among treatments is consistent with the seed storage principles described by James F. Harrington, who emphasized that even small differences in moisture content can significantly affect seed longevity and storability. In the present study, most treatments exhibited moisture content below 12%, which falls within the safe storage range recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization and the International Seed Testing Association. Seeds within this moisture range are generally considered suitable for extended storage with minimal deterioration in quality.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDifferences in hectoliter weight among treatments further indicate variation in grain density and degree of kernel filling. HLW is widely recognized as an important indicator of grain quality and end-use performance. Treatments such as BW2 and BW13, which exhibited relatively higher HLW values, likely experienced better assimilate accumulation during grain development, resulting in well-filled kernels. These results are consistent with previous findings reported by Peter R. Shewry and colleagues, who noted that HLW is closely associated with kernel density and grain filling under favorable agronomic conditions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe generally high physical purity levels observed across treatments (\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;97%) demonstrate effective seed processing and cleaning. These values are consistent with international seed certification standards, which require high levels of physical purity for certified seed lots. According to the International Seed Testing Association, properly processed wheat seed typically exceeds 98% physical purity. The relatively higher purity recorded in treatment BW16 may reflect more efficient seed cleaning and grading operations, supporting findings reported in previous seed quality studies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.2 Biochemical Tests for Genetic Purity\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAmong the biochemical assays evaluated, the NaOH test proved to be the most effective for varietal differentiation due to its rapid reaction kinetics and strong color intensity. The NaOH solution produced clear and consistent seed coat color reactions across varieties, making it a practical and reliable tool for genetic purity assessment. The KOH test showed moderate effectiveness, producing distinguishable but less intense color reactions compared with NaOH. In contrast, the phenol test exhibited weaker and more variable responses among varieties, limiting its discriminatory power.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese findings are consistent with earlier studies on wheat and other cereal crops that reported the effectiveness of alkaline reagents for varietal identification. Research by P. Banerjee and S. Chandra demonstrated that sodium hydroxide reactions provide reliable differentiation among cereal genotypes. More recent investigations have similarly confirmed that NaOH-based assays can serve as a simple and rapid method for detecting varietal differences when molecular techniques are unavailable.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe relatively weak response observed in the phenol test may be attributed to variation in phenolic compounds present in the seed coat of different wheat genotypes. Since phenol reactions depend on enzymatic oxidation of phenolic substances, genotypes with lower phenolic content may produce limited or inconsistent color changes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOverall, the results indicate that the combined use of NaOH and KOH tests provides an efficient and cost-effective approach for routine genetic purity testing. This approach is particularly valuable for seed laboratories operating in resource-limited environments, where advanced molecular marker technologies such as SSRs and SNPs may not be readily accessible. Integrating biochemical seed tests with conventional physical and physiological quality assessments can therefore enhance the reliability of varietal identification and seed quality assurance in bread wheat production systems.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"5. Conclusions","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study demonstrates that biochemical seed tests provide a practical and reliable approach for assessing genetic purity in bread wheat, particularly in early-generation seed production systems where molecular methods may be limited by cost and infrastructure. Among the three tests evaluated, \u003cstrong\u003esodium hydroxide (NaOH)\u003c/strong\u003e proved to be the most effective, producing rapid, strong, and consistent seed coat color reactions that clearly differentiated wheat varieties. \u003cstrong\u003ePotassium hydroxide (KOH)\u003c/strong\u003e exhibited moderate and reproducible responses, making it suitable as a secondary or confirmatory test, while the \u003cstrong\u003ephenol test\u003c/strong\u003e showed weak and inconsistent reactions, limiting its reliability under the tested conditions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAnalysis of physical and physiological seed traits revealed significant varietal differences in \u003cstrong\u003egermination, moisture content, hectoliter weight, and physical purity\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e,\u003c/strong\u003e confirming that varietal selection and seed handling practices influence both seed quality and biochemical test performance. Varieties such as \u003cstrong\u003eBW14, BW16, BW3, and BW2\u003c/strong\u003e consistently exhibited superior seed quality, emphasizing the importance of integrating physical and physiological assessments with biochemical testing for accurate genetic purity determination.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn conclusion, \u003cstrong\u003eNaOH is recommended as the primary reagent for routine genetic purity testing of bread wheat\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e,\u003c/strong\u003e supported by KOH as a confirmatory method. Phenol may be used selectively for reference purposes. This combination offers a\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elow-cost, rapid, and reproducible strategy\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e suitable for resource-limited seed laboratories. Implementing these tests can strengthen seed certification programs, enhance the reliability of early-generation seed production, and ultimately contribute to the uniformity and productivity of bread wheat cultivars.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003ch2\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInstitutional Review Board Statement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable. This study did not involve human participants, animals, or endangered plant species.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInformed Consent Statement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData Availability Statement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe data presented in this study are available within the article. Additional raw data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConflicts of Interest\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare no conflict of interest.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgments\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors gratefully acknowledge the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) seed directorate and the Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center (KARC) for providing seed materials, laboratory facilities, and technical support. The authors also thank the Seed Laboratory staff of KARC for their assistance during sample preparation, biochemical testing, and data collection\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAlemayehu, F., Tadesse, W., \u0026amp; Tekalign, B. (2018). Seed quality and performance of improved bread wheat varieties in Ethiopia. \u003cem\u003eEthiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 28\u003c/em\u003e(2), 45\u0026ndash;59.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBanerjee, R., \u0026amp; Chandra, G. (1977). Biochemical tests for seed purity determination in cereals. \u003cem\u003eSeed Science and Technology, 5\u003c/em\u003e(1), 45\u0026ndash;53.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBewley, J. D., Bradford, K., Hilhorst, H., \u0026amp; Nonogaki, H. (2013). \u003cem\u003eSeeds: Physiology of development, germination and dormancy\u003c/em\u003e (3rd ed.). Springer, New York.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCSA (Central Statistical Agency). (2019). \u003cem\u003eAgricultural Sample Survey: Crop Production Forecast\u003c/em\u003e. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCopeland, L. O., \u0026amp; McDonald, M. B. (2001). \u003cem\u003ePrinciples of seed science and technology\u003c/em\u003e (4th ed.). Springer, New York.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eEllis, R. H., \u0026amp; Roberts, E. H. (1980). \u003cem\u003eImproved equations for the prediction of seed longevity\u003c/em\u003e. Annals of Botany, 45, 13\u0026ndash;30.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFAO. (2014). \u003cem\u003eSeed quality and certification standards\u003c/em\u003e. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFAO. (2018). \u003cem\u003eSeed cleaning and grading practices for cereal crops\u003c/em\u003e. FAO Technical Bulletin No. 42. Rome, Italy.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFAO. (2020). \u003cem\u003eFAO Statistical Yearbook: Food and Agriculture Data 2020\u003c/em\u003e. Rome, Italy.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHarrington, J. F. (1972). The effect of moisture content on seed storage. \u003cem\u003eSeed Science and Technology, 1\u003c/em\u003e, 251\u0026ndash;263.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eISTA (International Seed Testing Association). (2023). \u003cem\u003eInternational Rules for Seed Testing\u003c/em\u003e. ISTA, Bassersdorf, Switzerland.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKassahun, D., Mekonnen, A., \u0026amp; Tsegaye, T. (2019). Germination and seed quality assessment of bread wheat varieties under controlled storage conditions. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Plant Sciences, 14\u003c/em\u003e(3), 101\u0026ndash;112.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMukhtar, Z., Velu, G., \u0026amp; Shewry, P. R. (2025).\u0026nbsp;Comparative evaluation of biochemical seed tests for wheat genetic purity. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Cereal Science, 110\u003c/em\u003e, 103556.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u0026nbsp;Prasad, R. (2023). Application of molecular markers in cereal seed quality assessment. \u003cem\u003ePlant Breeding Reviews, 47\u003c/em\u003e, 215\u0026ndash;239.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u0026nbsp;Shewry, P. R., \u0026amp; Hey, S. J. (2015). The contribution of wheat to human diet and health. \u003cem\u003eFood and Energy Security, 4\u003c/em\u003e, 178\u0026ndash;202.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eShewry, P. R., Piironen, V., \u0026amp; Lampi, A.-M. (2013). Wheat grain quality and composition. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Cereal Science, 58\u003c/em\u003e(3), 221\u0026ndash;231.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u0026nbsp;Singh, R., Kumar, A., \u0026amp; Choudhary, M. (2016). Seed purity and certification in cereals. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Seed Science, 8\u003c/em\u003e(1), 12\u0026ndash;20.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSuleiman, S., Tadesse, W., \u0026amp; Alemayehu, F. (2021).\u0026nbsp;Hectoliter weight and grain density evaluation of bread wheat varieties in Ethiopia. \u003cem\u003eEthiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 31\u003c/em\u003e(1), 23\u0026ndash;35.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTadesse, W., Alemayehu, F., \u0026amp; Tekalign, B. (2020).\u0026nbsp;Seed quality evaluation of pre-basic wheat varieties in central Ethiopia. \u003cem\u003eAfrican Journal of Plant Science, 14\u003c/em\u003e(4), 121\u0026ndash;133.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTekalign, B., Mekonen, S., \u0026amp; Tadesse, W. (2017). Variation in wheat seed germination under storage and handling conditions. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Seed Technology, 39\u003c/em\u003e(2), 45\u0026ndash;54.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eVelu, G., Mukhtar, Z., \u0026amp; Shewry, P. R. (2023). Biochemical markers for rapid genetic purity testing in wheat. \u003cem\u003ePlant Genetic Resources, 21\u003c/em\u003e(3), 237\u0026ndash;245.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Graph 1","content":"\u003cp\u003eGraph 1 is available in the Supplementary Files section.\u003c/p\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Bread wheat, genetic purity, biochemical seed test, NaOH, KOH, phenol, seed quality","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9322004/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9322004/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eGenetic purity is a cornerstone of seed quality assurance, particularly in early-generation bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seed production. Molecular markers such as SSRs and SNPs provide high precision for varietal identification but remain largely inaccessible in resource-limited seed laboratories due to cost, technical expertise, and infrastructure requirements. Biochemical seed tests, including phenol, sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and potassium hydroxide (KOH), exploit genetically controlled seed coat reactions and offer rapid, cost-effective alternatives.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study evaluated the effectiveness of these three biochemical assays in determining genetic purity across sixteen pre-basic bread wheat varieties under a completely randomized laboratory design. Prior to biochemical testing, physical and physiological seed quality parameters germination percentage, moisture content, hectoliter weight, and physical purity were measured to ensure uniformity. Analysis of variance revealed highly significant varietal differences (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) for all physical traits.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAmong biochemical tests, NaOH exhibited the fastest, most intense, and consistent seed coat color reactions, followed by KOH, while phenol responses were weak and variable. The study confirms that NaOH, supported by KOH as a secondary assay, provides a reliable, reproducible, and low-cost approach for routine genetic purity testing in bread wheat, particularly suitable for seed laboratories in developing countries.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Identification of Reliable Biochemical Seed Tests for Genetic Purity Determination in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-04-07 16:32:18","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9322004/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"4e7f664b-9ef0-4fdc-80ed-31d2ab7264b6","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 7th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-07T16:32:18+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-04-07 16:32:18","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-9322004","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-9322004","identity":"rs-9322004","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00