Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

German general practitioners frequently recommend osteopathy despite limited knowledge, with female gender and personal treatment experience associated with more frequent recommendations.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17 · read from full text

This nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire surveyed a random sample of 1000 German general practitioners (GPs) about their demographics, personal experiences with osteopathy, beliefs/attitudes toward it, and how often they recommend or refer patients, including perceived effectiveness across indications and patient groups. Among respondents (34.4% response rate), 91.3% had referred patients to an osteopath and 88.0% had recommended osteopathy, but 57.5% reported little or no knowledge about osteopathy; the most common perceived targets were spinal column disorders, other musculoskeletal complaints, and headaches. Female gender and having personal treatment experience were independently associated with more frequent recommending, while the study used self-designed attitude scores and logistic regression as analytical tools. The paper’s key limitation is the self-reported, cross-sectional design with a modest response rate and no external validation of knowledge or recommendation quality. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Osteopathy is a type of complementary medicine based on specific manual techniques. In many countries, including Germany, the profession is not officially regulated, and evidence for the effectiveness of osteopathy is insufficient for most diseases. Nevertheless, many health insurances in Germany offer reimbursement for therapy costs, if osteopathy is recommended by a physician. This cross-sectional survey of German general practitioners (GPs) explored beliefs and attitudes towards osteopathic medicine and described their daily interactions with it. Methods: : A random sample of 1000 GPs from all federal states was surveyed by mail using a self-designed questionnaire. We collected data on sociodemographics, personal experiences with osteopathy, and attitudes and expectations towards osteopathy. In particular, participants were asked about indications for osteopathic treatment and their beliefs about its effectiveness for different patient groups and diagnoses. A self-designed score was used to estimate general attitudes towards osteopathy and identify factors correlated with greater openness. Additionally, we performed logistic regression to reveal factors associated with the frequency of recommending osteopathy to patients. Results: : Response rate was 34.4%. 46.5% of participants were women, and the median age was 56.0 years. 91.3% of GPs had referred patients to an osteopath, and 88.0% had recommended osteopathy to their patients. However, 57.5% acknowledged having little or no knowledge about osteopathy. Most frequent reasons for a recommendation were spinal column disorders (46.2%), other complaints of the musculoskeletal system (18.2%) and headaches (9.8%). GPs estimated the highest benefit for chronically ill and middle-aged adults. Female gender (OR 2.09; 95%CI 1.29-3.38) and personal treatment experiences (OR 5.14; 95%CI 2.72-9.72) were independently positively associated with more frequent treatment recommendation. Conclusion: GPs in Germany have frequent contact with osteopathy, and the vast majority have recommended osteopathic treatment to some extent in their practice, with foci and opinions comparable to other Western countries. The discrepancy between GPs making frequent referrals for osteopathic treatment while self-assessing to have little knowledge about it demonstrates need for intensified research on the collaboration with osteopaths and how to best integrate osteopathic treatments. Our results may help to focus future effectiveness studies on most relevant clinical conditions in general practice.
Full text 20,025 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey Gordian Lukas Schmid, Jeremias Kluge, Tobias Deutsch, Anne-Kathrin Geier, and 3 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-424591/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 07 Oct, 2021 Read the published version in BMC Family Practice → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background: Osteopathy is a type of complementary medicine based on specific manual techniques. In many countries, including Germany, the profession is not officially regulated, and evidence for the effectiveness of osteopathy is insufficient for most diseases. Nevertheless, many health insurances in Germany offer reimbursement for therapy costs, if osteopathy is recommended by a physician. This cross-sectional survey of German general practitioners (GPs) explored beliefs and attitudes towards osteopathic medicine and described their daily interactions with it. Methods: A random sample of 1000 GPs from all federal states was surveyed by mail using a self-designed questionnaire. We collected data on sociodemographics, personal experiences with osteopathy, and attitudes and expectations towards osteopathy. In particular, participants were asked about indications for osteopathic treatment and their beliefs about its effectiveness for different patient groups and diagnoses. A self-designed score was used to estimate general attitudes towards osteopathy and identify factors correlated with greater openness. Additionally, we performed logistic regression to reveal factors associated with the frequency of recommending osteopathy to patients. Results: Response rate was 34.4%. 46.5% of participants were women, and the median age was 56.0 years. 91.3% of GPs had referred patients to an osteopath, and 88.0% had recommended osteopathy to their patients. However, 57.5% acknowledged having little or no knowledge about osteopathy. Most frequent reasons for a recommendation were spinal column disorders (46.2%), other complaints of the musculoskeletal system (18.2%) and headaches (9.8%). GPs estimated the highest benefit for chronically ill and middle-aged adults. Female gender (OR 2.09; 95%CI 1.29-3.38) and personal treatment experiences (OR 5.14; 95%CI 2.72-9.72) were independently positively associated with more frequent treatment recommendation. Conclusion: GPs in Germany have frequent contact with osteopathy, and the vast majority have recommended osteopathic treatment to some extent in their practice, with foci and opinions comparable to other Western countries. The discrepancy between GPs making frequent referrals for osteopathic treatment while self-assessing to have little knowledge about it demonstrates need for intensified research on the collaboration with osteopaths and how to best integrate osteopathic treatments. Our results may help to focus future effectiveness studies on most relevant clinical conditions in general practice. General Practice Osteopathic Medicine General Practice Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Complementary Alternative Medicine Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Full Text Due to technical limitations, full-text HTML conversion of this manuscript could not be completed. However, the manuscript can be downloaded and accessed as a PDF. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files SupplementarymaterialOsteopathyinGermanyJK.pdf Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 07 Oct, 2021 Read the published version in BMC Family Practice → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-424591","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":24900437,"identity":"9586d42f-d74f-484d-baee-bba82c8bf08f","order_by":0,"name":"Gordian Lukas Schmid","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Selbstständige Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Leipzig","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Gordian","middleName":"Lukas","lastName":"Schmid","suffix":""},{"id":24900438,"identity":"b08c11cf-ccfc-4b84-8e91-afab5e014b65","order_by":1,"name":"Jeremias Kluge","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Selbstständige Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Leipzig","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jeremias","middleName":"","lastName":"Kluge","suffix":""},{"id":24900439,"identity":"a2719dd7-f583-44af-9bc6-e66fec1e1ee1","order_by":2,"name":"Tobias Deutsch","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Selbstständige Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Leipzig","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tobias","middleName":"","lastName":"Deutsch","suffix":""},{"id":24900440,"identity":"4da36dc4-9c49-4ac5-8ca1-51f2dbb6769f","order_by":3,"name":"Anne-Kathrin Geier","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Selbstständige Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Leipzig","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Anne-Kathrin","middleName":"","lastName":"Geier","suffix":""},{"id":24900441,"identity":"4c42b554-b75e-42a7-9009-e77219cf6cba","order_by":4,"name":"Markus Bleckwenn","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Selbstständige Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Leipzig","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Markus","middleName":"","lastName":"Bleckwenn","suffix":""},{"id":24900442,"identity":"f3d02cbf-28a3-42e4-98be-1a7d2a518e55","order_by":5,"name":"Susanne Unverzagt","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Susanne","middleName":"","lastName":"Unverzagt","suffix":""},{"id":24900443,"identity":"c52fb2c6-1c60-4e02-95f6-fb7bf954a17e","order_by":6,"name":"Thomas Frese","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Thomas","middleName":"","lastName":"Frese","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2021-04-15 07:14:10","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-424591/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-424591/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01545-2","type":"published","date":"2021-10-07T06:29:24+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":8801746,"identity":"4b4c9624-0dee-4606-813e-6f4a05b81821","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-05-05 14:00:41","extension":"jpg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":70572,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Sampling flow chart","description":"","filename":"1.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-424591/v1/aed88bdb07a6ef249d27d602.jpg"},{"id":8801745,"identity":"9fa4dbba-6f7d-49f2-8f01-1dafce980a76","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-05-05 14:00:41","extension":"jpg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":72800,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Open text reasons for encounter of most likely recommended clinical pictures for osteopathic treatment in % (n=450)","description":"","filename":"2.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-424591/v1/76c72560ce432bfa5808c95c.jpg"},{"id":8802407,"identity":"b35ea76e-6d49-4b1d-b3f7-e1e7e80118d3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-05-05 14:06:41","extension":"jpg","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":190608,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Expectations of benefit from osteopathic treatment for different pre-selected reasons for encounter via GPs self-assessment in % (n=344)","description":"","filename":"3.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-424591/v1/e0f07973d3e06308bbae9b17.jpg"},{"id":8802157,"identity":"f09db01a-c04f-4225-8941-f504b032a2ff","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-05-05 14:03:41","extension":"jpg","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":103687,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Expectations of benefit from osteopathic treatment for different patient groups via GPs self-assessment in % (n=344)","description":"","filename":"4.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-424591/v1/2aee96fb59f9356785ea946b.jpg"},{"id":8802156,"identity":"b4ba798d-4f5e-4259-af41-3e4699aa3c5e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-05-05 14:03:41","extension":"jpg","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":118007,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\"How do you agree with the following statements?” answers in % from all GPs (n=344)","description":"","filename":"5.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-424591/v1/1b989214ab069aa1c3400d05.jpg"},{"id":18553049,"identity":"71e444ab-79b7-4821-b261-a067add2f4a6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-02-24 06:29:38","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":931870,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SubmissionPaperOsteopathyinGermanyJKfinal.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-424591/v1_covered.pdf"},{"id":13628357,"identity":"4962bb37-1e55-4b4c-b5f6-2973936c5cab","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-09-17 07:59:12","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":926629,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SubmissionPaperOsteopathyinGermanyJKfinal.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-424591/v1_covered.pdf"},{"id":8802826,"identity":"e80d161c-e89b-4544-ad35-aec1ff9a0a6b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-05-05 14:09:48","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":653639,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SubmissionPaperOsteopathyinGermanyJKfinal.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-424591/v1_stamped.pdf"},{"id":8802408,"identity":"059460fd-89fd-43c9-8481-fe8105510cdb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-05-05 14:06:42","extension":"pdf","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":383647,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementarymaterialOsteopathyinGermanyJK.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-424591/v1/c8746b1364d2a0e9a38c31f5.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey","fulltext":[{"header":"Full Text","content":"\u003cp\u003eDue to technical limitations, full-text HTML conversion of this manuscript could not be completed. However, the manuscript can be downloaded and accessed as a PDF.\u003c/p\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Osteopathic Medicine, General Practice, Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment, Complementary Alternative Medicine","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-424591/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-424591/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground:\u003c/strong\u003e Osteopathy is a type of complementary medicine based on specific manual techniques. In many countries, including Germany, the profession is not officially regulated, and evidence for the effectiveness of osteopathy is insufficient for most diseases. Nevertheless, many health insurances in Germany offer reimbursement for therapy costs, if osteopathy is recommended by a physician. This cross-sectional survey of German general practitioners (GPs) explored beliefs and attitudes towards osteopathic medicine and described their daily interactions with it. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods: \u003c/strong\u003eA random sample of 1000 GPs from all federal states was surveyed by mail using a self-designed questionnaire. We collected data on sociodemographics, personal experiences with osteopathy, and attitudes and expectations towards osteopathy. In particular, participants were asked about indications for osteopathic treatment and their beliefs about its effectiveness for different patient groups and diagnoses. A self-designed score was used to estimate general attitudes towards osteopathy and identify factors correlated with greater openness. Additionally, we performed logistic regression to reveal factors associated with the frequency of recommending osteopathy to patients. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults: \u003c/strong\u003eResponse rate was 34.4%. 46.5% of participants were women, and the median age was 56.0 years. 91.3% of GPs had referred patients to an osteopath, and 88.0% had recommended osteopathy to their patients. However, 57.5% acknowledged having little or no knowledge about osteopathy. Most frequent reasons for a recommendation were spinal column disorders (46.2%), other complaints of the musculoskeletal system (18.2%) and headaches (9.8%). GPs estimated the highest benefit for chronically ill and middle-aged adults. Female gender (OR 2.09; 95%CI 1.29-3.38) and personal treatment experiences (OR 5.14; 95%CI 2.72-9.72) were independently positively associated with more frequent treatment recommendation.\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusion:\u003c/strong\u003e GPs in Germany have frequent contact with osteopathy, and the vast majority have recommended osteopathic treatment to some extent in their practice, with foci and opinions comparable to other Western countries. The discrepancy between GPs making frequent referrals for osteopathic treatment while self-assessing to have little knowledge about it demonstrates need for intensified research on the collaboration with osteopaths and how to best integrate osteopathic treatments. Our results may help to focus future effectiveness studies on most relevant clinical conditions in general practice.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2021-05-05 14:00:39","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-424591/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"34285805-0185-41d6-9755-1645046f1981","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 5th, 2021","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":4099947,"name":"General Practice"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2022-02-24T06:29:24+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-424591","link":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01545-2","journal":{"identity":"bmc-family-practice","isVorOnly":true,"title":"BMC Family Practice"},"publishedOn":"2021-10-07 06:29:24","publishedOnDateReadable":"October 7th, 2021"},"versionCreatedAt":"2021-05-05 14:00:39","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1186/s12875-021-01545-2","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01545-2","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-424591","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-424591","identity":"rs-424591","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"FbvkV6FR0MCFSLy54lSbu","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00