Guiding treatment response by spatiotemporal control of α-particle deposition in solid tumors: the case for ‘affinity cocktails’ of antibody-radioconjugates

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-17 ⓘ

Affinity cocktails of antibody-radioconjugates, combining high-affinity for vasculature-proximal cells and lower-affinity for deeper tumor penetration, significantly improved tumor growth inhibition in preclinical models compared to high-affinity agents alone.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Antibody-radioconjugates are leading the investigational targeted alpha-particle (α-particle) therapies for the treatment of solid tumors that do not respond to approved therapies. Yet, there is still treatment failure in the clinic largely attributed to the heterogenous patterns of tumor irradiation by α-particles. Although α-particles are essentially impervious to resistance, attributed to the complex double-strand DNA breaks they cause while traversing cells, cells not being directly hit by α-particles will likely not be killed. The diffusion-limited poor tumor penetration of high-affinity (strongly-binding) antibody-radioconjugates combined with α-particles’ short-range in tissue (only 40-80μm), let tumor regions far from vasculature inadequately irradiated, therefore, possibly escaping treatment. METHODS To improve penetration of delivered activity within tumors, we engineered separate actinium-225 antibody-radioconjugates of variable affinities (‘affinity cocktails’) targeting the same marker on cancer cells, that were chosen based on their preferential irradiation of complementary regions of the same tumors. The cocktails comprise: (a) ‘high-affinity’ antibody-radioconjugates (as the ones on clinical trials), which mostly deliver their cargo in tumor cells close to the vasculature, where the ‘low(er)-affinity’ antibody-radioconjugates fail to deliver effective doses, due to their fast clearance; and (b) ‘low(er)-affinity’ antibody-radioconjugates, that penetrate the deeper parts of tumors farther from the vasculature, where the ‘high-affinity’ antibodies fail to reach. The efficacy of affinity cocktails was assessed in spheroids, that were employed as surrogates of tumor avascular regions, and on mice with subcutaneous xenografts of different cancer origin, expression levels and/or type of the targeted receptor: HER2 highly-expressing BT-474 breast cancer cells, HER2 moderately-expressing HEPG2 hepatoma cells, and/or HER1 low-expressing BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer cells. RESULTS Although the high-affinity antibody-radioconjugates were most lethal against cancer cells in monolayers, affinity cocktails were most effective in inhibiting spheroid growth, due to better collective spreading of the antibody-conjugates within the spheroids’ volume. On all mouse models, and for the same total injected activity, affinity cocktails resulted in the best tumor growth inhibition, even at lower tumor absorbed doses, compared to the high-affinity antibody-radioconjugates alone. CONCLUSIONS This proof-of-concept study in α-particle antibody-delivery to solid tumors demonstrates that ‘separating’ the two key processes of diffusion and reaction/binding improves treatment efficacy. This generalizable approach may augment antibody-radioconjugates already in clinical trials.
Full text 2,901 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Antibody-radioconjugates are leading the investigational targeted alpha-particle (α-particle) therapies for the treatment of solid tumors that do not respond to approved therapies. Yet, there is still treatment failure in the clinic largely attributed to the heterogenous patterns of tumor irradiation by α-particles. Although α-particles are essentially impervious to resistance, attributed to the complex double-strand DNA breaks they cause while traversing cells, cells not being directly hit by α-particles will likely not be killed. The diffusion-limited poor tumor penetration of high-affinity (strongly-binding) antibody-radioconjugates combined with α-particles’ short-range in tissue (only 40-80μm), let tumor regions far from vasculature inadequately irradiated, therefore, possibly escaping treatment.

Methods

To improve penetration of delivered activity within tumors, we engineered separate actinium-225 antibody-radioconjugates of variable affinities (‘affinity cocktails’) targeting the same marker on cancer cells, that were chosen based on their preferential irradiation of complementary regions of the same tumors. The cocktails comprise: (a) ‘high-affinity’ antibody-radioconjugates (as the ones on clinical trials), which mostly deliver their cargo in tumor cells close to the vasculature, where the ‘low(er)-affinity’ antibody-radioconjugates fail to deliver effective doses, due to their fast clearance; and (b) ‘low(er)-affinity’ antibody-radioconjugates, that penetrate the deeper parts of tumors farther from the vasculature, where the ‘high-affinity’ antibodies fail to reach. The efficacy of affinity cocktails was assessed in spheroids, that were employed as surrogates of tumor avascular regions, and on mice with subcutaneous xenografts of different cancer origin, expression levels and/or type of the targeted receptor: HER2 highly-expressing BT-474 breast cancer cells, HER2 moderately-expressing HEPG2 hepatoma cells, and/or HER1 low-expressing BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer cells.

Results

Although the high-affinity antibody-radioconjugates were most lethal against cancer cells in monolayers, affinity cocktails were most effective in inhibiting spheroid growth, due to better collective spreading of the antibody-conjugates within the spheroids’ volume. On all mouse models, and for the same total injected activity, affinity cocktails resulted in the best tumor growth inhibition, even at lower tumor absorbed doses, compared to the high-affinity antibody-radioconjugates alone.

Conclusions

This proof-of-concept study in α-particle antibody-delivery to solid tumors demonstrates that ‘separating’ the two key processes of diffusion and reaction/binding improves treatment efficacy. This generalizable approach may augment antibody-radioconjugates already in clinical trials. Competing Interest Statement SS is inventor in a pending patent involving this work.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00