Does post-natal parental care influence cognitive development in a social gecko?

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,299 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

How cognition evolved remains a debated “hot-topic” in the field of animal cognition. Current hypotheses link variation in sociality, ecology, and more generally, environmental challenges to differences in cognitive development, both between as well as within species. Research supporting the Social Intelligence Hypothesis, which states that cognition evolved to deal with social challenges, is largely focused on highly social mammal and bird species, limiting our ability to evaluate the general applicability of the hypothesis. Unfortunately, developmental studies which can reveal the causal link between early life experiences and cognitive development are scare. The aim of this study was to test the effect of the early post-natal social environment on the development of neophobia, exploration, food motivation, habituation and associative learning in a social lizard, the tokay gecko (Gekko gecko). We did not find evidence that the early social rearing environment influenced object neophobia. However, our results show that the early social environment influenced the time taken to enter a novel space and the variation in associative learning. We discuss our findings in the light of the Social Intelligence Hypothesis taking into account the facultative sociality nature of our study system. Our study provides new insight into how cognitive benefits associated with group living might have promoted the evolution of more complex social structures in animals. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X27630 Subjects Behavior and Ethology, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Evolution, Life Sciences

Keywords

Behaviour, cognition, developmental plasticity, fearfulness, squamate, reptile, cognition, Developmental plasticity, fearfulness, squamate, reptile Dates Published: 2025-01-06 06:21 Last Updated: 2025-09-01 09:13 Older Versions License CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: The datasets generated and analysed during the current study as well as the code used for analysis are available in the Open Science framework repository, https://osf.io/6sp8b/?view_only=08bdb8d4916842a1a242144dd223bd7b Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00