Identifying knowledge gaps on simultaneous above- and belowground organism responses to global change.

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,871 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Global change affects all terrestrial organisms regardless if they live above or below the ground. Even though they are strongly linked by various direct and indirect interactions, organisms can respond very differently to global change stressors, due to different features of above- and belowground compartments. Many different organism groups have shown declines in diversity, abundance or biomass which goes hand in hand with the loss of important ecosystem services. However, to date, the extent to which above- and belowground organisms are studied simultaneously in global change research has not systematically been studied. This makes it difficult to assess knowledge gaps and research deficits in this area. Here we present a systematic literature overview on well-covered research areas and knowledge gaps on how global change stressors affect above- and belowground organisms in terrestrial ecosystems. We found an underrepresentation of tropical areas and non-agricultural ecosystems, like wetlands and deserts. For global change stressors we identified knowledge gaps on many aspects, including non-agricultural pollutants, extreme weather events, and direct exploitation, while we overall observed a strong focus on invertebrates compared to other organism groups. Many combinations of organism groups and stressors were poorly or not at all covered. Our results regarding study design and focal biodiversity metrics suggest a lack of studies investigating future scenarios as well as direct linkages of organism presence with ecosystem functioning. Closing the knowledge gaps that we identified will be the key to lift our knowledge from how single groups respond to global change to how whole communities and ecosystems will be altered. This knowledge could not only significantly improve conservation measures but might also offer relevant economic and societal benefits via agricultural advancements and provision of ecosystem services. https://doi.org/10.32942/X25T0F Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology terrestrial ecology, global change stressors, above-belowground organisms, bacteria, fungi, invertebrates, vertebrates Published: 2026-05-07 19:47 Last Updated: 2026-05-07 19:47 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Data and Code Availability Statement: The data and code used for analyses and creating figures is openly available on zenodo: 10.5281/zenodo.20038279. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00