Endometriosis after tubal ligation.

Fakih Hn, H N Fakih, R Tamura, Ralph K. Tamura, Andrew Kesselman, A Kesselman, A H DeCherney, DeCherney Ah
The Journal of reproductive medicine · 1985 · vol. 30(12) , pp. 939–41 · PMID:4078831 · W102593143
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

Endometriosis was diagnosed in 27.3% of 84 patients after tubal ligation, indicating it is not a chance finding in sterilized women.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Twenty-three (27.3%) of 84 patients discharged with the diagnosis of endometriosis had undergone tubal ligation 1-15 years (mean, 5) before this diagnosis was made. Twenty (87%) of the 23 underwent laparotomy because of symptoms consistent with endometriosis. Forty-four percent had stage I disease; 52%, stage II; and 4%, stage III. Endometriosis was the only pathologic finding in 19 women (82.6%). This study demonstrated that endometriosis is not a chance finding in women who have undergone tubal sterilization.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Postoperative Complications Sterilization, Tubal Adult Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Middle Aged Sterilization, Tubal Time Factors

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (2)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:22:48.782012+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:09:40.384591+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK