Endovaginal scanning of the endometrium compared to cytology and histology in women with postmenopausal bleeding
Diagnostic accuracy
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This study compared endovaginal ultrasound, cytology, and D&C in 105 women with postmenopausal bleeding, finding that ultrasound demonstrated 97% sensitivity and 81% specificity for detecting pathological endometrial conditions.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Endovaginal scanning (EVS) of the endometrium has recently been proposed as a method for the investigation of the endometrial mucosa. In this study, the specificity and sensitivity of EVS have been compared with endometrial cytology and D&C to discriminate between a normal and pathological endometrium. The study included 105 women who underwent preoperative endovaginal ultrasound investigation, endometrial cytology, and D&C because of postmenopausal bleeding. A specificity of 81% and a sensitivity of 97% in diagnosing morphological alterations by means of endovaginal ultrasound was found. The corresponding figures for cytological evaluation were 81 and 58%, respectively. We conclude that endovaginal ultrasound is a valuable diagnostic instrument for detecting pathological conditions in the uterine mucosa and as sensitive as endometrial cytology or D&C.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:59:31.578486+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK