Follow-up of atypical glandular cells in cervical-endocervical smears

other OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

This study investigated atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) in cervical smears, finding that while most diagnoses were benign, subclassification into "favor reactive" and "favor neoplasia" helped predict follow-up outcomes, with a notable percentage of preneoplastic and neoplastic diagnoses.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) is a diagnostic category of the Bethesda system encompassing glandular-type cells that show either endometrial or endocervical differentiation and display greater atypia than expected for a reactive process but do not meet the criteria for invasive adenocarcinoma. We investigated AGUS in a follow-up study of cervical-endocervical smears with either histology or repeat cytology follow-up. From the cytology files at Northwestern Memorial Hospital over a 4-year period, 136 cervical-endocervical smears were diagnosed with AGUS, which were further subdivided into atypical glandular cells, unqualified (AGC-U); atypical glandular cells, favor reactive (AGC-FR); or atypical glandular cells, favor neoplasia (AGC-FN). Of 96 cases with either histologic or cytologic (cervical-endocervical smear) follow-up, 39 cases of AGC-U had a variety of diagnoses on follow-up, with mostly benign entities in 72% and squamous intraepithelial lesions in 28%. Follow-up of the 36 cases of AGC-FR also demonstrated mostly benign entities (82%) and five cases of squamous intraepithelial lesions. The largest number of premalignant and malignant diagnoses (48%) was found during follow-up of patients with an initial diagnosis of AGC-FN, including the only two cases of adenocarcinoma in situ in our study. In conclusion, our study confirms that AGUS encompasses a wide spectrum of diagnoses, most of which prove to be benign. Subclassification of these cases into "favor reactive" and "favor neoplasia" was found to be helpful in predicting the follow-up status of these patients. However, the small but distinctive percentage of preneoplastic and neoplastic diagnoses seen on follow-up warrant further diagnostic procedures and/or close monitoring in patients with this diagnosis.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Cervix Uteri Conization Endometriosis Endometrium Exocrine Glands Uterine Cervical Diseases Adenocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma Cervix Uteri Conization Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometrium Exocrine Glands Female Follow-Up Studies Histocytochemistry Humans Laboratories

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:10:35.327253+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine