A prospective randomized single blinded study of office based evaluation of patients presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding using concurrent office hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy. does the order of the procedures matter?

Anthony N. Imudia, Robyn Schickler, Shayne Plosker, Emad Mikhail
In: Fertility and Sterility · 2016 · vol. 106(3) , pp. e43 · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.135 · W2513755076
article OA: closed CC0
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

This study prospectively randomized women with abnormal uterine bleeding to evaluate if concurrent office hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy order impacts diagnostic outcomes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK