Preoperative Bowel Preparation in Gynecologic Oncology

Tiffany Wells, Marie Plante, Jessica N. McAlpine
In: International Journal of Gynecological Cancer · 2011 · vol. 21(6) , pp. 1135–1142 · doi:10.1097/igc.0b013e31821778c4 · PMID:21633305 · W2018704813
article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-23 ⓘ

Despite no literature supporting its use, half of gynecologic oncologists routinely order preoperative bowel preparation for surgery, citing decreased anastomotic leak and improved visualization as reasons.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectivesPreoperative mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) is commonly used in gynecologic oncology (GO). We wished to assess the practice patterns and beliefs within the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists of Canada (GOC), review the literature on MBP as applicable to GO surgeries, and construct recommendations specific to our subspecialty.MethodsA 23-question, 10-minute Internet survey was sent to 110 GOC members regarding their use, rationale, and understanding of the literature pertaining to MBP for GO surgeries. The historical justifications for using MBP before pelvic and abdominal surgery were identified through literature review.ResultsHalf of respondents (48%) routinely order MBP despite acknowledgment in 77% that there was no good evidence to support its use. Use encompassed all cancer sites (53% ovary, 32% endometrial, 27% cervical, and 8% vulvar) and approaches (43% laparotomy and 29% laparoscopy/robotics). The most common reasons cited for ordering MBP were to decrease risk of anastomotic leak and improve visualization. In the last 5 years, use of MBP has decreased in most (77%) GOC respondents. Of all respondents, 71% felt that formal recommendations specific to the field of GO would be helpful. None of the arguments for using MBP could be justified in the literature. In contrast, common and often serious sequelae from MBP are frequently described. Admitted use of bowel preparation in other surgical specialties was even higher (53%-99%) than within the GOC.ConclusionsThere is no literature to support the routine use of MBP in GO. Published recommendations (herein) should support and guide change in practice.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

References (98)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK