Das internationale Endometriose Evaluations-Programm (IEEP) – eine Studie für Kliniker, Forscher und Patientinnen

In: Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2016 · vol. 76(10) · doi:10.1055/s-0036-1593102 · W2529992341
article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

The International Endometriosis Evaluation Programme (IEEP) aims to improve endometriosis diagnosis and treatment by validating biomarkers and collecting clinical follow-up data for this heterogeneous disease.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10

The paper describes the design and implementation of the International Endometriosis Evaluation Program (IEEP), a multicenter, online documentation system linked to a biobank to enable prospective case-control research on endometriosis heterogeneity and the lack of standardized diagnostic approaches and predictive biomarkers. Between June 2013 and June 2015, the system collected anamnestic and clinical data from 696 women, including 202 with endometriosis already known preoperatively and 494 newly diagnosed, with biomaterials available for 353 (50.7%). The authors present that this setup allows standardized clinical data collection alongside stored samples to support biomarker and follow-up research, while also enabling certification-related data collection. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically the development of a prospective international documentation and biobanking platform to study diagnosis, treatment, quality of life, and follow-up.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Zielsetzung: Das Erkrankungsbild der Endometriose ist sehr heterogen. Symptome wie Infertilität oder Schmerzen können, müssen aber nicht vorhanden sein. Standardisierte Ansätze, bei welchen Patientinnen eine Diagnose notwendig und sinnvoll ist fehlen ebenso wie prädiktive Marker, die dabei helfen, die jeweils beste Therapie zu planen. Die Validierung von Biomarkern und einer guten Annotierung mit klinischem follow-up könnte zur Verbesserung der Diagnostik und Behandlung führen.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

die_deep_infiltrating

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK