The search for a cause: women's experiences of pelvic pain prior to receiving a diagnosis of endometriosis

In: Zentralblatt für Gynäkologie · 2005 · vol. 127(05) · doi:10.1055/s-2005-920966 · W2663152875
article OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-30

A qualitative study of twenty-six women with endometriosis found that diagnostic delays, driven by symptom normalization and false-negative ultrasounds, significantly increased anxiety and disrupted social support networks.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-28 · read from full text

This qualitative study investigated the reasons for delayed endometriosis diagnosis and its impact on women’s experiences through semi-structured interviews with patients from a pelvic pain clinic. The analysis of twenty-six women revealed that most experienced significant diagnostic delays, often normalizing their symptoms or facing dismissal by general practitioners, which led to anxiety and social isolation. Key medical factors contributing to these delays included intermittent hormonal suppression masking symptoms and false-negative results from trans-vaginal ultrasounds. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically examining the patient experience and systemic barriers associated with diagnosing the condition.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Many women seek medical help for what is broadly defined as 'chronic pelvic pain', with a prevalence rate of 24% in Primary Care (1). A frequent cause of this pain is endometriosis, with a 10% prevalence rate in women of reproductive age (2). The diagnostic delay for this condition is reported to be between 6–9 years (3). Little is known, however, about why the diagnosis of this condition takes so long and how this affects women's experiences of the condition. Aims: To investigate the reasons for a delayed diagnosis of endometriosis and examine the impact of this on women's experiences. Method: A qualitative study, using semi-structured interviews. Thirty-two women were recruited from a pelvic pain clinic waiting list. Interviews were taped, transcribed and the data analysed using an interpretive approach. Six months following interview, follow-up data were obtained from hospital medical records to determine the final diagnosis. Twenty-six women were diagnosed as having endometriosis and were therefore included in the analysis. Results: The large majority of women (80%) reported a diagnostic delay of their pelvic pain, with just under half of the sample experiencing symptoms for over ten years before they were diagnosed with endometriosis. This lack of diagnosis not only generated anxiety about possible causes for symptoms, but for many women, it affected their self-image and often led to a breakdown in social support networks. The delayed diagnosis occurred at both an individual and a medical level. Individually, women tended to normalise their symptoms, perceiving themselves as 'unlucky'. At a medical level, women reported experiencing a delayed diagnosis for three key reasons; 1) normalisation of pain by the family doctor; 2) intermittent hormonal suppression of symptoms; and 3) false-negative investigations, particularly trans-vaginal ultrasound. Conclusions: Diagnostic delays in endometriosis occur at an individual and medical level, each having a potentially detrimental effect on women's experiences. Improved recognition of the symptoms of endometriosis, by women as well as family doctors, is likely to reduce the diagnostic delay, and in turn, decrease anxiety and breakdown of social support. The value of trans-vaginal ultrasound for the diagnosis of endometriosis needs to be examined further in order to reduce the negative impact of false-negative results on women's experiences of endometriosis.
Full text 3,318 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Background

Many women seek medical help for what is broadly defined as 'chronic pelvic pain', with a prevalence rate of 24% in Primary Care (1). A frequent cause of this pain is endometriosis, with a 10% prevalence rate in women of reproductive age (2). The diagnostic delay for this condition is reported to be between 6–9 years (3). Little is known, however, about why the diagnosis of this condition takes so long and how this affects women's experiences of the condition. Aims: To investigate the reasons for a delayed diagnosis of endometriosis and examine the impact of this on women's experiences. Method: A qualitative study, using semi-structured interviews. Thirty-two women were recruited from a pelvic pain clinic waiting list. Interviews were taped, transcribed and the data analysed using an interpretive approach. Six months following interview, follow-up data were obtained from hospital medical records to determine the final diagnosis. Twenty-six women were diagnosed as having endometriosis and were therefore included in the analysis. Results: The large majority of women (80%) reported a diagnostic delay of their pelvic pain, with just under half of the sample experiencing symptoms for over ten years before they were diagnosed with endometriosis. This lack of diagnosis not only generated anxiety about possible causes for symptoms, but for many women, it affected their self-image and often led to a breakdown in social support networks. The delayed diagnosis occurred at both an individual and a medical level. Individually, women tended to normalise their symptoms, perceiving themselves as 'unlucky'. At a medical level, women reported experiencing a delayed diagnosis for three key reasons; 1) normalisation of pain by the family doctor; 2) intermittent hormonal suppression of symptoms; and 3) false-negative investigations, particularly trans-vaginal ultrasound. Conclusions: Diagnostic delays in endometriosis occur at an individual and medical level, each having a potentially detrimental effect on women's experiences. Improved recognition of the symptoms of endometriosis, by women as well as family doctors, is likely to reduce the diagnostic delay, and in turn, decrease anxiety and breakdown of social support. The value of trans-vaginal ultrasound for the diagnosis of endometriosis needs to be examined further in order to reduce the negative impact of false-negative results on women's experiences of endometriosis.

References

1) Zondervan KT, Yudkin PL, Vessey MP, Jenkinson CP, Dawes MG, Barlow DH, Kennedy SH. The community prevalence of chronic pelvic pain in women and associated illness behaviour. British Journal Of General Practice 2001;51(468):541–7. 2) Vigano, P., Parazzini, F., Somigliana, E & Vercellini, P. (2004) Endometriosis: epidemiology and aetiological factors. Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 18;2:177–2003 3) Dmowski WP, Lesniewicz R, Rana N, Pepping P, Noursalehi M. Changing trends in the diagnosis of endometriosis: a comparative study of women with pelvic endometriosis presenting with chronic pelvic pain or infertility. Fertility Sterility. 1997 Feb;67(2):238–43.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK