Risk factors for bladder injuries during cesarean sections: insights from a 15 year experience at a tertiary care center and a systematic review with meta-analysis

meta-analysis OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13

This study identified older maternal age, prior cesarean sections, adhesions, emergent procedures, failed VBAC, second stage of labor, and macrosomia as risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean sections.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13 · read from full text

This paper assessed risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean section using a matched case–control study of 23 bladder injury cases among 15,260 cesarean deliveries from 2009–2024 at a tertiary center, combined with a systematic review and meta-analysis of case–control studies through 2024. Older maternal age and prior cesarean history were more common in cases, and the meta-analysis (4 included studies, analyzed with random-effects regression) found adhesions, repeated cesareans, emergent procedures, failed vaginal birth after cesarean, second stage of labor, and macrosomia as significant predictors. A key limitation is that the evidence base comprised observational case–control designs, which inherently restrict causal inference and may vary in how risk factors and injuries were defined across studies. Relevance to endometriosis: endometriosis is mentioned as having no significant difference between bladder injury cases and controls in the authors’ case–control analysis, though the paper’s main focus is cesarean-related bladder injury risk factors.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify potential risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean section (CS). METHODS: We conducted an observational case-control study from 2009 to 2024 at our Tertiary Care Hospital, matching each bladder injury case with four controls. Additionally, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed using MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus, from inception to 2024; eligible studies were case-control studies assessing risk factors for bladder injury during CS. Random-effects regression with the restricted maximum likelihood method was employed for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: We identified 23 cases of bladder injury out of 15,260 CSs at our hospital, resulting in a rate of 0.15%. Women with bladder injuries were significantly older (p = 0.022), with 47.8% having a history of previous CS, while no significant differences were observed between groups regarding prior abdominal surgery, endometriosis, or body mass index. The systematic review included four case-control studies, whose data were meta-analyzed with our patients, identifying several significant predictors: adhesions (OR 18.6, 95% CI 8.86-39.0), repeated CS (OR 3.25, 95% CI 2.02-5.23), emergent procedures (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.71-5.80), failed vaginal birth after cesarean (OR 4.74, 95% CI 2.18-10.3), second stage of labor (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.80-4.29), and macrosomia (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.25-5.57). CONCLUSIONS: Key risk factors for cesarean bladder injury include prior CSs, adhesions, second stage of labor, macrosomia, failed VBAC, and emergent procedures. Identifying these risk factors is critical for preoperative assessment and counseling, allowing for better surgical planning and improved outcomes.
Full text 9,992 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose To identify potential risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean section (CS).

Methods

We conducted an observational case–control study from 2009 to 2024 at our Tertiary Care Hospital, matching each bladder injury case with four controls. Additionally, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed using MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus, from inception to 2024; eligible studies were case–control studies assessing risk factors for bladder injury during CS. Random-effects regression with the restricted maximum likelihood method was employed for the meta-analysis.

Results

We identified 23 cases of bladder injury out of 15,260 CSs at our hospital, resulting in a rate of 0.15%. Women with bladder injuries were significantly older (p = 0.022), with 47.8% having a history of previous CS, while no significant differences were observed between groups regarding prior abdominal surgery, endometriosis, or body mass index. The systematic review included four case–control studies, whose data were meta-analyzed with our patients, identifying several significant predictors: adhesions (OR 18.6, 95% CI 8.86–39.0), repeated CS (OR 3.25, 95% CI 2.02–5.23), emergent procedures (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.71–5.80), failed vaginal birth after cesarean (OR 4.74, 95% CI 2.18–10.3), second stage of labor (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.80–4.29), and macrosomia (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.25–5.57).

Conclusions

Key risk factors for cesarean bladder injury include prior CSs, adhesions, second stage of labor, macrosomia, failed VBAC, and emergent procedures. Identifying these risk factors is critical for preoperative assessment and counseling, allowing for better surgical planning and improved outcomes. Similar content being viewed by others Data availability Data are available upon request.

References

DeLancey, J. Surgical Anatomy of the Female Pelvis; 2015. Cordon BH, Fracchia JA, Armenakas NA (2014) Iatrogenic nonendoscopic bladder injuries over 24 Years: 127 cases at a single institution. Urology 84(1):222–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.03.028 Rajasekar D, Hall M (1997) Urinary tract injuries during obstetric intervention. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104(6):731–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11986.x Kaskarelis D, Sakkas J, Aravantinos D, Michalas S, Zolotas J (1975) Urinary tract injuries in gynecological and obstetrical procedures. Int Surg 60(1):40–43 Phipps MG, Watabe B, Clemons JL, Weitzen S, Myers DL (2005) Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 105(1):156–160. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000149150.93552.78 Rahman MS, Gasem T, Al Suleiman SA, Al Jama FE, Burshaid S, Rahman J (2009) Bladder injuries during cesarean section in a university hospital: a 25-year review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 279(3):349–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0733-1 Tarney CM (2013) Bladder injury during cesarean delivery. Curr Womens Health Rev 9(2):70–76. https://doi.org/10.2174/157340480902140102151729 Jensen A-S, Rudnicki M (2023) Iatrogenic bladder and ureteral injuries following gynecological and obstetric surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 307(2):511–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06800-0 Duong TH, Patterson TM (2014) Lower urinary tract injuries during hysterectomy in women with a history of two or more cesarean deliveries: a secondary analysis. Int Urogynecology J 25(8):1037–1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2324-3 Gungorduk K, Asicioglu O, Celikkol O, Sudolmus S, Ark C (2010) Iatrogenic bladder injuries during caesarean delivery: a case control study. J Obstet Gynaecol J Inst Obstet Gynaecol 30(7):667–670. https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2010.486086 Oliphant SS, Bochenska K, Tolge ME, Catov JM, Zyczynski HM (2014) Maternal lower urinary tract injury at the time of cesarean delivery. Int Urogynecology J 25(12):1709–1714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2446-2 Franchi M, Raffaelli R, Baggio S, Scollo M, Garzon S, Laganà AS, Casarin J, Zanconato G, Cromi A, Ghezzi F (2019) Unintentional transvesical caesarean section: incidence, risk factors, surgical technique and post-operative management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 236:26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.02.023 Chill HH, Karavani G, Reuveni-Salzman A, Lipschuetz M, Shimonovitz T, Cohen N, Shveiky D (2021) Urinary bladder injury during cesarean delivery: risk factors and the role of retrograde bladder filling. Int Urogynecology J 32(7):1801–1806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04630-9 Stark M (2021) An evidence-based cesarean section suggested for universal use. J Perinat Med 49(7):806–808. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2021-0382 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) PRISMA Group. preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 Study Quality Assessment Tools | NHLBI, NIH. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools (accessed 2024–10–23). Freeman MF, Tukey JW (1950) Transformations related to the angular and the square root. Ann Math Stat 21(4):607–611. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729756 Berman NG, Parker RA (2002) Meta-analysis: neither quick nor easy. BMC Med Res Methodol 2:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-2-10 Alcocer Urueta J, Bonilla Mares M, Gorbea Chávez V, Velázquez Valassi B (2009) Risk factors for bladder injuries during cesarean section. Actas Urol Esp 33(7):806–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0210-4806(09)74234-2 Ibrahim N, Spence AR, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Abenhaim HA (2023) Incidence and risk factors of bladder injury during cesarean delivery: a cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 307(2):401–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06447-x Ma G, Yang Y, Fu Q (2024) The incidence, indications, risk factors and pregnancy outcomes of peripartum hysterectomy at a tertiary hospital between 2013 and 2022. Arch Gynecol Obstet 310(1):145–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07276-2 Smid MC, Vladutiu CJ, Dotters-Katz SK, Boggess KA, Manuck TA, Stamilio DM (2017) Maternal obesity and major intraoperative complications during cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 216(6):614.e1-614.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.011 Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, Peaceman AM, O’Sullivan MJ, Sibai B, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BM (2006) National institute of child health and human development maternal-fetal medicine units network maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84 Cahill AG, Stout MJ, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO, Peipert JF, Macones GA (2008) Risk factors for bladder injury in patients with a prior hysterotomy. Obstet Gynecol 112(1):116–120. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31817946f4 Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, Landon MB, Gilbert S, Spong CY, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, O’Sullivan MJ, Sibai BM, Langer O, Gabbe SG (2007) National institute of child health and human development (NICHD) maternal-fetal medicine units network (MFMU) comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000257121.56126.fe Funding The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions MV and LL screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, extracted data, performed the case–control study on our population, and prepared the first draft of the case–control results. SD and LP reviewed all titles and abstracts, screened full texts, scanned reference lists of included studies, extracted data from all studies, assessed study quality, performed the meta-analysis, and prepared the first draft of the manuscript. JL performed the statistical analysis of our case–control study and the meta-analysis, interpreted the results, and reviewed the drafts. EC conceived the study, provided methodological and content expertise, resolved conflicts, reviewed all drafts, and prepared the final manuscript. All authors reviewed the final version prior to submission. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Ethical approval Ethics approval was not required. The name of the ethics committee is “Comitato Etico Area Vasta Emilia Centro – AVEC, Policlinico Sant’Orsola”. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Supplementary Information Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Doroldi, S., Piemonti, L., Valeriani, M. et al. Risk factors for bladder injuries during cesarean sections: insights from a 15 year experience at a tertiary care center and a systematic review with meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 310, 2829–2838 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07826-2 Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07826-2

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Cesarean Section Cesarean Section Cesarean Section Cesarean Section Cesarean Section Cesarean Section Cesarean Section Cesarean Section Cesarean Section Cesarean Section Cesarean Section Cesarean Section Cesarean Section Cesarean Section Cesarean Section Cesarean Section Cesarean Section Cesarean Section Cesarean Section Cesarean Section

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

References (23)

Source provenance

crossref
last seen: 2026-05-18T01:00:05.020819+00:00
europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-01T06:12:12.862213+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-07-01T06:09:39.259062+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine