Association of birth and childhood weight with risk of chronic diseases and multimorbidity in adulthood.

This cohort study used UK Biobank data and followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline. The UK Biobank is a large population-based prospective study, recruiting more than half a million UK individuals aged 40–69 years between 2006 and 2010. At baseline, sociodemographic, lifestyles, and health-related information were collected via touchscreen questionnaires and physical measurements. Participants were followed for health-related outcomes through linkage to routinely available national datasets, including the Hospital Episode Statistics for England, the Patient Episode Database for Wales, and the Scottish Morbidity Record for Scotland. Appropriate informed consent was obtained from participants, and ethical approval was covered by the UK Biobank. More details of the UK Biobank study are available elsewhere 19 . This study included individuals who attended the baseline assessment of UK Biobank. The exclusion criteria were: (1) individuals with no information on birth weight, childhood body size, or adulthood body mass index (BMI); (2) individuals who were part of a multiple birth; and (3) individuals who were lost or died during follow-up (Supplementary Fig.  S1 ). The main exposures were birth weight and childhood body size at 10 years of each eligible participants, which were collected through self-reported questionnaires at baseline. Participants were asked to recall their birth weights and were categorized into three groups: LBW ( ≤ 2.5 kg), normal birth weight (NBW, 2.5–4.0 kg), and HBW (≥4.0 kg) 20 , 21 . Childhood body size was self-reported according to the question: “When you were 10 years old, compared to average would you describe yourself as…?”, with the answer of being thinner, average, or plumper. Furthermore, we assessed the weight change from birth to childhood and classified weight change into 9 groups. Based on previous literature, including the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QoF, with the common conditions in the UK) 22 , a large UK-based study 23 , a systematic review on multimorbidity indices 24 , and other evidence from UK Biobank on multimorbidity 23 , a total of 38 physical and mental chronic conditions were included in our study to define multimorbidity (Supplementary Table  S1 ). Information of aforementioned conditions was extracted through the linkage to inpatient hospital data, according to the codes of International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10). The onset time of each condition was recorded as the date of inpatient diagnosis. Multimorbidity was defined as the coexistence of two or more of these 38 chronic conditions. Covariates including sociodemographic characteristics (age, sex, ethnicity, Townsend deprivation index, and education levels), anthropometric information (BMI at baseline), lifestyle factors (current smoking and drinking status, physical activity, and intake of fruits and vegetables), and early life factors (maternal smoking status around birth and breastfeed status as a baby) were collected at baseline. Participants with missing data for covariates were assigned to a separate group of ‘unknown’. Townsend deprivation index was divided into tertiles (low, moderate, and high). Adulthood BMI was categorized into 4 groups of underweight (<20.0 kg/m 2 ), normal weight (20.0–24.9 kg/m 2 ), overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m 2 ), and obesity (≥30.0 kg/m 2 ) 25 . Physical activity was evaluated via Metabolic Equivalent Task (MET) minutes per week for moderate and vigorous activity and was further categorized into tertiles (low, moderate, and high). For the intake of fruits and vegetables, participants were categorized into four groups respectively, according to previous studies 26 – 28 : ‘<2.0 servings/day’, ‘2.0–2.9 servings/day’, ‘3.0–3.9 servings/day’, and ‘≥4.0 servings/day’. Exploratory factor analysis was performed with the principal factor method to identify multimorbidity patterns. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin statistic, estimated to analyze the adequacy of the sample, was 0.74. The breakpoint of the screen plot, the eigenvalue (>1), and interpretability were used to determine multimorbidity patterns. We performed a varimax rotation of factor-loading matrices, with the resulting factor loadings representing the strength of the association between each chronic condition and the latent pattern. Chronic conditions with a factor loading > 0.35 referred to the characteristics of the multimorbidity pattern. Factor scores of all participants were calculated to indicate adherence to each multimorbidity pattern, as higher scores represented higher adherence. They were then divided into the percentage of 0–85%, 85–90%, 90–95%, and 95–100% to indicate adherence to each multimorbidity pattern for further analysis. Basic characteristics were described as mean (standard deviation [SD]) for continuous variables and as number (percentage) for categorical variables. The differences of variables across groups by birth weight and childhood body size were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and χ 2 test. In the primary analyses, Cox regression models were utilized to estimate the associations of birth weight and childhood body size with each chronic condition and multimorbidity. Years from birth to the onset of multimorbidity or each chronic condition, or 31 December 2020, whichever came first, were considered the time scale. The proportional hazard assumption was checked and verified using Schoenfeld’s residual methods, where no violations were found. Four models were conducted to sequentially adjust covariates, including sociodemographic characteristics and anthropometric information, lifestyle factors, and early life factors. The restricted cubic spline (RCS) model was utilized to display the dose-response association of birth weight with multimorbidity and each chronic condition. Also, the cumulative incidence function (CIF) curves were used to compare the cumulative incidence of adulthood multimorbidity across different groups of birth weight and childhood body size. Moreover, associations of weight change with the incidence of each chronic condition and multimorbidity were assessed in each birth weight group using Cox proportional hazard models, with changes to average body size as reference groups. Besides, quasi-Poisson mixed effects models were used to evaluate the associations of birth weight, childhood body size, and weight change with the number of chronic conditions during follow-up. A series of exploratory analyses, sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were conducted to test the robustness of our results. First, multinomial logistic regression models were used to explore the association of birth weight and childhood body size with different multimorbidity patterns. Second, we recategorized birth weight into four groups: ≤2.5 kg, 2.5-4.0 kg, 4.0-4.5 kg, and >4.5 kg 29 , 30 , to explore the association of highest birth weight (>4.5 kg) with the risk of multimorbidity. Third, we repeated the primary analyses by: (1) excluding participants with missing data of covariates; (2) imputing missing data of covariates using multiple imputation for five times; and (3) including family history (mother/father/sibling) of several major diseases in the fully adjusted model: heart disease, stroke, cancer, chronic bronchitis/emphysema, high blood pressure, diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease/dementia, Parkinson’s disease, and severe depression (Supplementary Table  S2 ). Fourth, subgroup analyses were performed stratified by age at baseline, sex, Townsend deprivation index, education level, and family history of major diseases. Potential effect modifications were evaluated by adding an interaction term of each variable and birth weight or childhood body size in the model. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS (version 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., NC, USA) and R (version 4.1.2, R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs), relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were reported in this study. Significance tests were evaluated at the 0.05 level using two-sided tests. The UK Biobank has ethical approval from the NHS National Research Ethics Service (16/NW/0274). This is a secondary analysis of UK Biobank which is exempted from Institutional Review Board. Further information on research design is available in the  Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Among the 502,490 participants attending baseline assessment of UK Biobank, a total of 246,495 participants remained in the current study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The basic characteristics of excluded and included participants were summarized in Supplementary Table  S3 . Among the 246,495 participants (Supplementary Data  1 ), the mean baseline age was 55.2 (SD = 8.1) years, and 150,486 (61.1%) participants were female. The proportion of participants who reported their birth weight was 77.2% (NBW), 8.8% (LBW), and 14.0% (HBW), respectively. A total of 51.0% of participants reported an average childhood body size at 10 years, whereas 32.3% reported being slimmer and 16.6% reported being plumper. The characteristics of participants according to birth weight and body size at 10 years were also shown in Supplementary Data  1 . A total of 57,071 (23.2%) participants developed multimorbidity. The characteristics of participants by multimorbidity status were presented in Supplementary Data  2 . Participants with multimorbidity were more likely to have abnormal birth weight (LBW or HBW) and childhood body size (thinner or plumper), higher BMI at baseline, and be physically inactive than those free of multimorbidity. Participants with LBW/HBW and thinner/plumper childhood body size had a higher cumulative incidence of multimorbidity (Fig.  1 ). LBW (adjusted HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.26–1.33), HBW (adjusted HR = 1.02, 95% CI = > 1.00–1.05), thinner body size (adjusted HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.18–1.23), and plumper body size (adjusted HR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.04–1.09) were all associated with a higher risk of developing multimorbidity (Table  1 ). The RCS model showed a U-shaped relationship between birth weight and multimorbidity ( P for nonlinear <0.001, Fig.  2 ), with a lower risk at a birth weight of 3.33–4.09 kg. As shown in Table  2 , low birth weight, high birth weight, thinner body size, and plumper body size were associated with increased number of chronic diseases. Fig. 1 Cumulative incidence of multimorbidity according to birth weight and childhood body size. For the curve of birth weight, the red, blue and green lines represent low birth weight, high birth weight, and normal birth weight, respectively. For the curve of childhood body size, the red, blue, and green lines represent thinner, plumper, and average body size, respectively. Table 1 Associations of birth weight and childhood body size with multimorbidity. Categories of birth weight, childhood body size, and weight change Birth weight Low birth weight Normal birth weight High birth weight n (%) 21,626 (8.8) 190,359 (77.2) 34,510 (14.0) Model 1 1.32 (1.28–1.35) Reference 1.05 (1.02–1.07) Model 2 1.29 (1.26–1.33) Reference 1.02 (>1.00–1.05) Model 3 1.29 (1.26–1.33) Reference 1.02 (>1.00–1.04) Model 4 1.29 (1.26–1.33) Reference 1.02 (>1.00–1.05) Childhood body size Thinner body size Average body size Plumper body size n (%) 79,700 (32.3) 125,803 (51.0) 40,992 (16.6) Model 1 1.22 (1.20–1.24) Reference 1.05 (1.02–1.07) Model 2 1.21 (1.18–1.23) Reference 1.06 (1.04–1.09) Model 3 1.21 (1.18–1.23) Reference 1.06 (1.04–1.09) Model 4 1.21 (1.18–1.23) Reference 1.06 (1.04–1.09) Groups of weight change Low birth weight→Thinner Low birth weight→Average Low birth weight→Plumper n (%) 9,340 (43.2) 8,950 (41.4) 3,336 (15.4) Model 1 1.24 (1.17–1.31) Reference 1.13 (1.06–1.22) Model 2 1.21 (1.15–1.28) Reference 1.13 (1.05–1.21) Model 3 1.21 (1.15–1.28) Reference 1.13 (1.05–1.21) Model 4 1.21 (1.15–1.28) Reference 1.13 (1.05–1.22) Normal birth weight→Thinner Normal birth weight→Average Normal birth weight→Plumper n (%) 98,293 (51.6) 61,740 (32.4) 30,326 (15.9) Model 1 1.22 (1.19–1.24) Reference 1.03 (1.00–1.06) Model 2 1.20 (1.18–1.23) Reference 1.05 (1.02–1.08) Model 3 1.20 (1.18–1.23) Reference 1.05 (1.02–1.07) Model 4 1.20 (1.18–1.23) Reference 1.05 (1.02–1.07) High birth weight→Thinner High birth weight→Average High birth weight→Plumper n (%) 18,170 (52.7) 9,010 (26.1) 7,330 (21.2) Model 1 1.24 (1.18–1.30) Reference 1.08 (1.02–1.14) Model 2 1.21 (1.15–1.27) Reference 1.08 (1.03–1.14) Model 3 1.21 (1.15–1.27) Reference 1.08 (1.03–1.14) Model 4 1.21 (1.15–1.27) Reference 1.08 (1.03–1.14) Model 1: unadjusted. Model 2: adjusted for age at baseline, sex, ethnicity, Townsend deprivation index, education levels, and BMI at baseline. Model 3: model 2 also adjusted for current smoking and drinking status, physical activity, intake of fruits and vegetables. Model 4: model 3 also adjusted for maternal smoking around birth and breastfed as a baby. We adjusted for the other variable in each of the birth weight and childhood obesity status model. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals are shown in the table. Fig. 2 Restricted cubic spline models for the relationship of birth weight with and multimorbidity. Adjusted for age at baseline, sex, ethnicity, Townsend deprivation index, education level, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, intake of fruits and vegetables, body mass index categories at baseline, maternal smoking around birth and breastfed as a baby. The solid line represents hazard ratios, and the shading represents 95% confidence interval. Table 2 Association of birth weight, childhood body size, and weight change with the number of chronic conditions. Categories of birth weight, childhood body size, and weight change n (%) RR (95% CI) Birth weight Low birth weight 21,626 (8.8) 1.27 (1.25–1.29) Normal birth weight 190,359 (77.2) Reference High birth weight 34,510 (14.0) 1.05 (1.03–1.06) Childhood body size Thinner body size 79,700 (32.3) 1.18 (1.16–1.19) Average body size 125,803 (51.0) Reference Plumper body size 40,992 (16.6) 1.02 (1.01–1.03) Groups of weight change Low birth weight→Thinner 9340 (43.2) 1.18 (1.13–1.22) Low birth weight→Average 8950 (41.4) Reference Low birth weight→Plumper 3336 (15.4) 1.09 (1.03–1.14) Normal birth weight→Thinner 98,293 (51.6) 1.17 (1.15–1.19) Normal birth weight→Average 61,740 (32.4) Reference Normal birth weight→Plumper 30,326 (15.9) 1.01 (0.99–1.02) High birth weight→Thinner 18,170 (52.7) 1.20 (1.16–1.24) High birth weight→Average 9010 (26.1) Reference High birth weight→Plumper 7330 (21.2) 1.04 (1.01–1.08) Adjusted for age at baseline, sex, ethnicity, Townsend deprivation index, education level, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, intake of fruits and vegetables, BMI categories at baseline, maternal smoking around birth and breastfed as a baby. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals are shown in the table. For the curve of birth weight, the red, blue and green lines represent low birth weight, high birth weight, and normal birth weight, respectively. For the curve of childhood body size, the red, blue, and green lines represent thinner, plumper, and average body size, respectively. Associations of birth weight and childhood body size with multimorbidity. Model 1: unadjusted. Model 2: adjusted for age at baseline, sex, ethnicity, Townsend deprivation index, education levels, and BMI at baseline. Model 3: model 2 also adjusted for current smoking and drinking status, physical activity, intake of fruits and vegetables. Model 4: model 3 also adjusted for maternal smoking around birth and breastfed as a baby. We adjusted for the other variable in each of the birth weight and childhood obesity status model. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals are shown in the table. Adjusted for age at baseline, sex, ethnicity, Townsend deprivation index, education level, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, intake of fruits and vegetables, body mass index categories at baseline, maternal smoking around birth and breastfed as a baby. The solid line represents hazard ratios, and the shading represents 95% confidence interval. Association of birth weight, childhood body size, and weight change with the number of chronic conditions. Adjusted for age at baseline, sex, ethnicity, Townsend deprivation index, education level, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, intake of fruits and vegetables, BMI categories at baseline, maternal smoking around birth and breastfed as a baby. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals are shown in the table. Associations of birth weight and childhood body size with late-life individual chronic conditions were shown in Fig.  3 . LBW and thinner body size was associated with higher risk of many chronic conditions. However, the results for HBW and plumper body size diverged. The U-shape relationship was also observed for birth weight with most of the 38 conditions (Supplementary Fig.  S2 – 4 ). Fig. 3 Estimated hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the association of birth weight and childhood body size with incident individual conditions. Reference groups: normal birth weight and average body size in childhood. Adjusted for age at baseline, sex, ethnicity, Townsend deprivation index, education level, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, intake of fruits and vegetables, body mass index categories at baseline, maternal smoking around birth and breastfed as a baby. Diseases with hazard ratios>1 and P  < 0.05 were marked in red, those with hazard ratios<1 and P  < 0.05 were marked in blue. Reference groups: normal birth weight and average body size in childhood. Adjusted for age at baseline, sex, ethnicity, Townsend deprivation index, education level, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, intake of fruits and vegetables, body mass index categories at baseline, maternal smoking around birth and breastfed as a baby. Diseases with hazard ratios>1 and P  < 0.05 were marked in red, those with hazard ratios<1 and P  < 0.05 were marked in blue. Among participants with LBW, 43.2% kept being thinner at 10 years, and 15.4% became plumper. More than half of participants (51.6%) with NBW changed to be thinner at their 10 years. For participants with HBW, 26.1% of them were of average body size at 10 years, and 52.7% of them turned out to be thinner (Table  1 ). Changing to be thinner or plumper, no matter from which birth weight group, was observed to associate with higher risk of multimorbidity and increased number of chronic conditions, compared to changing to be average. The higher HRs occurred in changing to thinner body size (HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.15–1.28 for LBW to thinner body size; HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.18–1.23 for NBW to thinner body size; HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.15–1.27 for HBW to thinner body size). Also, changing to thinner or plumper body sizes were all associated with increased number of chronic conditions (Table  2 ). The associations of weight change from birth to childhood with the risks of each chronic condition were showed in Fig.  4 . For those with NBW, changing to be thinner at 10 years increased the risks of 28 conditions, whereas changing to be plumper was associated with higher risks of 12 conditions and lower risks of two conditions, respectively. Fig. 4 Association of weight change from birth to childhood with individual conditions. Reference groups: changing to average childhood body size. Adjusted for age at baseline, sex, ethnicity, Townsend deprivation index, education level, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, intake of fruits and vegetables, body mass index categories at baseline, maternal smoking around birth and breastfed as a baby. Diseases with hazard ratios>1 and P  < 0.05 were marked in red, those with hazard ratios <1 and P  < 0.05 were marked in blue. Reference groups: changing to average childhood body size. Adjusted for age at baseline, sex, ethnicity, Townsend deprivation index, education level, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, intake of fruits and vegetables, body mass index categories at baseline, maternal smoking around birth and breastfed as a baby. Diseases with hazard ratios>1 and P  < 0.05 were marked in red, those with hazard ratios <1 and P  < 0.05 were marked in blue. According to factor analysis, we identified six patterns of multimorbidity (Supplementary Table  S4 ). The associations of LBW and thinner body size with multimorbidity patterns were consistently observed, while plumper body size was associated with a lower risk of Cardiovascular Pattern (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89-0.99) (Supplementary Table  S5 ). After recategorization of high birth weight, participants with the highest birth weight (>4.5 kg) had a higher risk of multimorbidity (adjusted HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.06–1.14), while that for participants with birth weight of 4.0-4.5 kg was not significant (Supplementary Table  S6 ). Similar results were revealed after excluding or imputing the missing data of covariates (Supplementary Table  S7 - 8 ). When additionally adjusting family history of several major disease in the model, similar results were found (Supplementary Table  S9 ). The subgroup analyses showed similar results to our main findings (Supplementary Fig.  S5 ). Moreover, the associations of birth weight and childhood body size with multimorbidity were consistent among participants with or without family history of most major diseases (Supplementary Fig.  S6 ).

In this large prospective cohort study of 246,495 participants, we found that birth weight and childhood body size were significantly associated with multimorbidity and many chronic conditions in late life. A U-shape relationship was observed between birth weight and multimorbidity and most chronic conditions. Individuals who changed to be thinner or plumper in childhood, no matter from which birth weight group, had increased risks of developing multimorbidity and many chronic conditions than those who changed to the average body size. Previous cohort studies have explored the association between early life body size and several individual chronic conditions, mainly focusing on cardiometabolic diseases and cancers. Most of these studies have shown significant associations of birth weight and childhood body size with chronic conditions. For example, existing evidence has presented positive associations of LBW with higher risks of diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) 3 , 31 – 33 , and HBW with increased risks of obesity and schizophrenia 34 , 35 . Ahlgren et al. also found a positive linear relationship between birth weight and many types of cancers 36 . For body size in childhood, a higher BMI was observed to increase the risk of diabetes 37 , 38 . A systematic review and meta-analysis of 37 longitudinal studies also found that higher childhood BMI could increase the risk of diabetes, coronary heart disease and cancers, but not stroke or breast cancer 7 . Although the prevalence of multimorbidity has been increasing rapidly in recent decades, particularly among the aging population, whether it could be predicted by early life factors has not been well documented. Our study extends previous findings to a broader spectrum of physical and mental conditions to measure multimorbidity in a large study sample with long-term monitoring of health-related outcomes, showing associations of LBW, HBW, thinner and plumper body size with higher risks of 27, 11, 27, and 13 of the 38 chronic conditions respectively. Birth weight was an indicator of fetal health 2 , 39 , and our results confirmed its association with multimorbidity and many chronic conditions in late life, especially LBW. In addition, the consideration of childhood body size further expanded the exploration of early life risk factors to a 10-year range. Our findings can support the “fetal origins” and DOHaD hypotheses that the disproportionate growth in early life, in utero in particular, would determine the development of many chronic diseases in late life 40 , with substantial implications for individuals, families, societies, and the global healthcare systems. It is worth noting that individuals with HBW were found to experience lower risks of asthma, diabetes, hypertension, and endometriosis, according to our results. The RCS models found the U-shape dose-response relationships between birth weight and three of these conditions (asthma, diabetes, and hypertension), and the lower HRs occurred in higher birth weight (>4.0 kg) than those for other conditions, which might explain the inverse association of HBW with these three conditions. We further conducted a sensitivity analysis by recategorizing HBW into 4.0–4.5 kg and >4.5 kg groups and found the significant association with multimorbidity disappeared in the 4.0–4.5 kg group, while that for the highest birth weight (>4.5 kg) group remained. These results suggested that highest birth weight may be a better indicator of multimorbidity and several diseases, which might also partially explain the inconsistency with previous evidence (e.g., a previous study suggested the higher risk of diabetes in those with HBW 41 ). Besides, the negative linear relationship between birth weight and endometriosis has not been reported previously, calling for further clarification of such an association. In addition, the inverse association of plumper body size at 10 years with cancer, myocardial infarction, and prostate problems were observed in our study. Also, the inverse association of plumper body size with myocardial infarction might contribute to the inverse association between plumper body size and Cardiovascular Pattern. Consistent with our findings, the association of plumper body size in childhood could diverge with different subtype cancers, according to a previous study 42 . These discrepancies could partly be explained by the “growth acceleration” hypothesis that the catch-up growth for individuals with LBW or thinner childhood body size would result in relatively higher postnatal or pubertal growth and consequently lead to a higher risk of several conditions than those with HBW or plumper body size 43 . However, due to the lack of continuous data on childhood body size, we could not find the cut-off of childhood BMI on multimorbidity and chronic conditions. Further large population-based studies are warranted to validate the role of HBW and plumper body size in childhood on the observed associations. A previous study of UK Biobank observed a significant interaction between birth weight and adult BMI 3 , indicating that the longitudinal weight change might relate to long-term health status. Therefore, we further investigated the life-course association of weight change from birth to childhood with multimorbidity and chronic conditions. We found the association of changing to be thinner or plumper with multimorbidity was robust, regardless of individuals’ birth weight. In line with our findings, a systematic review reported that individuals changing from normal weight to high weight in adulthood would experience higher CVD risk factors and outcomes 44 , supporting that unfavorable weight change may adversely impact subsequent health-related outcomes. However, no previous study has well explored the effect of weight change from birth to childhood. As a proxy indicator of early life growth, more attention should be paid to exploring the association of weight change from birth to childhood and its trajectories with the development of multimorbidity and chronic conditions. When considering family history of several chronic diseases in the model, the associations of birth weight and childhood body size with multimorbidity were similar to the main results. Also, such association was consistent among participants with or without family history of most diseases, implying that the association of birth weight and childhood body size with multimorbidity may be independent of familial genetic factors. According to a Mendelian randomization study which provided evidence of genetic pleiotropy between birth weight and cardiometabolic risk factors, maternal intrauterine environment, in which maternal genetic variation influences offspring birth weight, was not the major predictor of offspring cardiometabolic outcomes, but birth weight determined by the individuals’ own genetic factors was more likely to associate with cardiometabolic outcomes 45 . This study, coupled with our results, provided converging evidence that familial genetic effects that predispose to offspring birth weight, were not the main determinant of some chronic diseases and multimorbidity in an individual’s later life. Future studies using genetic data are warranted to verify such points. The main strengths of this study include the large sample size, the long-term follow-up, the measurement of weight change, and the consideration of wide-range chronic conditions to measure multimorbidity using longitudinal data from UK Biobank. Limitations to this study also warrant consideration. First, the information on birth weight and childhood body size was self-reported by individuals, which was vulnerable to recall bias. Also, the childhood body size had no clear definition and was subjectively judged by individuals themselves, leading to the possibility of misclassification. Second, nearly half of participants recruited at baseline were excluded in our study, whose characteristics differed from the included, limiting the generalizability of our results. Third, the information on chronic conditions was linked to inpatient hospital data, missing out on the mild or undiagnosed forms of conditions, like depression and migraine. Fourth, the association of interest covered a large time span from birth to late-life, despite the inclusion of multiple covariates in our study, the potential for residual confounding of other factors could not been excluded. Fifth, although gestational age is an important factor affecting birth weight, we are not available to this data in UK Biobank. Last, we used family history of several major chronic disease as a proxy for genetic factors, future research utilizing genetic data are warranted to explore the interaction between genetic factors with birth weight and childhood body size in predicting multimorbidity. In conclusion, birth weight, childhood body size and their changes are associated with higher risks of developing multimorbidity and many chronic diseases in late life. Early monitoring and interventions to keep a normal body size in childhood could have life-course benefits for preventing multimorbidity above and beyond individual chronic conditions.

The World Health Organization has endorsed a global target of a 30% reduction in low birth weight and no increase in the proportion of overweight children by 2025 1 . Birth weight is an indicator of infant intrauterine development and health 2 , and current studies have also associated it with incidences of chronic diseases in adulthood or later life. A cohort study using data from 256,787 participants of UK Biobank observed that participants with LBW had higher risks of coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure in their later life 3 . Another study of 15,792 individuals aged 45–64 years in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study found that high birth weight (HBW) was related to an increased risk of heart failure 4 . Childhood body size was also reported to associate with a series of chronic conditions, including obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, depression, and cancer 5 – 10 . However, evidence on whether and to what extent abnormal birth weight and childhood body size are associated with life-course risks of multiple chronic conditions, which is defined as multimorbidity 11 , remains scanty. Most previous studies mainly focused on a single measurement of birth weight or body size at a specific childhood phase, failing to assess the dynamic weight changes over time. An observational study combined five birth cohorts measured the weight gain in three age periods (0–2 years, 2 years to mid-childhood, and mid-childhood to adulthood) and found faster weight gain was associated with an increased risk of overweight and high blood pressure in adulthood 12 . Another cohort study reported an association between weight gain from birth to age 2 years and lung function in late life 13 . These findings endorsed the notion that childhood developmental differences are evident in the first few years after birth, and worsen during early childhood, resulting in continuous influence on health throughout life 14 . However, most current studies commonly measured weight gain or weight growth, ignoring the influence of shifting from a normal or plumper body size to a thinner body size. As an indicator of undernutrition or developmental delays, children with thinner body sizes were more likely to develop chronic conditions related to nutrition in later life 15 . Understanding the long-term consequences of different changing patterns of body size in early childhood is important for life-course monitoring and intervention of body weight and weight-related chronic diseases. As birth weight and childhood body size are manageable 16 – 18 , elucidating their life-course association with multimorbidity and chronic conditions would have implications for preventing health-related outcomes around the whole life-course. Leveraging data from 246,495 individuals from UK Biobank, our study aims to investigate the association of birth weight, childhood body size at 10 years, and their longitudinal changes with the late-life risk of 38 types of chronic conditions and multimorbidity. In our study, birth weight and childhood body size were associated with multimorbidity and many chronic conditions in later life. Individuals who changed body shape during childhood to be either thinner or plumper, no matter from which birth weight group, were more likely to develop more than one chronic disease later in life.

Peer Review File Supplementary information Description of Additional Supplementary Data Supplementary Data 1 Supplementary Data 2 Supplementary Data 3 Reporting Summary Peer Review File Supplementary information Description of Additional Supplementary Data Supplementary Data 1 Supplementary Data 2 Supplementary Data 3 Reporting Summary