Vaginal hysterectomy

In: Medical Management of the Surgical Patient · 2013 · pp. 654–656 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511920660.102 · W1898806662
book-chapter OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-30

Historical teaching listed uterine enlargement, narrow vagina, diminished bituberous diameter, nulliparity, high uterus, and intra-abdominal conditions as contraindications for vaginal hysterectomy, though uterine size was unquantified.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03 · read from full text

This chapter discusses the history and evidence base for vaginal hysterectomy, including how late-19th/early-20th century “contraindications” (such as enlarged uterus, narrow vagina, reduced bituberous diameter, nulliparity, and the presence of endometriosis, adhesions, prior pelvic surgery, prior cesarean, or chronic pelvic pain) were described without consistent uterine-size quantification. It reviews later re-evaluation of hysterectomy complications, highlighting the CDC’s CREST data showing that for indications feasible by either route, abdominal hysterectomy had a complication rate twice that of the vaginal approach. A limitation is that the text is a narrative chapter relying on included studies and historical teaching rather than presenting new, quantified analyses. Relevance to endometriosis: endometriosis is listed among “intra-abdominal conditions” historically considered a contraindication to vaginal hysterectomy, though the chapter’s main focus is perioperative route selection and complication evidence for hysterectomy approaches, not endometriosis mechanisms or outcomes.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

In the late nineteenth and early twentieth century it was taught that vaginal hysterectomy could not be performed if the uterus was enlarged, but uterine size was never quantified. Other suggested contraindications included a ‘narrow vagina’ (pubic arch < 90°) and a diminished bituberous diameter (< 8.0 cm). The bituberous diameter represents the distance between the ischial tuberosities (or sitting bones) which are easily palpated when the patient is in the dorsal lithotomy position. Nulliparity and “a uterus that was too high or did not come down” were also considered as contraindications to the vaginal approach, as were “intra-abdominal conditions” such as endometriosis, adhesions, previous pelvic surgery, previous cesarean section, and chronic pelvic pain.
Full text 5,106 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Medical Management of the Surgical Patient Buy print or eBook [Opens in a new window] A Textbook of Perioperative Medicine from Section 21 - Gynecologic Surgery Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2013 In the late nineteenth and early twentieth century it was taught that vaginal hysterectomy could not be performed if the uterus was enlarged, but uterine size was never quantified. Other suggested contraindications included a ‘narrow vagina’ (pubic arch < 90°) and a diminished bituberous diameter (< 8.0 cm). The bituberous diameter represents the distance between the ischial tuberosities (or sitting bones) which are easily palpated when the patient is in the dorsal lithotomy position. Nulliparity and “a uterus that was too high or did not come down” were also considered as contraindications to the vaginal approach, as were “intra-abdominal conditions” such as endometriosis, adhesions, previous pelvic surgery, previous cesarean section, and chronic pelvic pain. Hysterectomy became the second most common operation performed in the USA in the middle twentieth century, but the complications related to this operation were not re-evaluated until 1982. The Collaborative Review of Sterilization (CREST) from the CDC studied the complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. For operative indications that could have been performed by either route, abdominal hysterectomy had a complication rate twice that of the vaginal approach. - Type - Chapter - Information - Medical Management of the Surgical PatientA Textbook of Perioperative Medicine, pp. 654 - 656Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013 Vaginal length and incidence of dyspareunia after total abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 151: 190–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Committee Opinion No. 444: Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. FINHYST, a prospective study of 5279 hysterectomies: complications and their risk factors. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 1741–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed , , et al. When do we need to perform laparotomy for benign uterine disease? Factors involved with conversion in vaginal hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2012; 38; 31–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed , , , Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 144: 841–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed , , et al. Abdominal, vaginal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy: perioperative morbidity. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 284: 385–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed , , et al. Minimally invasive hysterectomies – a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010; 17: 167–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed , , et al. The availability of vaginal hysterectomy in benign gynecologic diseases: a prospective, non-randomized trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2010; 36: 832–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed , , , Guidelines for the selection the route of hysterectomy: application in a resident clinic population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 1521–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar , , , , Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg 1990; 6: 185–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed , , Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; 8: CD003677.Google Scholar , , et al. Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future. To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle. Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply. Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service. - Vaginal hysterectomy - - Book: Medical Management of the Surgical Patient - Online publication: 05 September 2013 To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox. - Vaginal hysterectomy - - Book: Medical Management of the Surgical Patient - Online publication: 05 September 2013 To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive. - Vaginal hysterectomy - - Book: Medical Management of the Surgical Patient - Online publication: 05 September 2013

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

References (12)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK