Health Status Function after Treatment with Thermal Balloon Endometrial Ablation and Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System for Idiopathic Menorrhagia: A Randomized Study

In: Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation · 2006 · vol. 62(2) , pp. 84–88 · doi:10.1159/000092660 · PMID:16612101 · W2112591684
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 7 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

Thermal balloon endometrial ablation resulted in higher hemoglobin levels and better general health and mental health scores at one year compared to the levonorgestrel intrauterine system for idiopathic menorrhagia.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

AIM: To compare patients' health status function after treatment with thermal balloon endometrial ablation (TBEA) and levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) for idiopathic menorrhagia. METHODS: Forty-four patients were recruited into a randomized trial comparing their health status after treatment with TBEA or LNG-IUS for idiopathic menorrhagia. RESULTS: At 1 year follow-up, the mean haemoglobin was significantly higher in women treated with TBEA (12.6 g/dl vs. 10.3 g/dl, p = 0.018). Iron deficiency occurred in 13.3% from the TBEA arm and in 50% from the LNG-IUS arm (p = 0.026). The women's mean Short Form 36 Questionnaire general health perception scores (54.9 vs. 40.5, p = 0.024) and mental health scores (49.5 vs. 38.3, p = 0.021) in TBEA arm were significantly higher than in the LNG-IUS arm. The mental health domain score was also significantly lower in the LNG-IUS arm (46.1 vs. 38.3, p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: TBEA appears to offer better health status function at 1 year follow-up and to be more acceptable to our Chinese population in the treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia following failed medical treatment.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (17)

Cited by (7)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:03:29.626429+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK