Neural field patient-specific super resolution for enhanced 1.5 Tesla brain MRI visualization

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Brain magnetic resonance imaging serves as a cornerstone of preoperative neurosurgical assessment. Neural fields represent an emerging machine learning approach capable of super-resolution reconstruction and novel view synthesis without requiring large training datasets. We evaluated ten 1.5-Tesla brain MRI sequences (nine anisotropic and one isotropic) to train patient-specific neural field models using a proprietary framework (Radscaler©). Image quality assessment was performed on reconstructions upscaled by factors of 2×, 3×, and 4× relative to original resolution. The method achieved favorable quality metrics across all scaling factors: mean SSIM of 0.85 (±0.04), MS-SSIM of 0.95 (±0.01), and LPIPS of 0.09 (±0.04). Neural field reconstruction enabled enhanced visualization of micro-anatomical structures through improved spatial resolution and interpolation of intermediate views not present in the original acquisition. These findings demonstrate that neural fields provide a clinically viable approach for volumetric MRI super-resolution and novel view synthesis, particularly valuable for addressing anisotropic acquisition limitations in neurosurgical planning.
Full text 1,266 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Brain magnetic resonance imaging serves as a cornerstone of preoperative neurosurgical assessment. Neural fields represent an emerging machine learning approach capable of super-resolution reconstruction and novel view synthesis without requiring large training datasets. We evaluated ten 1.5-Tesla brain MRI sequences (nine anisotropic and one isotropic) to train patient-specific neural field models using a proprietary framework (Radscaler©). Image quality assessment was performed on reconstructions upscaled by factors of 2×, 3×, and 4× relative to original resolution. The method achieved favorable quality metrics across all scaling factors: mean SSIM of 0.85 (±0.04), MS-SSIM of 0.95 (±0.01), and LPIPS of 0.09 (±0.04). Neural field reconstruction enabled enhanced visualization of micro-anatomical structures through improved spatial resolution and interpolation of intermediate views not present in the original acquisition. These findings demonstrate that neural fields provide a clinically viable approach for volumetric MRI super-resolution and novel view synthesis, particularly valuable for addressing anisotropic acquisition limitations in neurosurgical planning. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00