Full text
29,410 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Ostial side branch stenosis in non-stenotic coronary segments: a characteristic finding in diabetes mellitus | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Ostial side branch stenosis in non-stenotic coronary segments: a characteristic finding in diabetes mellitus View ORCID Profile Yasushi Yamanaka , Yoshiharu Fujimori , Satoshi Hashimoto , Kazuto Kurihara , Tomoko Sasaki , Masayuki Yoshimura , Miki Takahashi , Tadamasa Wakabayashi , Taku Imai doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.18.24315629 Yasushi Yamanaka 1 The Department of Cardiology, Suwa Central Hospital , Chino, Nagano, Japan MD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Yasushi Yamanaka For correspondence: yasushiyamanaka1112{at}gmail.com Yoshiharu Fujimori 1 The Department of Cardiology, Suwa Central Hospital , Chino, Nagano, Japan MD, PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Satoshi Hashimoto 1 The Department of Cardiology, Suwa Central Hospital , Chino, Nagano, Japan MD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Kazuto Kurihara 1 The Department of Cardiology, Suwa Central Hospital , Chino, Nagano, Japan MD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Tomoko Sasaki 1 The Department of Cardiology, Suwa Central Hospital , Chino, Nagano, Japan MD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Masayuki Yoshimura 1 The Department of Cardiology, Suwa Central Hospital , Chino, Nagano, Japan MD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Miki Takahashi 1 The Department of Cardiology, Suwa Central Hospital , Chino, Nagano, Japan MD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Tadamasa Wakabayashi 1 The Department of Cardiology, Suwa Central Hospital , Chino, Nagano, Japan MD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Taku Imai 1 The Department of Cardiology, Suwa Central Hospital , Chino, Nagano, Japan MD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF 2. Abstract Background Ostial stenosis, a narrowing at the origin of coronary side branches, is commonly observed in branches diverging from stenotic coronary segments. However, it may also occur in branches diverging from non-stenotic segments, and the factors contributing to this phenomenon remain unclear. Objectives This study aimed to assess the incidence of ostial stenosis in coronary side branches diverging from non-stenotic segments and to identify associated risk factors. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of first-time, elective coronary angiograms (CAGs) from 884 patients. Side branches with a diameter larger than 2mm were included. Ostial stenosis was defined by two criteria: 1) the side branch diverged from a coronary segment with less than 25% diameter stenosis, and 2) the side branch exhibited ostial narrowing with more than 50% diameter stenosis. Clinical factors, including diabetes mellitus and lipid profiles, were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of ostial stenosis. Results Of the 4,739 side branches analyzed, 508 (10.7%) exhibited ostial stenosis. Ostial stenosis was present in 285 (32.2%) patients. Patients with ostial stenosis had a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (60.0% vs. 33.0%, p <0.00001) and lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels (48.5 ± 14.6 mg/dL vs. 52.0 ± 14.9 mg/dL, p <0.01) compared to those without stenosis. No significant differences were found in other clinical factors. Multivariate analysis identified diabetes mellitus as an independent predictor of ostial stenosis (odds ratio: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.20-0.43, p <0.0001). Conclusions Ostial stenosis in side branches diverging from non-stenotic coronary segments is significantly associated with diabetes mellitus. In diabetic patients, factors such as negative arterial remodeling, insulin resistance, and endothelial dysfunction likely play key roles in the development of this condition. These findings suggest that ostial stenosis could be an additional marker of advanced coronary artery disease in diabetes. 3. Introduction Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is widely recognized as an effective treatment for coronary artery disease (CAD). 1 , 2 While standard stent implantation effectively addresses typical stenotic lesions in the main coronary arteries, bifurcation lesions, particularly ostial narrowing of a side branch, present unique challenges. 3 - 5 Ostial stenosis is commonly observed in side branches diverging from stenotic coronary segments, where plaque at the side branch ostium is often considered part of the plaque burden from the main coronary artery. However, ostial stenosis can also occur in side branches diverging from non-stenotic coronary segments, a phenomenon that is less well-understood and less commonly studied. Coronary arteriosclerosis progresses rapidly in patients with CAD risk factors, with diabetes mellitus being one of the most significant contributors. 6 In patients with diabetes mellitus, arteriosclerosis is accelerated by mechanisms such as insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction. 7 - 11 On coronary angiography (CAG), diabetic patients often exhibit diffuse stenotic lesions, calcification, and multivessel disease. 12 , 13 While diabetes mellitus is known to promote the development of stenosis in the main coronary arteries 14 , its effects on side branches, particularly in non-stenotic coronary segments, have not been as thoroughly examined. Study objective The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of ostial stenosis in side branches diverging from non-stenotic coronary segments, and to investigate the underlying factors, with a particular focus on the role of diabetes mellitus. 4. Methods Study design and participants This retrospective study analyzed first-time, elective diagnostic CAGs performed at Suwa Central Hospital between 2009 and 2019. The study aimed to investigate the relationship between the presence of ostial stenosis and background factors such as diabetes mellitus, age, and gender. Patients included in the study had no prior coronary interventions or surgical coronary therapies, and were excluded those with acute coronary syndromes, including unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction. Additionally, CAGs were excluded if a guidewire was used for distal coronary pressure assessment, regardless of whether PCI was performed. Primary outcome and inclusion criteria The primary outcome of this study was defined as ostial stenosis, characterized by narrowing at the origin of coronary side branches. Ostial stenosis was defined by two criteria: 1) the side branch diverging from a coronary segment with less than 25% diameter stenosis, and 2) the side branch exhibiting ostial narrowing with more than 50% diameter stenosis. Additionally, side branches included in the analysis were those with a diameter greater than 2 mm, while significant stenosis in the main coronary artery was defined as greater than 75% diameter stenosis. Procedure CAG was performed via radial or femoral artery access using 4- or 5-Fr diagnostic catheters with non-ionic contrast media (Iopamiron®; Bracco, Milan, Italy). An intravenous bolus of heparin (100 IU/kg) was administered prior to the procedure, and intracoronary nitrates were used to prevent vasospasm. Five experienced cardiologists independently assessed the severity of coronary stenosis via visual inspection. Laboratory Data Data were obtained from medical records, providing comprehensive clinical information relevant to the study measured using standard clinical methods. The analysis included age, sex, BMI, and risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking history as variables of interest. Biomarkers such as HDL cholesterol level, triglyceride (TG) level, LDL cholesterol level, and HbA1c were also adopted. Statistical analysis Continuous variables were summarized as means and standard deviations, and categorical variables as percentages. Comparisons between groups were performed using the unpaired t-test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify independent predictors of ostial stenosis, adjusting for potential confounders. Variables with a p -value <0.05 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore differences among specific populations, such as age groups or sex, to identify potential variations in the effects of predictors. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the findings, including the exclusion of patients with extreme HDL cholesterol levels (80 mg/dL). Missing data were minimal and handled using pairwise deletion to ensure maximum use of available data for each analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA), MedCalc (MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium), and SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Japan, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). A p -value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. 5. Results Participant characteristics and inclusion A total of 884 CAGs from 884 patients were retrospectively included and analyzed in this study. Figure 1A demonstrates ostial stenosis (90% diameter stenosis) in a side branch diverging from a non-stenotic coronary segment, while Figure 1B shows ostial stenosis (90% diameter stenosis) from a stenotic coronary segment. The former type was included in the definition of ostial stenosis. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Representative images of ostial stenosis in coronary side branches. A: Ostial stenosis in a side branch diverging from a non-stenotic coronary segment (arrow) . B: Ostial stenosis in a side branch diverging from a stenotic coronary segment (arrow) . There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between patients with and without ostial stenosis, such as age, gender, or body mass index (BMI)( Table1 ). However, diabetes mellitus was significantly more prevalent in the ostial stenosis group (59.6%) compared to the non-stenosis group (33.0%, p <0.00001). Additionally, HDL cholesterol levels were significantly lower in the ostial stenosis group (48.5±14.6 mg/dL) compared to the non-stenosis group (52.0±14.9 mg/dL, p <0.01), and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was significantly higher in the stenosis group (6.7±1.6% vs.6.2±1.2%, p <0.00001). Missing data for key variables (e.g., diabetes status and HDL cholesterol levels) were minimal, affecting less than 5% of participants. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients with and without ostial stenosis. Coronary angiograms and coronary arteriosclerosis findings Table 2 summarizes the CAG results. Ostial stenosis was observed in 285 cases (32.2%) of the 884 CAGs. Multivessel disease was significantly more frequent in the ostial stenosis group compared to the non-stenosis group (30.2% vs. 14.4%, p <0.00001). View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 2. CAG data of patients with and without ostial stenosis. Main findings and specific analysis of side branches Of the 4,739 side branches analyzed, 508 (10.7%) exhibited ostial stenosis. Ostial stenosis occurred in 130 (31.0%) of 419 side branches in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery, 197 (29.1%) of 676 side branches of the left circumflex (LCX) artery, and 181 (26.6%) of 695 side branches of the right coronary artery (RCA), with no significant differences in prevalence across the arteries. Multivariate logistic regression analysis Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify independent predictors of ostial stenosis. Only age, sex, and the four risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking history) were included, totaling six variables in the model. The analysis identified diabetes mellitus as the sole independent predictor of ostial stenosis, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.29 (95% CI: 0.20-0.43, p <0.0001) after adjusting for other variables ( Table3 ). View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for ostial stenosis. 6. Discussion This study demonstrated that ostial stenosis in side branches diverging from non-stenotic coronary segments is associated with more advanced arteriosclerosis, a higher incidence of stenotic lesions, and a greater prevalence of multivessel disease. Diabetes mellitus was identified as an independent risk factor for ostial stenosis in these branches. While previous studies have shown that bifurcation lesions, including ostial stenosis, are more common in diabetic patients 15 , the condition of the main coronary segment from which the side branch diverges has been largely overlooked. Our findings highlight that ostial stenosis in side branches from non-stenotic segments is a notable feature of diabetic patients. In diabetic coronary arteries, diffuse stenotic lesions, calcification, and multivessel disease are well-established characteristics. 12 , 13 This study adds ostial stenosis of side branches diverging from non-stenotic segments as another important feature. The incidence of ostial stenosis was around 10% in the side branches analyzed, with a slight prevalence in the LAD, although this was not statistically significant. The mechanism underlying ostial stenosis in side branches diverging from non-stenotic coronary segments is not fully understood, but reduced shear stress and endothelial dysfunction likely play a role. Sheer stress is typically lower in the upstream ostial area, contributing to impaired endothelial function and accelerated plaque formation. 16 - 19 Our findings suggest that diabetes mellitus, through mechanisms such as insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction, contributes significantly to the development of ostial stenosis. We propose that negative arterial remodelling in diabetes mellitus 20 - 22 plays a key role in the development of ostial stenosis. In non-diabetic coronary arteries, positive remodelling allows for arterial expansion, preventing ostial narrowing. However, in diabetic arteries, negative remodelling leads to centripetal growth of the intimal tissue, resulting in stenosis ( Figure 2 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Possible mechanisms of the progression of ostial stenosis in diabetes mellitus. In positive remodeling in non-diabetic individuals, intimal tissue grows centrifugally and longitudinally (upper panel) . Incontrast, under negative remodeling in diabetes mellitus, intimal tissue grows centripetally (lower panel) . Ostial stenosis should be considered an additional characteristic of diabetic coronary artery disease, alongside diffuse lesions, calcification, and multivessel disease. Study limitation While the number of enrolled CAGs was sufficient for robust analysis, there are several limitations. First, stenosis assessment was based on visual estimation by cardiologists, which may introduce variability. Although this method is widely accepted in clinical practice, automated measurement tools might offer more precision in future studies. Second, this study was limited to patients undergoing elective CAG, which may not represent the broader population with different clinical presentations. Lastly, potential confounders such as other forms of arteriosclerosis, medication, and lifestyle factors were not fully captured in the dataset. Conclusions Ostial stenosis in side branches diverging from non-stenotic coronary segments is a significant finding in patients with coronary artery disease, especially those with diabetes mellitus. Identifying diabetes mellitus as a primary risk factor for this type of stenosis enhances our understanding of coronary artery disease’s progression in diabetic patients. Data Availability All data supporting the findings of this study are included within the manuscript. 8. Source of Funding None. 9. Disclosures None. 7. Acknowledgements None. Abbreviations CAG coronary angiogram PCI percutaneous coronary intervention HDL high-density lipoprotein CAD coronary artery disease 10. References 1. ↵ Lawton JS , Tamis-Holland JE , Bangalore S , Bates ER , Beckie TM , Bischoff JM , Bittl JA , Cohen MG , DiMaio JM , Don CW , et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines . Circulation 2022 ; 145 : e18 – e114 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 2. ↵ Knuuti J , Wijns W , Saraste A , Capodanno D , Barbato E , Funck-Brentano C , Prescott E , Storey RF , Deaton C , Cuisset T , et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes . Eur Heart J 2020 ; 41 : 407 – 477 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ Sawaya FJ , Lefèvre T , Chevalier B , Garot P , Hovasse T , Morice MC , Rab T , Louvard Y. Contemporary approach to coronary bifurcation lesion treatment . JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016 ; 9 : 1861 – 1878 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 4. Louvard Y , Lefèvre T , Morice MC . Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary disease . Heart 2004 ; 90 : 713 – 722 . OpenUrl FREE Full Text 5. ↵ Hildick-Smith D , Arunothayaraj S , Stankovic G , Chen SL . Percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions . EuroIntervention 2022 ; 18 : e273 – e291 . OpenUrl PubMed 6. ↵ Diabetes mellitus: a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease . A joint editorial statement by the American Diabetes Association; the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation International; the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; and the American Heart Association . Circulation 1999 ; 100 : 1132 – 1133 . OpenUrl FREE Full Text 7. ↵ Reyes-Soffer G , Holleran S , Di Tullio MR , Homma S , Boden-Albala B , Ramakrishnan R , Elkind MS , Sacco RL , Ginsberg HN . Endothelial function in individuals with coronary artery disease with and without type 2 diabetes . Metabolism 2010 ; 59 : 1365 – 1371 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 8. Hadi HA , Suwaidi JA . Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus . Vasc Health Risk Manag 2007 ; 3 : 853 – 876 . OpenUrl PubMed 9. Laakso M , Kuusisto J. Insulin resistance and hyperglycaemia in cardiovascular disease development . Nat Rev Endocrinol 2014 ; 10 : 293 – 302 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 10. Janus A , Szahidewicz-Krupska E , Mazur G , Doroszko A. Insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction constitute a common therapeutic target in cardiometabolic disorders . Mediators Inflamm 2016 ; 2016 : 3634948 . OpenUrl PubMed 11. ↵ Tabit CE , Chung WB , Hamburg NM , Vita JA . Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus: Molecular mechanisms and clinical implications . Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2010 ; 11 : 61 – 74 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 12. ↵ Norhammar A , Malmberg K , Diderholm E , Lagerqvist B , Lindahl B , Rydén L , Wallentin L. Diabetes mellitus: the major risk factor in unstable coronary artery disease even after consideration of the extent of coronary artery disease and benefits of revascularization . J Am Coll Cardiol 2004 ; 43 : 585 – 591 . OpenUrl FREE Full Text 13. ↵ Creager MA , Lüscher TF , Cosentino F , Beckman JA . Diabetes and vascular disease: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and medical therapy: Part I . Circulation 2003 ; 108 : 1527 – 1532 . OpenUrl FREE Full Text 14. ↵ Vigorito C , Betocchi S , Bonzani G , Giudice P , Miceli D , Piscione F , Condorelli M. Severity of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus. Angiographic study of 34 diabetic and 120 nondiabetic patients . Am Heart J 1980 ; 100 : 782 – 7 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 15. ↵ Baris N , Akdeniz B , Uyar S , Ozel E , Kirimli O , Badak O , Aslan O , Guneri S. Are complex coronary lesions more frequent in patients with diabetes mellitus? Can J Cardiol 2006 ; 22 : 935 – 937 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 16. ↵ Hong S , Dong Y , Song D , Liu M , Gao W , Li W , Wan Y , Du Y , Xu J , Dong F. Precise evaluation of blood flow patterns in human carotid bifurcation based on high-framerate vector flow imaging . J Clin Ultrasound 2023 ; 51 : 1070 – 1077 . OpenUrl PubMed 17. Gharleghi R , Sowmya A , Beier S. Transient wall shear stress estimation in coronary bifurcations using convolutional neural networks . Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2022 ; 225 : 107013 . OpenUrl PubMed 18. Urschel K , Tauchi M , Achenbach S , Dietel B. Investigation of wall shear stress in cardiovascular research and in clinical practice—from bench to bedside . Int J Mol Sci 2021 ; 22 : 5635 . OpenUrl PubMed 19. ↵ Lauric A , Hippelheuser JE , Malek AM . Induction of aneurysmogenic high positive wall shear stress gradient by wide angle at cerebral bifurcations, independent of flow rate . J Neurosurg 2018 ; 131 : 442 – 452 . OpenUrl PubMed 20. ↵ Nicholls SJ , Tuzcu EM , Kalidindi S , Wolski K , Moon KW , Sipahi I , Schoenhagen P , Nissen SE . Effect of diabetes on progression of coronary atherosclerosis and arterial remodeling: a pooled analysis of 5 intravascular ultrasound trials . J Am Coll Cardiol 2008 ; 52 : 255 – 262 . OpenUrl FREE Full Text 21. Mintz GS . Diabetic coronary artery disease: how little we know and how little intravascular ultrasound has taught us . J Am Coll Cardiol 2008 ; 52 : 263 – 265 . OpenUrl FREE Full Text 22. ↵ Spinetti G , Kraenkel N , Emanueli C , Madeddu P. Diabetes and vessel wall remodelling: from mechanistic insights to regenerative therapies . Cardiovasc Res 2008 ; 78 : 265 – 273 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted October 22, 2024. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Ostial side branch stenosis in non-stenotic coronary segments: a characteristic finding in diabetes mellitus Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Ostial side branch stenosis in non-stenotic coronary segments: a characteristic finding in diabetes mellitus Yasushi Yamanaka , Yoshiharu Fujimori , Satoshi Hashimoto , Kazuto Kurihara , Tomoko Sasaki , Masayuki Yoshimura , Miki Takahashi , Tadamasa Wakabayashi , Taku Imai medRxiv 2024.10.18.24315629; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.18.24315629 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Ostial side branch stenosis in non-stenotic coronary segments: a characteristic finding in diabetes mellitus Yasushi Yamanaka , Yoshiharu Fujimori , Satoshi Hashimoto , Kazuto Kurihara , Tomoko Sasaki , Masayuki Yoshimura , Miki Takahashi , Tadamasa Wakabayashi , Taku Imai medRxiv 2024.10.18.24315629; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.18.24315629 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Cardiovascular Medicine Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (573) Allergy and Immunology (865) Anesthesia (304) Cardiovascular Medicine (4457) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (445) Dermatology (383) Emergency Medicine (610) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1517) Epidemiology (15244) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1132) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6621) Geriatric Medicine (669) Health Economics (1002) Health Informatics (4557) Health Policy (1372) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1615) Hematology (543) HIV/AIDS (1272) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15936) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1106) Medical Education (624) Medical Ethics (147) Nephrology (670) Neurology (6635) Nursing (346) Nutrition (999) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1148) Occupational and Environmental Health (957) Oncology (3348) Ophthalmology (980) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (421) Pain Medicine (436) Palliative Medicine (130) Pathology (665) Pediatrics (1696) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (693) Primary Care Research (714) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5463) Public and Global Health (9257) Radiology and Imaging (2210) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1371) Respiratory Medicine (1198) Rheumatology (598) Sexual and Reproductive Health (716) Sports Medicine (532) Surgery (714) Toxicology (100) Transplantation (289) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a03745378f513fe2',t:'MTc4MDA3NjI4MQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.