Open-label placebos: A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies with non-clinical samples
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Background: The use of open-label placebos (OLPs) has been shown to be effective in clinical trials. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine whether OLPs are effective in experimental studies with non-clinical populations. Methods: : We searched five electronic databases on April 15, 2021. We conducted separate analyses for self-reported and objective outcomes and examined whether the level of suggestiveness of the instructions influenced the effectiveness of OLPs. Results: : Of 3,573 identified records, 20 studies comprising 1,201 participants were included. We found a significant effect of OLPs for self-reported outcomes (SMD=0.43; 95% CI=0.28, 0.58; I 2 = 7.2%) but not for objective outcomes (SMD=-0.02; 95% CI=-0.25, 0.21; I 2 = 43.6%). The level of suggestiveness of the instructions influenced the effectiveness of OLPs for objective outcomes ( p =.02), but not for self-reported outcomes. Discussion: OLPs appear to be effective when examined in experimental studies. However, the small number of studies highlights the need for further research.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00