Ketamine versus dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomized clinical trial

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15

This study compared ketamine and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks, finding both improved postoperative pain relief and reduced analgesic needs compared to bupivacaine alone, with dexmedetomidine showing greater efficacy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15 · read from full text

This double-blind randomized clinical trial studied 75 adult patients undergoing elective elbow/forearm/wrist/hand surgery to compare ketamine (1 mg/kg) versus dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) as additives to 0.25% bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block, with a bupivacaine-only control group. Compared with control, both ketamine and dexmedetomidine reduced postoperative VAS pain scores over the first 24 hours, with greater reduction in the dexmedetomidine group, and both groups had later time to first analgesic request (dexmedetomidine 9.48 h, ketamine 7.08 h, control 5.00 h) and decreased diclofenac consumption; sedation scores were also recorded. The study’s key caveat explicitly noted in the record is that this is a Research Square preprint that has not been peer reviewed. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Peripheral nerve block has gained increased popularity due to less postoperative pain, reduced need for postoperative analgesic drugs, reduction of PACU time, and improved patient satisfaction. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of ketamine and dexmedetomidine as additives to bupivacaine on onset and duration of the block, post-operative VAS, and analgesic consumption, after ultrasound-guided supraclavicular nerve block. Methods: 75 adult patients undergoing elective operations of the elbow, forearm, wrist, or hand were randomly allocated into three groups of 25 patients each. Group K (ketamine group) received 40 ml 0.25% bupivacaine contain 1 mg/kg ketamine, Group D (dexmedetomidine group) received 40 ml 0.25% bupivacaine contain 1ug/kg dexmedetomidine, group C (control group) received 40 ml 0.25% bupivacaine. The outcome measures included visual analog scale (VAS, 0 = no pain 10 cm = the most severe pain), time to first analgesic request, and total dose of diclofenac analgesia given postoperatively. Sedation score also recorded in all groups Results: Patients in D and K groups had reduced VAS scores than the C group, at all-time points after surgery during the first 24 hours, with more reduction in D than K group ( P < 0.05). The time of the first analgesic request in the D group was significantly more than in the K group and both were more than the C group (9.48±1.417 h, 7.08 ±1.255 h, and 5.00 ± 1.04 h respectively). Conclusions: The addition of ketamine or dexmedetomidine in the ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block could improve the postoperative pain and need for analgesia. Therefore, we can consider the low price more available ketamine as a comparable adjuvant in brachial plexus block to some extent as dexmedetomidine. Trial registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04508894, Date of registration (02/21/2019).
Full text 15,586 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Ketamine versus dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomized clinical trial | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Ketamine versus dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomized clinical trial Ahmed mohmed, Abeer Hassanein, Haidy Mansour This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-128342/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background: Peripheral nerve block has gained increased popularity due to less postoperative pain, reduced need for postoperative analgesic drugs, reduction of PACU time, and improved patient satisfaction. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of ketamine and dexmedetomidine as additives to bupivacaine on onset and duration of the block, post-operative VAS, and analgesic consumption, after ultrasound-guided supraclavicular nerve block. Methods: 75 adult patients undergoing elective operations of the elbow, forearm, wrist, or hand were randomly allocated into three groups of 25 patients each. Group K (ketamine group) received 40 ml 0.25% bupivacaine contain 1 mg/kg ketamine, Group D (dexmedetomidine group) received 40 ml 0.25% bupivacaine contain 1ug/kg dexmedetomidine, group C (control group) received 40 ml 0.25% bupivacaine. The outcome measures included visual analog scale (VAS, 0 = no pain 10 cm = the most severe pain), time to first analgesic request, and total dose of diclofenac analgesia given postoperatively. Sedation score also recorded in all groups Results: Patients in D and K groups had reduced VAS scores than the C group, at all-time points after surgery during the first 24 hours, with more reduction in D than K group ( P < 0.05). The time of the first analgesic request in the D group was significantly more than in the K group and both were more than the C group (9.48±1.417 h, 7.08 ±1.255 h, and 5.00 ± 1.04 h respectively). Conclusions: The addition of ketamine or dexmedetomidine in the ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block could improve the postoperative pain and need for analgesia. Therefore, we can consider the low price more available ketamine as a comparable adjuvant in brachial plexus block to some extent as dexmedetomidine. Trial registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04508894, Date of registration (02/21/2019). Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine ketamine dexmedetomidine supraclavicular brachial plexus block anesthesia Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Full Text Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-128342","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":7725796,"identity":"5112f0a2-faa6-442f-b407-9863b5304b8d","order_by":0,"name":"Ahmed mohmed","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Minia University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ahmed","middleName":"","lastName":"mohmed","suffix":""},{"id":7725797,"identity":"58438f27-50b2-43fd-887a-bd55d30f7c09","order_by":1,"name":"Abeer Hassanein","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Minia University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Abeer","middleName":"","lastName":"Hassanein","suffix":""},{"id":7725798,"identity":"de277ab0-4fe6-47ea-98e1-75efcf854edd","order_by":2,"name":"Haidy Mansour","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Minia University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Haidy","middleName":"","lastName":"Mansour","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2020-12-14 13:59:15","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-128342/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-128342/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":4875644,"identity":"e380d016-f597-4a5c-bcc2-d2baf8a73598","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-01-11 22:40:47","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":35913,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"CONSORT diagram showing the flow of participants","description":"","filename":"Fig1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-128342/v1/ea2c7a9437ac59aff8d6b29c.png"},{"id":4875465,"identity":"bb6cc6c0-8b46-4f4b-b18f-63dd4ebcfdce","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-01-11 22:34:47","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":74410,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Heart rate changes in the study groups","description":"","filename":"Fig2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-128342/v1/4b1b54356cc574e8845c22a8.png"},{"id":4875432,"identity":"c9add2a5-ffc9-43de-bf41-dd830ce5d489","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-01-11 22:31:47","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":69131,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Mean arterial pressure changes in the study groups","description":"","filename":"Fig3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-128342/v1/ee230241c87ed73f6b9c1717.png"},{"id":4875466,"identity":"52cdade2-7aad-486a-a8ff-8c48b29b17a1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-01-11 22:34:47","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":36647,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"mean time to sensory and motor block onset in the study groups.","description":"","filename":"Fig4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-128342/v1/9c19f744d9b2a693d75e91e6.png"},{"id":4875468,"identity":"3b23c245-e7bf-4324-a9d7-8e1024071143","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-01-11 22:34:47","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":35991,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"mean sensory and motor block duration in the study groups.","description":"","filename":"Fig5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-128342/v1/8db6bd136232f10a888bb464.png"},{"id":4875569,"identity":"afe2f03a-4577-4a5a-9927-d97fa5313056","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-01-11 22:37:47","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":57029,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"mean post-operative VAS in the study groups.","description":"","filename":"Fig6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-128342/v1/803ff18bb7f166528d2875b0.png"},{"id":4875571,"identity":"3c315fe8-6915-487b-97aa-bc895ce2bc56","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-01-11 22:37:47","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":67259,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"mean sedation score in the study groups.","description":"","filename":"Fig7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-128342/v1/bb2c6466d6c4f771dcf84d2f.png"},{"id":13573806,"identity":"96d5d260-395d-4984-b15b-e2b032cee766","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-09-17 03:56:30","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":909825,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"KetamineversusdexmedetomidineBMC3.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-128342/v1_covered.pdf"},{"id":4875694,"identity":"eb556113-2f7b-4d5b-bc86-f7d42adb7185","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-01-11 22:43:51","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":675745,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"KetamineversusdexmedetomidineBMC3.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-128342/v1_stamped.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eKetamine versus dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomized clinical trial\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Full Text","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis preprint is available for \u003ca href='/article/rs-128342/latest.pdf' target='_blank'\u003edownload as a PDF\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"ketamine, dexmedetomidine, supraclavicular brachial plexus block, anesthesia","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-128342/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-128342/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eBackground:\u0026nbsp;Peripheral nerve block has gained increased popularity due to less postoperative pain, reduced need for postoperative analgesic drugs, reduction of PACU time, and improved patient satisfaction. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of ketamine and dexmedetomidine as additives to bupivacaine on onset and duration of the block, post-operative VAS, and analgesic consumption, after ultrasound-guided supraclavicular nerve block. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMethods: 75 adult patients undergoing elective operations of the elbow, forearm, wrist, or hand were randomly allocated into three groups of 25 patients each. Group K (ketamine group) received 40 ml 0.25% bupivacaine contain 1 mg/kg ketamine, Group D (dexmedetomidine group) received 40 ml 0.25% bupivacaine contain 1ug/kg dexmedetomidine, group C (control group) received 40 ml 0.25% bupivacaine. The outcome measures included visual analog scale (VAS, 0 = no pain 10 cm = the most severe pain), time to first analgesic request, and total dose of diclofenac analgesia given postoperatively. Sedation score also recorded in all groups \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eResults: Patients in D and K groups had reduced VAS scores than the C group, at all-time points after surgery during the first 24 hours, with more reduction in D than K group ( P \u0026lt; 0.05). The time of the first analgesic request in the D group was significantly more than in the K group and both were more than the C group (9.48±1.417 h, 7.08 ±1.255 h, and 5.00 ± 1.04 h respectively). \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eConclusions: The addition of ketamine or dexmedetomidine in the ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block could improve the postoperative pain and need for analgesia. Therefore, we can consider the low price more available ketamine as a comparable adjuvant in brachial plexus block to some extent as dexmedetomidine. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTrial registration:\u0026nbsp;https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04508894, Date of registration (02/21/2019). \u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Ketamine versus dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomized clinical trial","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2021-01-11 22:31:45","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-128342/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"c96a9077-c51a-4fca-aad0-2fdfb3627e8d","owner":[],"postedDate":"January 11th, 2021","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":1810481,"name":"Anesthesiology \u0026 Pain Medicine"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2021-04-01T07:44:10+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2021-01-11 22:31:45","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-128342","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-128342","identity":"rs-128342","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"_2-kVJe1T_tPrBINL-cwx","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00