Impact of admixture and ancestry on eQTL analysis and GWAS colocalization in GTEx

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-30

This study mapped local ancestry in admixed GTEx individuals, finding local ancestry adjustment improved eQTL mapping power and showed subtle differences in GWAS colocalization compared to global ancestry adjustments.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background Population structure among study subjects may confound genetic association studies, and lack of proper correction can lead to spurious findings. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project largely contains individuals of European ancestry, but the final release (v8) also includes up to 15% of individuals of non-European ancestry. Assessing ancestry-based adjustments in GTEx provides an opportunity to improve portability of this research across populations and to further measure the impact of population structure on GWAS colocalization. Results Here, we identify a subset of 117 individuals in GTEx (v8) with a high degree of population admixture and estimate genome-wide local ancestry. We perform genome-wide cis -eQTL mapping using admixed samples in six tissues, adjusted by either global or local ancestry. Consistent with previous work, we observe improved power with local ancestry adjustment. At loci where the two adjustments produce different lead variants, we observe only 0.8% of tests with GWAS colocalization posterior probabilities that change by 10% or more. Notably, both adjustments produce similar numbers of significant colocalizations. Finally, we identify a small subset of GTEx v8 eQTL-associated variants highly correlated with local ancestry (R 2 > 0.7), providing a resource to enhance functional follow-up. Conclusions We provide a local ancestry map for admixed individuals in the final GTEx release and describe the impact of ancestry and admixture on gene expression, eQTLs, and GWAS colocalization. While the majority of results are concordant between local and global ancestry-based adjustments, we identify distinct advantages and disadvantages to each approach.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00