Long COVID risk and severity after COVID-19 infections and reinfections in Quebec healthcare workers

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

This retrospective cohort study used an electronic survey of 22,496 Quebec healthcare workers (with a short telephone survey among randomly selected non-respondents) to estimate and compare long COVID risk and severity after first versus reinfections. Long COVID was defined as self-reported COVID-19-attributed symptoms lasting at least 12 weeks, with severity classified as mild, moderate, or severe, and symptoms/functional limitations compared across long COVID cases, COVID controls, and non-COVID controls; risk was also stratified by number of infections, likely variant era, and perceived acute severity. The authors found similar overall long COVID risk after any infection (~17% online; ~16% telephone), but the cumulative risk rose with repeated infections while reinfections were associated with about threefold lower long COVID risk than first infections. Pre-Omicron and severe acute episodes correlated with higher long COVID risk/severity, symptom clustering identified seven symptom groups, and severe cases had multiple clusters and greater functional limitations; the paper does not describe in the provided text the extent of remaining limitations beyond its survey-based, self-reported design. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ABSTRACT Importance Long COVID, a chronic condition following SARS-CoV-2 infection, affects millions of people worldwide and can lead to significant functional impairment. Estimates of long COVID risk after a first COVID-19 infection vary, and data on risk following reinfections remain lacking. Objective To estimate and compare long COVID risk and severity with first COVID-19 infection versus reinfections among healthcare workers (HCWs). Design Retrospective cohort study based on an electronic survey among Quebec HCWs conducted between May 16 and June 15, 2023. A short telephone survey among randomly selected non-respondents further assessed potential response bias. Setting Population-based study in Quebec, Canada. Participants 397 222 HCWs were invited to participate in the electronic survey and 10 500 in the telephone survey. Main outcomes and measures We defined long COVID cases as HCWs self-reporting COVID-19-attributed symptoms lasting ≥12 weeks, classified as mild, moderate, or severe based on perceived symptom intensity. We compared self-reported symptoms and functional limitations of cases to COVID controls (infected participants without long COVID) and non-COVID controls (uninfected participants). Risk and prevalence were estimated by number of infections, likely infecting variant and perceived acute COVID-19 severity. We conducted symptom clustering analyses using unsupervised learning techniques. Results Estimated long COVID risk following any COVID-19 infection was similar among 22 496 online survey participants (17.0% [95%CI, 16.3%–17.6%] and 3 978 telephone survey participants (15.9% [14.6%–17.2%]. The cumulative risk increased with the number of infections, but reinfections were associated with three times lower risk of long COVID than first infections. Pre-Omicron infections and severe acute COVID-19 episodes correlated with higher long COVID risk and severity. Among prevalent long COVID cases, 43% were moderate and 33% severe. Compared to controls, dyspnea, neurocognitive symptoms, post-exertional malaise and smell/taste disturbances were most strongly associated with long COVID. Cluster analysis identified seven symptom groups with systemic, neurocognitive, pulmonary, and mood-related clusters being the most prevalent. Severe long COVID cases exhibited multiple symptom clusters and greater functional limitations. Conclusions Long COVID is a common and disabling condition among HCWs. Societal and healthcare burden remains important and will continue to accrue given ongoing SARS-CoV-2 transmission and long COVID risk with reinfections. KEY POINTS Question Does the risk and severity of long COVID differ for first COVID-19 infections versus reinfections among healthcare workers in Quebec, Canada? Findings The risk of long COVID was ∼15% with first COVID-19 infection, but three-fold lower with reinfections. Risk was higher with COVID-19 infections due to ancestral strains and with more severe acute episodes. Long COVID risk and severity compromised self-rated health, physical capacity and cognitive function. Meaning Long COVID is a common and disabling condition among workers. Societal and healthcare burden remains important and will continue to accrue given ongoing SARS-CoV-2 transmission and long COVID risk with reinfections.
Full text 52,440 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Long COVID risk and severity after COVID-19 infections and reinfections in Quebec healthcare workers | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Long COVID risk and severity after COVID-19 infections and reinfections in Quebec healthcare workers Sara Carazo , Manale Ouakki , View ORCID Profile Nektaria Nicolakakis , View ORCID Profile Emilia Liana Falcone , Danuta M Skowronski , View ORCID Profile Marie-José Durand , View ORCID Profile Marie-France Coutu , View ORCID Profile Simon Décary , Isaora Z Dialahy , View ORCID Profile Olivia Drescher , View ORCID Profile Elisabeth Canitrot , Carrie Anna McGinn , View ORCID Profile Philippe Latouche , View ORCID Profile Robert Laforce , Clemence Dallaire , Geoffroy Denis , Alain Piché , View ORCID Profile Gaston De Serres doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.08.25327059 Sara Carazo 1 Social and preventive medicine department, Faculty of medicine, Laval University , Quebec City, Quebec, Canada 2 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec–Université Laval Research Center , Quebec City, Quebec, Canada 3 Department of biological risks. National Institute of Public Health of Quebec. Quebec City , Quebec, Canada MD PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: sara.carazo{at}inspq.qc.ca sara.carazo-perez.1{at}ulaval.ca Manale Ouakki 3 Department of biological risks. National Institute of Public Health of Quebec. Quebec City , Quebec, Canada MSc Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Nektaria Nicolakakis 4 Department of Environmental and Occupational Health and of Toxicology. National Institute of Public Health of Quebec , Montreal, Quebec, Canada PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Nektaria Nicolakakis Emilia Liana Falcone 5 Center for Immunity, Inflammation and Infectious Diseases, Montreal Clinical Research Institute , Montreal, Quebec, Canada 6 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal , Montreal, Quebec, Canada MD, PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Emilia Liana Falcone Danuta M Skowronski 7 Immunization Programs and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Services, BC Centre for Disease Control , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada MD FRCPC Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Marie-José Durand 8 School of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Sherbrooke, QC, Canada 9 Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne Research Center , Longueuil, Quebec, Canada PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Marie-José Durand Marie-France Coutu 8 School of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Sherbrooke, QC, Canada PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Marie-France Coutu Simon Décary 8 School of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Sherbrooke, QC, Canada 10 Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l’Estrie-Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Simon Décary Isaora Z Dialahy 11 Office of Information and Studies on Population Health, National Institute of Public Health of Quebec , Quebec City, Quebec, Canada PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Olivia Drescher 2 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec–Université Laval Research Center , Quebec City, Quebec, Canada MSc Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Olivia Drescher Elisabeth Canitrot 4 Department of Environmental and Occupational Health and of Toxicology. National Institute of Public Health of Quebec , Montreal, Quebec, Canada PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Elisabeth Canitrot Carrie Anna McGinn 12 Patient-research partner MSc Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Philippe Latouche 12 Patient-research partner Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Philippe Latouche Robert Laforce 2 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec–Université Laval Research Center , Quebec City, Quebec, Canada MD, PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Robert Laforce Clemence Dallaire 13 Faculty of nursing, Laval University , Quebec City, Quebec, Canada PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Geoffroy Denis 14 Ministry of Health and Social Services , Quebec City, Quebec, Canada 15 School of Population and Global Health, McGill University , Montreal, Quebec, Canada MD MSc Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Alain Piché 10 Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l’Estrie-Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada MD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Gaston De Serres 1 Social and preventive medicine department, Faculty of medicine, Laval University , Quebec City, Quebec, Canada MD PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Gaston De Serres Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Data/Code Preview PDF ABSTRACT Importance Long COVID, a chronic condition following SARS-CoV-2 infection, affects millions of people worldwide and can lead to significant functional impairment. Estimates of long COVID risk after a first COVID-19 infection vary, and data on risk following reinfections remain lacking. Objective To estimate and compare long COVID risk and severity with first COVID-19 infection versus reinfections among healthcare workers (HCWs). Design Retrospective cohort study based on an electronic survey among Quebec HCWs conducted between May 16 and June 15, 2023. A short telephone survey among randomly selected non-respondents further assessed potential response bias. Setting Population-based study in Quebec, Canada. Participants 397 222 HCWs were invited to participate in the electronic survey and 10 500 in the telephone survey. Main outcomes and measures We defined long COVID cases as HCWs self-reporting COVID-19-attributed symptoms lasting ≥12 weeks, classified as mild, moderate, or severe based on perceived symptom intensity. We compared self-reported symptoms and functional limitations of cases to COVID controls (infected participants without long COVID) and non-COVID controls (uninfected participants). Risk and prevalence were estimated by number of infections, likely infecting variant and perceived acute COVID-19 severity. We conducted symptom clustering analyses using unsupervised learning techniques. Results Estimated long COVID risk following any COVID-19 infection was similar among 22 496 online survey participants (17.0% [95%CI, 16.3%–17.6%] and 3 978 telephone survey participants (15.9% [14.6%–17.2%]. The cumulative risk increased with the number of infections, but reinfections were associated with three times lower risk of long COVID than first infections. Pre-Omicron infections and severe acute COVID-19 episodes correlated with higher long COVID risk and severity. Among prevalent long COVID cases, 43% were moderate and 33% severe. Compared to controls, dyspnea, neurocognitive symptoms, post-exertional malaise and smell/taste disturbances were most strongly associated with long COVID. Cluster analysis identified seven symptom groups with systemic, neurocognitive, pulmonary, and mood-related clusters being the most prevalent. Severe long COVID cases exhibited multiple symptom clusters and greater functional limitations. Conclusions Long COVID is a common and disabling condition among HCWs. Societal and healthcare burden remains important and will continue to accrue given ongoing SARS-CoV-2 transmission and long COVID risk with reinfections. Question Does the risk and severity of long COVID differ for first COVID-19 infections versus reinfections among healthcare workers in Quebec, Canada? Findings The risk of long COVID was ∼15% with first COVID-19 infection, but three-fold lower with reinfections. Risk was higher with COVID-19 infections due to ancestral strains and with more severe acute episodes. Long COVID risk and severity compromised self-rated health, physical capacity and cognitive function. Meaning Long COVID is a common and disabling condition among workers. Societal and healthcare burden remains important and will continue to accrue given ongoing SARS-CoV-2 transmission and long COVID risk with reinfections. INTRODUCTION Long COVID, also known as post-COVID-19 condition, is an infection-associated chronic multi-systemic condition, with symptoms lasting at least three months, and presenting as a continuous, relapsing and remitting, or progressive disease state. 1 Affected individuals often experience significant functional impairment, as well as emotional and physical distress. It is estimated that over 400 million people worldwide suffer from long COVID. 2 , 3 While long COVID risk after a first COVID-19 episode varies from 10% to 70% for ambulatory and hospitalized acute cases, 4 , 5 data on long COVID risk and severity following reinfections are limited. 6 In the absence of specific diagnostic biomarkers, long COVID cases are often identified based on one or more persistent symptoms beyond 3 months post-COVID-19. 7 Long COVID symptoms are both non-specific and common, and present in a substantial proportion of patients without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. 8 Therefore, studies using this case-definition without considering severity, functional impact and COVID-19-attribution likely overestimate long COVID prevalence. Most published studies have not assessed long COVID severity or did not compare symptoms between long COVID cases and controls. 9 – 12 From a public health perspective, cases severe enough to impact functional status are most relevant and are unlikely to present with the same symptom profile as people without long COVID. Based on a population survey among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Quebec, Canada, we estimated long COVID risk after first and subsequent COVID-19 infections since the onset of the pandemic, as well as long COVID prevalence and severity in the spring of 2023. We compared long COVID cases and controls on symptom frequency, severity and impact on functional status and identified distinct long COVID phenotypes using clustering analyses. METHODS This study was legally mandated by the National Director of Public Health of Quebec under the Quebec Public Health Act and approved by the CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Ethics Committee. Electronic or verbal consent was obtained from all participants. The study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline. Study Design and Population This retrospective cohort study was conducted via an electronic survey among Quebec HCWs from May 16 to June 15, 2023. Eligible participants were HCWs aged ≥18, residing in Quebec and able to communicate in French or English. They had to have been working in the Quebec public healthcare network during the pandemic or registered in one of six professional orders including: physicians, nurses, nursing assistants, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, and midwives. Recruitment and Data Collection Online Survey HCWs received an email invitation to complete a 45-minute self-administered online survey. Data collected included sociodemographic information (sex, age, and race/ethnicity), employment characteristics (occupation and workplace), and COVID-19 history (number of infections, laboratory confirmation, symptoms, severity, and duration of each episode). The survey queried 20 symptoms selected based on reported frequency in the literature and expert opinion. 9 , 13 Cases were asked about symptoms related to COVID-19 that lasted ≥12 weeks and were still present at the time of the survey with their severity rated on a three-point scale (mild, moderate, severe). Controls were also queried about symptoms present at the time of survey that had lasted ≥2 weeks. Information on comorbidities was obtained from the Provincial Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System of Quebec, updated on March 31, 2021. 14 Participants reported perceived health status, functional disability due to dyspnea (Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea [mMRC] Scale), and cognitive impairment on daily life. 15 Telephone Survey To address possible low participation in the online survey, potentially leading to bias, we conducted a short validation sub-study by phone between May 8 and July 5, 2023, among 7 500 randomly selected non-respondents and 3 000 non-vaccinated HCWs without email access. The telephone survey included 5 questions on COVID-19 history, symptom duration, and persistence at the time of the interview. Consenting participants were invited to complete the online survey. The recruitment process is described in Supplement_eFigure_1. SARS-CoV-2 variant classification was based on provincial laboratory data on dominant variants at the time of each self-reported infection and reinfection. 16 Long COVID Case and Control Definitions Long COVID cases were HCWs with self-reported post-COVID-19-attributed symptom(s) lasting ≥12 weeks. Cases were classified as: Prevalent, if any symptom was present at survey time, Recovered, if symptoms had resolved at survey time, Undetermined, if information on symptoms was missing or contradictory. Long COVID severity was assessed only in prevalent cases, classified as mild (only mild symptoms), moderate (≥1 moderate but no severe symptoms), or severe (≥1 severe symptom). Controls included participants without self-reported history of COVID-19 (non-COVID controls) and those who had COVID-19 without persistent symptoms at ≥12-week follow-up (COVID controls). Statistical analysis We compared the sociodemographic and employment characteristics of participants within the target population. Long COVID risk was calculated as: (Long COVID cases/COVID cases with onset ≥ 12 weeks before survey date). . We calculated long COVID risk by number of infections (one to three), likely infecting variant, and severity of the acute COVID-19 episode over the entire study period and specifically for the Omicron period. Reinfection risk was estimated only for participants without long COVID after their first infection. Long COVID prevalence among HCWs was calculated as: (long COVID cases prevalent at survey date/all participants) . Binomial 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for both measures. Using prevalence ratios (PRs), we compared cases and controls on the frequency, severity and number of symptoms. Sensitivity analyses excluded participants who reported the presence of all symptoms listed in the survey, considered unlikely, to assess for potential questionnaire biases. Cluster analysis of long COVID symptoms was conducted using unsupervised learning with K-means clustering followed by descending hierarchical classification(REF=Hastie). 17 . Cluster numbers were determined using eigenvalues and validated by physicians with clinical expertise in long COVID. The frequency of each cluster was assessed globally and by long COVID severity. RESULTS Study Population Among the 397 222 HCWs invited by email to participate in the online survey, 30 237 (7.6%) accessed the survey (Supplement_eFigure_1). Among these, 4 432 declined to participate, 4 287 were excluded primarily due to invalid or incomplete responses (n=3 375) and 21 518 (5.4%) completed the online survey and were included in the analysis. For the validation study, 53.0% (3 978/7 500) of non-respondents to the email invitation and 36.1% (1 083/3 000) of unvaccinated HCWs answered the five-question telephone survey. Among them, 829 (11.1%) and 149 (5.0%), respectively, thereafter completed the online survey and were included in the final dataset. Compared to the target population of 397 222 HCWs, online survey participants were comparable in terms of sex, comorbidities and region of residence but were older, received more vaccine doses and were more likely to occupy social services and managerial roles. In contrast, telephone survey participants recruited among non-respondents were broadly representative of the target population (Supplement_eTable_1). Online survey participants were predominantly female, as generally reflective of the healthcare workforce, self-identified as white, with a median age of 45 years, and worked as nurses, social services professionals, auxiliary staff or managerial and administrative personnel in acute-care hospitals (Table_1). Among 22 496 online participants, 5 434 (24.2%) reported never having had a SARS-CoV-2 infection (non-COVID controls), 13 865 (61.6%) had at least one SARS-CoV-2 infection with onset ≥12 weeks before the survey but without persistent symptoms (COVID controls), and 2 796 (12.4%) had at least one infection with symptoms persisting ≥12 weeks (long COVID cases). Non-COVID controls were more likely to be male, aged ≥60 years and had multiple comorbidities compared to COVID controls across both online and telephone participants. Although COVID-19 attribution was primarily based upon self-reported infection or reinfection, >80% of long-COVID cases and 75% of COVID controls had a documented laboratory-confirmed infection. Long COVID Risk and Prevalence The overall risk of long COVID among HCWs with COVID-19 was similar between online and telephone survey participants: 17.0% (95% CI, 16.3%–17.6%) vs. 15.9% (14.6%–17.2%) (Table_2). Long COVID prevalence at survey time, however, was much lower among telephone survey participants (5.6% [95% CI, 4.9%–6.3%]) than among online survey participants (11.0% [10.5%–11.4%]), with the former likely more representative of the true long COVID prevalence among HCWs. The cumulative risk of long COVID increased with the number of reported COVID-19 infections, rising from 13.7% (95% CI, 13.1%–14.4%) for a single infection to 37.0% (33.0%–40.9%) for 3 infections in the online survey, and from 11.8% (a single infection) to 29.5% (≥3 infections) in the telephone survey (Figure_1, Table_1, Supplement_eTable_2). However, the risk of long COVID was approximately three times higher after the initial infection (14.8% [95% CI, 14.3%–15.3%]) than after first (5.8% [5.1%–6.6%]) or second (5.3% [3.1%–7.4%]) reinfections. For each infection, long COVID risk was highest when attributed to the ancestral strain compared to later variants, but still showing the same pattern of higher risk with first infection vs. reinfection for each variant (Figure_1). The risk was also higher among HCWs with severe acute COVID-19, particularly those requiring hospitalization or ambulatory cases reporting ≥3 severe symptoms. Conversely, the risk of long COVID was <5% for HCWs with moderate and mild COVID-19 for both first infection and reinfections. The pattern of highest risk with first infection and with more severe acute COVID-19 persisted in analyses restricted to Omicron cases (Figure_1, Supplement_eTable_3). Omicron infections, responsible for 78.6% of all long COVID cases, were associated with a similar long COVID risk regardless of subvariants (BA.1 to XBB) (Figure_1, Supplement_eFigure_2). Overall, the distribution of long COVID severity was similar for cases occurring after first or second infection, with the highest proportion of severe long COVID cases occurring after a severe acute COVID-19 episode (Supplement_eFigure_3). Symptoms at survey time and symptom clustering Based on self-reported severity, 24.2% (n=515) of long COVID cases were classified as mild, 42.7% (n=907) as moderate, and 33.1% (n=703) as severe (Table_3). Among the 20 symptoms queried, the median number of reported symptoms increased with severity: 2 symptoms (0 moderate or severe) in mild cases, 5 symptoms (2 moderate or severe) in moderate cases and 11 symptoms (7 moderate or severe) in severe cases. In contrast, 60.8% of COVID controls and 51.0% of non-COVID controls reported no symptoms at survey time, with a median of 3 (1 moderate or severe) symptoms among those experiencing any. The most frequently reported symptoms among long COVID cases were fatigue, shortness of breath and cognitive symptoms (Supplement_eFigure_4). Each symptom was reported at least twice as often by participants with long COVID compared to COVID controls, with PRs ranging from 2.1 to 5.1, highest for shortness of breath, smell/taste disturbance, post-exertional malaise (PEM), and brain fog (Figure_2). Severe symptoms were reported 5 to 22 times more often by long COVID cases than by COVID controls, except for fever, cough, insomnia, anxiety, and depression (2.7 to 4.5 times). In sensitivity analyses excluding cases and controls reporting all symptoms, differences between cases and controls were not diminished (Supplement_eTable_4. Supplement_eFigure_5, Supplement_eFigure_6). Clustering analyses identified seven distinct symptom clusters, explaining 75.9% of total variance (Supplement_eFigure_7), that are detailed by severity of long COVID in Supplement_eFigure_8. The most common clusters globally and among severe cases included systemic, neurocognitive, pulmonary and mood-related symptoms. Overall, 19.3% of cases exhibited symptoms only from a single cluster; 42.8% in mild, 16.5% in moderate and 5.6% in severe cases. Smell/taste impairment was the most frequent cluster reported in isolation. Among 1 329 prevalent long COVID cases reporting a single COVID-19 episode, the mean duration of long COVID symptoms was 15 months, with 693 (52.1%) experiencing symptoms for ≥1 year, and 83 (6.2%) reporting symptoms lasting ≥3 years (Supplement_eTable_5). Recovered long COVID cases had a mean symptom duration of seven months, with 93 (61.6%) recovering within six months. Functional limitations Long COVID cases more often than COVID and non-COVID controls reported poor self-rated health (29.5% vs. 5.5% and 9.4%), moderate or severe effort performance limitations (23.0% vs. 3.4% and 5.6%), and cognitive impairments affecting daily life (e.g., 18.6% often/very often losing necessary items vs. about 6% among controls). These limitations were significantly more pronounced in severe long COVID cases (Table_3). DISCUSSION In this large population-based study of Quebec HCWs, conducted in the spring of 2023, the estimated overall risk of long COVID was 16-17%. This risk was highest following infection by the ancestral strain and lowest after Omicron infection that nevertheless caused most long COVID cases given its widespread transmission. Long COVID risk was higher after first infection compared to reinfection, whether by all variants considered together (14% vs. 5-6%) or Omicron only (13% vs. 3-5%). As of May 2023, the estimated long COVID prevalence among Quebec HCWs was 5.6%. Symptom number, severity and duration, clusters of symptoms and functional profiles were substantially different between moderate or severe long COVID cases vs. controls. The range of long COVID risk estimates in the published literature reflects differences in study periods, populations, case-definitions and case ascertainment approaches. 4 , 5 , 18 – 20 Our 16-17% overall risk of long COVID is comparable to estimates in various North American and UK cohorts. For instance the risk of long COVID was 22% in 14 cohorts followed from 2020 to 2023 in the United States, 21 15% among American adults with test-confirmed COVID-19, 22 19% among Canadian adults with self-reported COVID-19, 23 and 8-17% in 10 community-based UK cohorts with varying long COVID definitions. 24 The higher risk of long COVID estimated in our study following infection by the ancestral strain, and lowest risk after Omicron infection corroborates previous observations. 19 – 22 , 25 The very high vaccination uptake in our cohort of HCWs may have contributed to the lower risk after Omicron infections. Whereas some previous studies have reported lower long COVID risk with repeat infection, 26 , 27 our study indicates that long COVID risk is roughly two thirds lower following reinfection compared to first infection. This may be partly related to greater host-specific resistance among individuals who did not have long COVID following their first episode. The cumulative risk of long COVID during the study period increased with the number of infections, a trend also observed elsewhere. 23 , 26 Even if the per episode risk is highest with first infection, the higher cumulative risk for individuals with repeated infections reflects ongoing accumulation of the persisting risk with reinfections. The prevalence of long COVID depends upon the level of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, its associated long COVID risk, the duration of long COVID condition and the duration of follow-up. At the time of our May 2023 survey, 5.6% of telephone participants and 11.0% of online participants reported symptoms consistent with long COVID. Despite the smaller telephone survey sample, their prevalence likely better represents the true HCW population estimate given the higher response rate and representativeness. A nationwide Canadian survey estimated that 7% of Canadian adults had long COVID in 2022. 23 According to the U.S. National Health Interview Survey of 2022, 6.9% of American adults ever had long COVID, 3.4% in 2022, 28 while the Household Pulse Survey found that 17.6% ever had long COVID, 6.9% in 2024. 1 In the UK, 3% of the population was estimated to have long COVID in March 2023. 28 In the absence of diagnostic biomarkers, long COVID ascertainment is based on non-specific signs or symptoms. 29 The most prevalent symptoms in our study were fatigue, shortness of breath, neurocognitive symptoms and PEM, arranged within systemic, neurocognitive and respiratory clusters, which aligns with other population-based and clinical studies. 1 , 7 , 9 , 30 – 36 Previous studies comparing symptoms (of any severity) reported by COVID-19 infected and uninfected participants found a high prevalence of core long COVID symptoms also among uninfected individuals. 8 , 36 – 39 Prevalence ratios comparing infected vs. uninfected participants were relatively low (at 0.8 to 3) even for more specific symptoms like smell/taste disturbance. When we compared prevalent long COVID cases and COVID controls, PRs were high at 2-5 for symptoms of any severity and much higher for severe or multiple (≥5) symptoms. This suggests that future studies assessing risk factors of long COVID may benefit from using both the current sensitive but less specific, as well as more specific but less sensitive case-definitions, the latter requiring several symptoms and/or a moderate-severe experience. If one uses the “standard” case definition, it seems important to not only document the symptoms but also to annotate those specifically attributed by patients to a COVID-19 episode. Long COVID patients report fatigue, shortness of breath and cognitive symptoms as the most debilitating symptoms. 9 We found that cases overall were 2-3 times, and severe cases 4-10 times, more likely than controls to report dyspnea-associated and cognitive impairments overall. Post-COVID-19 limitations in physical performance effort have been described after hospitalized and ambulatory COVID-19 episodes. 40 – 42 Among patients from long COVID clinics, 36% and 40%, respectively, reported moderate and severe exercise limitations compared to their pre-COVID-19 performance, indicating drastic decrease in the frequency of moderate or intense physical activity. 43 , 44 Cognitive impairments associated with long COVID have been described elsewhere, but their association with long COVID severity has not been previously documented. 33 , 43 , 45 Strengths and limitations Our large and systematic HCW-based study expands understanding of the evolving long COVID risk during the first three years of the pandemic. For the first time, we describe the complex relationships of long COVID risk and severity with SARS-CoV-2 variants, acute COVID-19 severity and first infection vs. reinfections. Moreover, we show that a survey-based classification of long COVID severity is associated with the specificity of the case-definition and with functional impact. Our main limitation was the low response rate, which likely overestimated long COVID prevalence. Nevertheless, our validation telephone sub-study with a higher response rate from a representative sample of the target population found similar results for long COVID risk after first infection vs. reinfection, as well as cumulative risk with number of infections, reassuring that other associations assessed through online participants were likely not biased. The retrospective observational design might have led to some recall bias, potentially affecting precision for the number and exact timing of COVID-19 episodes, duration of symptoms (based on infection date) and identification of recovered long COVID cases (based on symptom start and end dates). Our study sample consisted mostly of middle-aged white female HCWs, reflective of the healthcare workforce in Quebec, which may limit generalizability to other populations. Conclusion Long COVID is a common and disabling condition among HCWs. Societal and healthcare burden remains important and will continue to accrue given ongoing SARS-CoV-2 transmission and long COVID risk with reinfections. Funding This work was supported by the Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux du Québec. This work was also supported by the Fonds de recherche du Québec (FRQ) through the Research Centre grant. Role of the Funder The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Conflict of interest disclosures SC, MO and IZD report funding from the Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux du Québec to conduct this work, paid to their institution. SC reports funding from the Public Health Agency of Canada for unrelated work, paid to her institution. ELF reports grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research unrelated to this work and paid to his institution. Her site participated in an interventional trial conducted by Laurent Pharma. CAM is copresident of the Association Québécoise de l’encéphalomyélite myalgique”. DMS reports grants from the Public Health Agency of Canada, the Pacific Public Health Foundation, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research for unrelated work, paid to her institution. GD reports having participated as medical advisor on the provincial Public Health scientific committee on COVID-19 for Quebec Ministry of Health and Social Services. AP reports grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research unrelated to this work and paid to his institution. Other authors have no conflict of interest to declare. Data Availability Underlying data cannot be shared publicly by authors, because it belongs to the Ministere de la sante et des services sociaux du Quebec and data access to researchers was given under the legal mandate of the Quebec National Director of Public Health. A request for data should be addressed to the research access centre designated by Quebec Government in accordance with the act respecting health and social services information ( https://statistique.quebec.ca/en/institut/services-for-researchers/data ). View this table: View inline View popup Table 1. Characteristics of the study population View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 2. Risk and prevalence of long COVID by type of survey and type of recruitment View this table: View inline View popup Table 3. Disease severity, self-rated health and physical and cognitive impairment during daily activities Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Cumulative long COVID risk by total number of COVID-19 episodes and long COVID risk with initial and subsequent COVID-19 infections by variant and severity of the acute COVID-19 episode Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Prevalence ratios of symptoms, by presence and severity, and of number of symptoms comparing long COVID cases and COVID controls Acknowledgments We thank Stéphanie Grenier, Josiane Rivard and Sandrine Hegg-Deloye (CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center) for their work preparing and administering the online and telephone surveys, Meghan Kanou (Montreal University) for her contribution in the literature review, Maria Tran (Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec) for her contribution with some statistical analyses. Finally, we thank all the participants enrolled in the Quebec healthcare worker cohort. REFERENCES 1. ↵ National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine . A Long COVID Definition: A Chronic, Systemic Disease State with Profound Consequences .; 2024 . doi: 10.17226/27768 OpenUrl CrossRef 2. ↵ Davis HE , McCorkell L , Vogel JM , Topol EJ . Long COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations . Nat Rev Microbiol . 2023 ; 21 ( 3 ): 133 – 146 . doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00846-2 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ Al-Aly Z , Davis H , McCorkell L , et al. Long COVID science, research and policy . Nat Med. 2024 ; 30 ( 8 ): 2148 – 2164 . doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03173-6 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 4. ↵ Bull-Otterson L , Baca S , Saydah S , et al. Post–COVID Conditions Among Adult COVID-19 Survivors Aged 18–64 and ≥65 Years — United States, March 2020–November 2021 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2022 ; 71 ( 21 ): 713 – 717 . doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7121e1 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 5. ↵ Ceban F , Ling S , Lui LMW , et al. Fatigue and cognitive impairment in Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis . Brain Behav Immun . 2022 ; 101 : 93 – 135 . doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.12.020 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 6. ↵ Bowe B , Xie Y , Al-Aly Z . Acute and postacute sequelae associated with SARS-CoV-2 reinfection . Nat Med . 2022 ; 28 ( 11 ): 2398 – 2405 . doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02051-3 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 7. ↵ World Health Organization . A Clinical Case Definition of Post COVID-19 Condition by a Delphi Consensus . WHO ; 2021 : 20 . Accessed November 1, 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Post_COVID-19_condition-Clinical_case_definition-2021.1 8. ↵ Archambault PM , Rosychuk RJ , Audet M , et al. Post-COVID-19 condition symptoms among emergency department patients tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection . Nat Commun . 2024 ; 15 ( 1 ): 8449 . doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52404-4 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 9. ↵ Davis HE , Assaf GS , McCorkell L , et al. Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact . eClinicalMedicine . 2021 ; 38 : 101019 . doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101019 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 10. Dempsey B , Madan I , Stevelink SAM , Lamb D . Long COVID among healthcare workers: a narrative review of definitions, prevalence, symptoms, risk factors and impacts . Br Med Bull . 2024 ; 151 ( 1 ): 16 – 35 . doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldae008 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 11. Wong AW , Tran KC , Binka M , et al. Use of latent class analysis and patient reported outcome measures to identify distinct long COVID phenotypes: A longitudinal cohort study . PLoS One . 2023 ; 18 ( 6 ): e0286588 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286588 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 12. ↵ Nayani S , Castanares-Zapatero D , De Pauw R , et al. Classification of post COVID-19 condition symptoms: a longitudinal study in the Belgian population . BMJ Open . 2023 ; 13 ( 10 ): e072726 . doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072726 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 13. ↵ Sørensen AIV , Spiliopoulos L , Bager P , et al. A nationwide questionnaire study of post-acute symptoms and health problems after SARS-CoV-2 infection in Denmark . Nat Commun . 2022 ; 13 ( 1 ): 4213 . doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31897-x OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 14. ↵ Simard M , Sirois C , Candas B . Validation of the Combined Comorbidity Index of Charlson and Elixhauser to Predict 30-Day Mortality Across ICD-9 and ICD-10 . Med Care . 2018 ; 56 ( 5 ): 441 – 447 . doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000905 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 15. ↵ MRC Dyspnoea Scale | Primary Care Respiratory Society . Accessed February 28, 2024. https://www.pcrs-uk.org/mrc-dyspnoea-scale 16. ↵ Institut national de santé publique du Québec . Données sur les variants du SRAS-CoV-2 au Québec . October 2024. Accessed October 9, 2024. https://www.inspq.qc.ca/covid-19/donnees/variants 17. ↵ Hastie T , Tibshirani R , Friedman J. Hierarchical clustering. In: The Elements of Statistical Learning. 2nd ed. Springer ; 2009 : 520 – 528 . 18. ↵ Al-Aly Z , Bowe B , Xie Y . Long COVID after breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection . Nat Med . 2022 ; 28 ( 7 ): 1461 – 1467 . doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01840-0 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 19. ↵ Antonelli M , Pujol JC , Spector TD , Ourselin S , Steves CJ . Risk of long COVID associated with delta versus omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2 . Lancet . 2022 ; 399 ( 10343 ): 2263 – 2264 . doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00941-2 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 20. ↵ Ballouz T , Menges D , Kaufmann M , et al. Post COVID-19 condition after Wildtype, Delta, and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection and prior vaccination: Pooled analysis of two population-based cohorts . PLoS One . 2023 ; 18 ( 2 ): e0281429 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281429 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 21. ↵ Oelsner EC , Sun Y , Balte PP , et al. Epidemiologic Features of Recovery From SARS-CoV-2 Infection . JAMA Netw Open . 2024 ; 7 ( 6 ): e2417440 . doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17440 OpenUrl CrossRef 22. ↵ Perlis RH , Santillana M , Ognyanova K , et al. Prevalence and Correlates of Long COVID Symptoms Among US Adults . JAMA Netw Open . 2022 ; 5 ( 10 ): e2238804 . doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38804 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 23. ↵ Kuang S , Earl S , Clarke J , Zakaria D , Demers A , Aziz S . Experiences of Canadians with long-term symptoms following COVID-19 . Insights on Canadian Society. December 8 , 2023 . Accessed January 29, 2024. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/75-006-x/2023001/article/00015-eng.pdf?st=FIv9-CF5 24. ↵ Thompson EJ , Williams DM , Walker AJ , et al. Long COVID burden and risk factors in 10 UK longitudinal studies and electronic health records . Nat Commun . 2022 ; 13 ( 1 ): 3528 . doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30836-0 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 25. ↵ Canas LS , Molteni E , Deng J , et al. Profiling post-COVID-19 condition across different variants of SARS-CoV-2: a prospective longitudinal study in unvaccinated wild-type, unvaccinated alpha-variant, and vaccinated delta-variant populations . Lancet Digit Health . 2023 ; 5 ( 7 ): e421 – e434 . doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00056-0 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 26. ↵ Hadley E , Yoo YJ , Patel S , et al. Insights from an N3C RECOVER EHR-based cohort study characterizing SARS-CoV-2 reinfections and Long COVID . Commun Med . 2024 ; 4 ( 1 ): 129 . doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00539-2 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 27. ↵ Romero-Ibarguengoitia ME , Rodríguez-Torres JF , Garza-Silva A , et al. Association of vaccine status, reinfections, and risk factors with Long COVID syndrome . Sci Rep . 2024 ; 14 ( 1 ): 2817 . doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52925-4 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 28. ↵ Adjaye-Gbewonyo D , Vahratian A , Perrine CG , Bertolli J. Long COVID in Adults: United States , 2022 .; 2023 . Accessed March 1, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db480.pdf 29. ↵ Thomas C , Faghy MA , Chidley C , Phillips BE , Bewick T , Ashton RE . Blood Biomarkers of Long COVID: A Systematic Review . Mol Diagn Ther . 2024 ; 28 ( 5 ): 537 – 574 . doi: 10.1007/s40291-024-00731-z OpenUrl CrossRef 30. ↵ Fernandez-de-Las-Peñas C , Notarte KI , Macasaet R , et al. Persistence of post-COVID symptoms in the general population two years after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis . J Infect . 2023 : S0163 – 4453 (23)00590-X. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2023.12.004 OpenUrl CrossRef 31. Hanson SW , Abbafati C , Aerts JG , et al. Estimated Global Proportions of Individuals With Persistent Fatigue, Cognitive, and Respiratory Symptom Clusters Following Symptomatic COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021 . JAMA . 2022 ; 328 ( 16 ): 1604 – 1615 . doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18931 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 32. Lopez-Leon S , Wegman-Ostrosky T , Perelman C , et al. More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Sci Rep . 2021 ; 11 ( 1 ): 16144 . doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95565-8 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 33. ↵ Zhao S , Martin EM , Reuken PA , et al. Long COVID is associated with severe cognitive slowing: a multicentre cross-sectional study . eClinicalMedicine . 2024 ; 68 . doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102434 OpenUrl CrossRef 34. Whitaker M , Elliott J , Chadeau-Hyam M , et al. Persistent COVID-19 symptoms in a community study of 606,434 people in England . Nat Commun . 2022 ; 13 ( 1 ): 1957 . doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29521-z OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 35. Munblit D , Nicholson T , Akrami A , et al. A core outcome set for post-COVID-19 condition in adults for use in clinical practice and research: an international Delphi consensus study . Lancet Respir Med . 2022 ; 10 ( 7 ): 715 – 724 . doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00169-2 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 36. ↵ Thaweethai T , Jolley SE , Karlson EW , et al. Development of a Definition of Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection . JAMA . 2023 ; 329 ( 22 ): 1934 – 1946 . doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.8823 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 37. Ballering AV , van Zon SKR , olde Hartman TC , Rosmalen JGM. Persistence of somatic symptoms after COVID-19 in the Netherlands: an observational cohort study . Lancet . 2022 ; 400 ( 10350 ): 452 – 461 . doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01214-4 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 38. Wang D , Hu B , Hu C , et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China . JAMA . 2020 ; 323 ( 11 ): 1061 . doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 39. ↵ Subramanian A , Nirantharakumar K , Hughes S , et al. Symptoms and risk factors for long COVID in non-hospitalized adults . Nat Med . 2022 ; 28 ( 8 ): 1706 – 1714 . doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01909-w OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 40. ↵ Huang L , Li X , Gu X , et al. Health outcomes in people 2 years after surviving hospitalisation with COVID-19: a longitudinal cohort study . Lancet Respir Med . 2022 ; 10 ( 9 ): 863 – 876 . doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00126-6 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 41. Jacobson KB , Rao M , Bonilla H , et al. Patients With Uncomplicated Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Have Long-Term Persistent Symptoms and Functional Impairment Similar to Patients with Severe COVID-19: A Cautionary Tale During a Global Pandemic . Clin Infect Dis . 2021 ; 73 ( 3 ): e826 – e829 . doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab103 OpenUrl CrossRef 42. ↵ O’Brien K , Townsend L , Dowds J , et al. 1-year quality of life and health-outcomes in patients hospitalised with COVID-19: a longitudinal cohort study . Respir Res . 2022 ; 23 ( 1 ): 115 . doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02032-7 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 43. ↵ Tabacof L , Tosto-Mancuso J , Wood J , et al. Post-acute COVID-19 Syndrome Negatively Impacts Physical Function, Cognitive Function, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Participation . Am J Phys Med Rehabil . 2022 ; 101 ( 1 ): 48 – 52 . doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001910 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 44. ↵ Heightman M , Prashar J , Hillman TE , et al. Post-COVID-19 assessment in a specialist clinical service: a 12-month, single-centre, prospective study in 1325 individuals . BMJ Open Resp Res . 2021 ; 8 ( 1 ): e001041 . doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001041 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 45. ↵ Jaywant A , Gunning FM , Oberlin LE , et al. Cognitive Symptoms of Post–COVID-19 Condition and Daily Functioning . JAMA Netw Open . 2024 ; 7 ( 2 ): e2356098 . doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.56098 OpenUrl CrossRef View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted May 09, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Long COVID risk and severity after COVID-19 infections and reinfections in Quebec healthcare workers Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Long COVID risk and severity after COVID-19 infections and reinfections in Quebec healthcare workers Sara Carazo , Manale Ouakki , Nektaria Nicolakakis , Emilia Liana Falcone , Danuta M Skowronski , Marie-José Durand , Marie-France Coutu , Simon Décary , Isaora Z Dialahy , Olivia Drescher , Elisabeth Canitrot , Carrie Anna McGinn , Philippe Latouche , Robert Laforce , Clemence Dallaire , Geoffroy Denis , Alain Piché , Gaston De Serres medRxiv 2025.05.08.25327059; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.08.25327059 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Long COVID risk and severity after COVID-19 infections and reinfections in Quebec healthcare workers Sara Carazo , Manale Ouakki , Nektaria Nicolakakis , Emilia Liana Falcone , Danuta M Skowronski , Marie-José Durand , Marie-France Coutu , Simon Décary , Isaora Z Dialahy , Olivia Drescher , Elisabeth Canitrot , Carrie Anna McGinn , Philippe Latouche , Robert Laforce , Clemence Dallaire , Geoffroy Denis , Alain Piché , Gaston De Serres medRxiv 2025.05.08.25327059; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.08.25327059 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Epidemiology Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (572) Allergy and Immunology (864) Anesthesia (302) Cardiovascular Medicine (4448) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (444) Dermatology (383) Emergency Medicine (609) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1515) Epidemiology (15240) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1130) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6613) Geriatric Medicine (669) Health Economics (1000) Health Informatics (4550) Health Policy (1372) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1613) Hematology (543) HIV/AIDS (1268) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15927) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1105) Medical Education (624) Medical Ethics (147) Nephrology (668) Neurology (6621) Nursing (346) Nutrition (999) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1147) Occupational and Environmental Health (957) Oncology (3342) Ophthalmology (977) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (421) Pain Medicine (436) Palliative Medicine (130) Pathology (665) Pediatrics (1695) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (693) Primary Care Research (714) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5459) Public and Global Health (9247) Radiology and Imaging (2205) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1371) Respiratory Medicine (1197) Rheumatology (597) Sexual and Reproductive Health (715) Sports Medicine (530) Surgery (714) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (289) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a0283b815a5525c1',t:'MTc3OTkxODU5Nw=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00