Hormonal and reproductive factors and the risk of ovarian cancer

other OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-12

This case-control study examined hormone-related factors and found parity inversely associated with ovarian cancer risk, with stronger effects for Type I and borderline tumors, while oral contraceptive use reduced risk with longer duration.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-12 · read from full text

This population-based case–control study in Montreal, Canada (2011–2016) examined associations between hormone-related and reproductive factors and ovarian cancer risk overall and by tumor behavior (invasive vs borderline) and ovarian cancer type (Type I vs Type II), including 496 cases and 908 controls, using logistic and polytomous logistic regression with adjustment. Parity was inversely associated with ovarian cancer risk across tumor behavior and type, with a much stronger inverse association for Type I invasive cancers, and borderline tumors also showed a lower risk; oral contraceptive ever use was not associated overall, but longer use (≥10 years) was linked to reduced risk, particularly for invasive cancers. The strongest endometriosis-related signal was for Type I cancers, while associations for other factors were less clear. The paper’s caveat is that the observational case–control design may limit causal inference, and the authors report uncertainty across factors beyond parity and long-term oral contraceptive use. Relevance to endometriosis: the study reports that a history of endometriosis was most strongly associated with Type I ovarian cancers, though the paper’s main focus is hormone- and reproductive-factor risk for ovarian cancer by subtype.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hormone-related factors have been associated with ovarian cancer, the strongest being parity and oral contraceptive use. Given reductions in birth rates and increases in oral contraceptive use over time, associations in more recent birth cohorts may differ. Furthermore, consideration of ovarian cancer heterogeneity (i.e., Type I/II invasive cancers) may contribute to a better understanding of etiology. We examined hormone-related factors in relation to ovarian cancer risk overall, for Type I and Type II cancers, as well as borderline tumors. METHODS: A population-based case-control study was carried out in Montreal, Canada from 2011 to 2016, including 496 cases and 908 controls. For each hormone-related variable, adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using logistic regression for ovarian cancer overall, and using polytomous logistic regression for associations by tumor behavior and ovarian cancer type. RESULTS: Parity was inversely associated with risk overall and by tumor behavior and type, with a stronger OR (95% CI) for Type I [0.09 (0.04-0.24) for ≥3 full-term births vs. nulliparity] vs. Type II [0.66 (0.43-1.02)] invasive cancers; the OR (95% CI) for borderline tumors was 0.41 (0.22-0.77). Oral contraceptive ever use was not associated with risk overall, but ≥10 years of use vs. never use reduced risk, particularly for invasive cancers. A history of endometriosis was most strongly associated with Type I cancers. Associations with other factors were less clear. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that associations with some hormone-related factors may differ between borderline and invasive Type I and II ovarian cancers.
Full text 9,458 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose Hormone-related factors have been associated with ovarian cancer, the strongest being parity and oral contraceptive use. Given reductions in birth rates and increases in oral contraceptive use over time, associations in more recent birth cohorts may differ. Furthermore, consideration of ovarian cancer heterogeneity (i.e., Type I/II invasive cancers) may contribute to a better understanding of etiology. We examined hormone-related factors in relation to ovarian cancer risk overall, for Type I and Type II cancers, as well as borderline tumors.

Methods

A population-based case–control study was carried out in Montreal, Canada from 2011 to 2016, including 496 cases and 908 controls. For each hormone-related variable, adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using logistic regression for ovarian cancer overall, and using polytomous logistic regression for associations by tumor behavior and ovarian cancer type.

Results

Parity was inversely associated with risk overall and by tumor behavior and type, with a stronger OR (95% CI) for Type I [0.09 (0.04–0.24) for ≥3 full-term births vs. nulliparity] vs. Type II [0.66 (0.43–1.02)] invasive cancers; the OR (95% CI) for borderline tumors was 0.41 (0.22–0.77). Oral contraceptive ever use was not associated with risk overall, but ≥10 years of use vs. never use reduced risk, particularly for invasive cancers. A history of endometriosis was most strongly associated with Type I cancers. Associations with other factors were less clear.

Conclusions

These results suggest that associations with some hormone-related factors may differ between borderline and invasive Type I and II ovarian cancers. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM (2010) Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 127:2893–2917 Buys SS, Partridge E, Black A et al (2011) Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening randomized controlled trial. JAMA 305:2295–2303 Schuler S, Ponnath M, Engel J, Ortmann O (2013) Ovarian epithelial tumors and reproductive factors: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287:1187–1204 Milan A (2013) Fertility: overview, 2009 to 2011. Statistics, Canada Dawson DA (1990) Trends in use of oral contraceptives–data from the 1987 National Health Interview Survey. Fam Plann Perspect 22:169–172 International Agency for Research on Cancer (1999) IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: hormonal contraception and post-menopausal hormonal therapy. World Health Organization, Lyon, France Kurman RJ, Shih Ie M (2010) The origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposed unifying theory. Am J Surg Pathol 34:433–443 Schildkraut JM (2001) Ovary. In: Franco EL, Rohan TE (eds) Cancer precursors: epidemiology, detection, and prevention. Springer, New York, pp 304–320 Jones MB (2006) Borderline ovarian tumors: current concepts for prognostic factors and clinical management. Clin Obstet Gynecol 49:517–525 Wentzensen N, Poole EM, Trabert B et al. (2016) Ovarian cancer risk factors by histologic subtype: an analysis from the ovarian cancer cohort consortium. J. Clin. Oncol Collaborative Group on Epidemiological Studies of Ovarian Cancer, Beral V, Doll R, Hermon C, Peto R, Reeves G (2008) Ovarian cancer and oral contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of data from 45 epidemiological studies including 23,257 women with ovarian cancer and 87,303 controls. Lancet. 371: 303–314 Yang HP, Trabert B, Murphy MA et al (2012) Ovarian cancer risk factors by histologic subtypes in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Int J Cancer 131:938–948 Merritt MA, De Pari M, Vitonis AF, Titus LJ, Cramer DW, Terry KL (2013) Reproductive characteristics in relation to ovarian cancer risk by histologic pathways. Hum Reprod 28:1406–1417 Gates MA, Rosner BA, Hecht JL, Tworoger SS (2010) Risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer by histologic subtype. Am J Epidemiol 171:45–53 Glynn RJ, Rosner B (2004) Methods to evaluate risks for composite end points and their individual components. J Clin Epidemiol 57:113–122 Fortner RT, Ose J, Merritt MA et al. (2015) Reproductive and hormone-related risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer by histologic pathways, invasiveness and histologic subtypes: results from the EPIC cohort. Int J Cancer Poole EM, Merritt MA, Jordan SJ et al (2013) Hormonal and reproductive risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer by tumor aggressiveness. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 22:429–437 Liao PV, Dollin J (2012) Half a century of the oral contraceptive pill: historical review and view to the future. Can Fam Physician 58:e757–e760 Kumle M, Weiderpass E, Braaten T et al (2004) Risk for invasive and borderline epithelial ovarian neoplasias following use of hormonal contraceptives: the Norwegian-Swedish Women’s Lifestyle and Health Cohort Study. Br J Cancer 90:1386–1391 Risch HA, Marrett LD, Jain M, Howe GR (1996) Differences in risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer by histologic type. Results of a case-control study. Am J Epidemiol 144:363–372 Riman T, Dickman PW, Nilsson S et al (2001) Risk factors for epithelial borderline ovarian tumors: results of a Swedish case-control study. Gynecol Oncol 83:575–585 Tworoger SS, Fairfield KM, Colditz GA, Rosner BA, Hankinson SE (2007) Association of oral contraceptive use, other contraceptive methods, and infertility with ovarian cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 166:894–901 Rice MS, Murphy MA, Tworoger SS (2012) Tubal ligation, hysterectomy and ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis. J Ovarian Res 5:13 Cibula D, Widschwendter M, Majek O, Dusek L (2011) Tubal ligation and the risk of ovarian cancer: review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 17:55–67 Sieh W, Salvador S, McGuire V et al (2013) Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer subtypes: a pooled analysis of case-control studies. Int J Epidemiol 42:579–589 Gaitskell K, Green J, Pirie K, Reeves G, Beral V, Million Women Study C (2016) Tubal ligation and ovarian cancer risk in a large cohort: Substantial variation by histological type. Int J Cancer 138:1076–1084 Fathalla MF (1971) Incessant ovulation–a factor in ovarian neoplasia? The Lancet 2:163 Cramer DW, Welch WR (1983) Determinants of ovarian cancer risk. II. Inferences regarding pathogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst 71:717–721 Adami HO, Hsieh CC, Lambe M et al (1994) Parity, age at first childbirth, and risk of ovarian cancer. The Lancet 344:1250–1254 Ness RB, Cottreau C (1999) Possible role of ovarian epithelial inflammation in ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1459–1467 Kurman RJ, Shih Ie M (2016) The dualistic model of ovarian carcinogenesis: revisited, revised, and expanded. Am J Pathol 186:733–747 Pearce CL, Templeman C, Rossing MA et al (2012) Association between endometriosis and risk of histological subtypes of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of case-control studies. Lancet Oncol 13:385–394 Kim HS, Kim TH, Chung HH, Song YS (2014) Risk and prognosis of ovarian cancer in women with endometriosis: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 110:1878–1890 Ness RB (2003) Endometriosis and ovarian cancer: thoughts on shared pathophysiology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:280–294 Shu XO, Brinton LA, Gao YT, Yuan JM (1989) Population-based case-control study of ovarian cancer in Shanghai. Cancer Res 49:3670–3674 Parazzini F, Moroni S, La Vecchia C, Negri E, dal Pino D, Bolis G (1997) Ovarian cancer risk and history of selected medical conditions linked with female hormones. Eur J Cancer 33:1634–1637 Brinton LA, Sakoda LC, Sherman ME et al (2005) Relationship of benign gynecologic diseases to subsequent risk of ovarian and uterine tumors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:2929–2935 Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL (2008) Modern Epidemiology, 3rd edn. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia Hernan MA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Robins JM (2004) A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology 15:615–625 Acknowledgments This research was supported by the Canadian Cancer Society (Grant #700485) and the Cancer Research Society, the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé, and the Ministère de l’Économie de la Science et de l’Innovation du Québec GRePEC program (Grant #16264). Dr. Koushik was supported by the Cancer Research Society-Cancer Guzzo Université de Montréal Award, the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé Research Scholar Program, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research New Investigator program. Dr. Abrahamowicz is a James McGill Professor at McGill University. Dr. Siemiatycki holds the Guzzo-Cancer Research Society Chair in Environment and Cancer. The CRCHUM and the MUHC Research Institute receive support from the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé. We are grateful to our interviewers Claire Walker, Françoise Pineault, and Martine Le Comte, and to Ana Gueorguieva for data management. We also thank our additional clinical collaborators Drs. Suzanne Fortin, Dominique Tremblay and Michel Welt. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Koushik, A., Grundy, A., Abrahamowicz, M. et al. Hormonal and reproductive factors and the risk of ovarian cancer. Cancer Causes Control 28, 393–403 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-016-0848-9 Received: Accepted: Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-016-0848-9

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Contraceptives, Oral Ovarian Neoplasms Parity Reproductive History Adolescent Adult Aged Canada Case-Control Studies Child Contraceptives, Oral Female Humans Middle Aged Ovarian Neoplasms Ovarian Neoplasms Pregnancy Prevalence Risk Factors Young Adult

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-18T06:15:08.409253+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:20:37.704673+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine