Hypoglossal motor output is altered by C4 epidural electrical stimulation via ascending spinal and peripheral feedback pathways

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT After cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI), swallowing dysfunction is common and increases mortality via aspiration pneumonia. While these deficits have often been attributed to secondary damage from complications of injury management, there has recently been a greater appreciation for the modulatory role of spinal populations in swallow generation that are disrupted by injury. Here, we illustrate in a rodent model of cSCI that epidural spinal stimulation (ESS) of the phrenic motor nucleus at spinal segment C4 alters motor output at the hypoglossal motor nucleus through activation of excitatory ascending spinal pathways and inhibitory peripheral sensory feedback mechanisms. These findings highlight the importance of spinal-brainstem communication in shaping the motor program of swallow-related musculature and offer the potential for stimulation of the cervical spinal cord to be a therapeutic target for restoring swallowing function after injury. NEW & NOTEWORTHY In two varying severity models of spinal cord injury, we demonstrate the effects of spinal cord stimulation at C4 on the distal hypoglossal motor nucleus. We show that despite being anatomically distant, electrical stimulation of the phrenic motor nucleus increases hypoglossal motor output through ascending spinal pathways and dampens it through peripheral pathways. These findings highlight the importance of spinal-brainstem communication and illustrate the ability of spinal stimulation to restore this communication after injury.
Full text 1,597 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT After cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI), swallowing dysfunction is common and increases mortality via aspiration pneumonia. While these deficits have often been attributed to secondary damage from complications of injury management, there has recently been a greater appreciation for the modulatory role of spinal populations in swallow generation that are disrupted by injury. Here, we illustrate in a rodent model of cSCI that epidural spinal stimulation (ESS) of the phrenic motor nucleus at spinal segment C4 alters motor output at the hypoglossal motor nucleus through activation of excitatory ascending spinal pathways and inhibitory peripheral sensory feedback mechanisms. These findings highlight the importance of spinal-brainstem communication in shaping the motor program of swallow-related musculature and offer the potential for stimulation of the cervical spinal cord to be a therapeutic target for restoring swallowing function after injury. NEW & NOTEWORTHY In two varying severity models of spinal cord injury, we demonstrate the effects of spinal cord stimulation at C4 on the distal hypoglossal motor nucleus. We show that despite being anatomically distant, electrical stimulation of the phrenic motor nucleus increases hypoglossal motor output through ascending spinal pathways and dampens it through peripheral pathways. These findings highlight the importance of spinal-brainstem communication and illustrate the ability of spinal stimulation to restore this communication after injury. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00