Classifying Domains, Benchmarking GPT-4, A Portuguese Dataset for Medical AI Q&A

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), has demonstrated remarkable capabilities in addressing complex tasks, including professional-level medical question answering. While standardized benchmarks like the USMLE have been widely used for evaluating LLM performance in English, there is a significant gap in evaluating these models in other languages, such as Portuguese. To address this, we present a curated dataset derived from the Teste de Progresso (TP), a widely adopted Brazilian progress test used to assess medical knowledge across six key domains: Basic Sciences, Internal Medicine, Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, and Pediatrics. The dataset consists of 720 multiple-choice questions spanning five years (2019–2023). We demonstrate two primary applications of this dataset. First, we benchmark the performance of GPT-4, which achieved an overall accuracy of 90% across the six medical domains, with the highest performance in Internal Medicine (10%) and the lowest in Public Health (80%). Second, we develop a classification model based on BERTimbau, achieving an overall accuracy of 94% in categorizing questions into their respective medical domains. Our results highlight the utility of the dataset for both benchmarking AI models and automating medical question classification. This work emphasizes the importance of creating domain-specific datasets in underrepresented languages, like Portuguese, to advance AI-driven medical applications, ensure equitable access to AI technologies, and address linguistic and cultural gaps in healthcare education.
Full text 1,704 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), has demonstrated remarkable capabilities in addressing complex tasks, including professional-level medical question answering. While standardized benchmarks like the USMLE have been widely used for evaluating LLM performance in English, there is a significant gap in evaluating these models in other languages, such as Portuguese. To address this, we present a curated dataset derived from the Teste de Progresso (TP), a widely adopted Brazilian progress test used to assess medical knowledge across six key domains: Basic Sciences, Internal Medicine, Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, and Pediatrics. The dataset consists of 720 multiple-choice questions spanning five years (2019–2023). We demonstrate two primary applications of this dataset. First, we benchmark the performance of GPT-4, which achieved an overall accuracy of 90% across the six medical domains, with the highest performance in Internal Medicine (10%) and the lowest in Public Health (80%). Second, we develop a classification model based on BERTimbau, achieving an overall accuracy of 94% in categorizing questions into their respective medical domains. Our results highlight the utility of the dataset for both benchmarking AI models and automating medical question classification. This work emphasizes the importance of creating domain-specific datasets in underrepresented languages, like Portuguese, to advance AI-driven medical applications, ensure equitable access to AI technologies, and address linguistic and cultural gaps in healthcare education. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00