Ethics of Digital Contact Tracing and COVID-19: Who Is (Not) Free to Go?
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Digital tracing technologies are heralded as an effective way of containing
SARS-CoV-2 faster than it is spreading, thereby allowing the possibility of easing draconic
measures of population-wide quarantine. But existing technological proposals risk addressing the
wrong problem. The objective is not solely to maximise the ratio of people freed from quarantine
but to also ensure that the composition of the freed group is fair. We identify several factors
that pose a risk for fair group composition along with an analysis of general lessons for a
philosophy of technology. Policymakers, epidemiologists, and developers can use these risk
factors to benchmark proposal technologies, curb the pandemic, and keep public
trust.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00