Use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for ovarian preservation in patients receiving cyclophosphamide for systemic lupus erythematosus: A meta-analysis

Komal Ejaz, Dania Abid, Paul Juneau, Jun Chu, Sarfaraz Hasni
In: Lupus · 2022 · vol. 31(14) , pp. 1706–1713 · doi:10.1177/09612033221128740 · PMID:36148853 · W4296806515
review OA: green CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cyclophosphamide (CYC) has known cytotoxic effects on ovarian reserve and has been linked to premature ovarian failure (POF) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The concurrent use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHas) is postulated to preserve ovarian function by reducing the number of follicles exposed to CYC, but there is paucity of data to establish its efficacy. We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the effect of concurrent GnRHa use in persevering ovarian function and pregnancy. METHODS: English language databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched to include studies published between 2000 and 2021. Studies in females with rheumatic diseases receiving concurrent GnRHa and CYC therapy to evaluate ovarian preservation as defined by amenorrhea, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), or estradiol levels or successful pregnancy were included. We used a fixed effect, exact, Mantel-Haenszel approach to estimate the overall odds ratio (OR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: Seven studies with 218 female patients were included. The ovarian function was preserved in 125/132 (94.6%) of women who received GnRHa concurrently with CYC compared to 50/86 (58%) of women who did not receive GnRHa (OR = 10.3, CI = 4.83-36.29). The OR for pregnancy with GnRHa use = 2.94 (CI = 1.04-9.89). CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up studies are needed to establish the efficacy and safety of GnRHa use for ovarian preservation.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (41)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-13T19:23:37.050295+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK