A discussion of a rationality and continuity related to Theta Functions by using the summation of Poisson

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

The paper discusses a special mathematical function related to theta functions, starting from a formula by Poisson to construct a representation of the function and then presenting a new approximation of this case. It further examines the implications of the function producing only irrational outputs, and then uses the definition of continuity of real functions to argue for continuity while addressing “contradictions” in the discussion. The main limitation explicitly stated is that the work is a preprint and not peer reviewed by a journal. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Mathematical philosophy is built by defining logical concepts such as the concept of infinity and the concept of continuity. Hence, mathematicians are not those who can calculate, but those who can understand the mathematical concepts and can develop them in order to make new mathematical findings or to transform an hypothesis into a philosophical truth. However, mathematicians are also alarmed scientists who can verify doubted formulas by disproving a mathematical proof or finding a counterexample. It is therefore false to think that mathematicians can’t surprise nowadays with new findings. This is a mathematical demonstration and discussion concerning a special case of functions related to Theta Functions and it is a logical opportunity for those who study the summation of Poisson. This work starts by using a formula of Poisson in order to make a mathematical representation for the studied function then a new approximation of this case of functions is demonstrated. Furthermore, we discuss the consequences if this studied function gives only irrationals as outputs then we use the definition of the continuity of real functions in order to make a demonstration for the continuity of the same Function. Finally, the lovers of mathematics are invited to understand the demonstrations of this article and the discussions of the continuity contradictions in order to develop new findings related to Theta Functions and the summation of Poisson
Full text 12,174 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
A discussion of a rationality and continuity related to Theta Functions by using the summation of Poisson | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article A discussion of a rationality and continuity related to Theta Functions by using the summation of Poisson Akram Louiz This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2378274/v4 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 4 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Show more versions Abstract Mathematical philosophy is built by defining logical concepts such as the concept of infinity and the concept of continuity. Hence, mathematicians are not those who can calculate, but those who can understand the mathematical concepts and can develop them in order to make new mathematical findings or to transform an hypothesis into a philosophical truth. However, mathematicians are also alarmed scientists who can verify doubted formulas by disproving a mathematical proof or finding a counterexample. It is therefore false to think that mathematicians can’t surprise nowadays with new findings. This is a mathematical demonstration and discussion concerning a special case of functions related to Theta Functions and it is a logical opportunity for those who study the summation of Poisson. This work starts by using a formula of Poisson in order to make a mathematical representation for the studied function then a new approximation of this case of functions is demonstrated. Furthermore, we discuss the consequences if this studied function gives only irrationals as outputs then we use the definition of the continuity of real functions in order to make a demonstration for the continuity of the same Function. Finally, the lovers of mathematics are invited to understand the demonstrations of this article and the discussions of the continuity contradictions in order to develop new findings related to Theta Functions and the summation of Poisson Series summation Poisson Theta function rational irrational limit logic approximation calculus analysis Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 4 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Show more versions Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-2378274","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":184133796,"identity":"45b9a312-b066-4aa9-a389-f9341f61a7a3","order_by":0,"name":"Akram Louiz","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Applied Sciences Landshut","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Akram","middleName":"","lastName":"Louiz","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2022-12-14 14:15:40","currentVersionCode":4,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2378274/v4","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2378274/v4","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":49886986,"identity":"0f7dfcd2-f344-4d33-bb88-3504ea3592b3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-01-19 18:19:54","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":219249,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ThetaPoissoncontinuity.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2378274/v4_covered_300894e5-27c4-441d-8899-ca606e827c68.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eA discussion of a rationality and continuity related to Theta Functions by using the summation of Poisson\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Series, summation, Poisson, Theta function, rational, irrational, limit, logic, approximation, calculus, analysis","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2378274/v4","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2378274/v4","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eMathematical philosophy is built by defining logical concepts such as the concept of infinity and the concept of continuity. Hence, mathematicians are not those who can calculate, but those who can understand the mathematical concepts and can develop them in order to make new mathematical findings or to transform an hypothesis into a philosophical truth. However, mathematicians are also alarmed scientists who can verify doubted formulas by disproving a mathematical proof or finding a counterexample. It is therefore false to think that mathematicians can’t surprise nowadays with new findings. This is a mathematical demonstration and discussion concerning a special case of functions related to Theta Functions and it is a logical opportunity for those who study the summation of Poisson. This work starts by using a formula of Poisson in order to make a mathematical representation for the studied function then a new approximation of this case of functions is demonstrated. Furthermore, we discuss the consequences if this studied function gives only irrationals as outputs then we use the definition of the continuity of real functions in order to make a demonstration for the continuity of the same Function. Finally, the lovers of mathematics are invited to understand the demonstrations of this article and the discussions of the continuity contradictions in order to develop new findings related to Theta Functions and the summation of Poisson\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"A discussion of a rationality and continuity related to Theta Functions by using the summation of Poisson","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":4,"date":"2024-01-19 18:03:46","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2378274/v4","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}},{"code":3,"date":"2023-03-16 18:27:40","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2378274/v3","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}},{"code":2,"date":"2023-01-05 18:08:47","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2378274/v2","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}},{"code":1,"date":"2022-12-22 02:59:08","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2378274/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"0d4cd970-5968-46f6-9bba-bd9412bd7ed6","owner":[],"postedDate":"January 19th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2022-12-22T02:59:10+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-01-19 18:03:46","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v4","identity":"rs-2378274","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-2378274","identity":"rs-2378274","version":["v4"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00