Employing Bayesian Analysis to Establish a Cut-off Point and Assess Stigma Prevalence in Substance Use Disorder: A Comprehensive Study of the Chinese Version of the Substance Use Stigma Mechanism Scale
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Purpose: Due to the lack of reliable stigma assessment tools and the stigma faced by people with substance use disorders (SUDs), especially in China. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the Chinese version of the Substance Use Stigma Mechanism Scale (SU-SMS-C) and set its cut-off point. Methods: We recruited 1005 individuals with SUDs from Chinese rehabilitation centers. These participants completed a battery of questionnaires that included the SU-SMS-C, MSPSS, CES-D, GSES, and PDD. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess the construct validity of the scale. Additionally, the Naive Bayes Classifier was used to establish the cut-off point for the SU-SMS-C. We additionally explored the correlation between patient demographic characteristics and stigma. Results: A confirmatory factor analysis was utilized, revealing a second-order five-factor model. Based on the Naive Bayes Classifier, the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUCROC) of 0.746, the cut-off point for the SU-SMS-C was established at 44.5. The prevalence of stigma observed in the study population was 49.05%. Significant disparities were observed in the distribution of stigma across genders, with males experiencing more pronounced stigma than females. Moreover, patients consuming different primary substances reported diverse levels of stigma. Notably, those primarily using heroin endured a higher degree of stigma than users of other substances. Conclusion: The study is the first to identify a cut-off point for the SU-SMS-C by Naive Bayes Classifier, bridging a major gap in stigma measurement research. SU-SMS-C may help treat and manage SUDs by reducing stigma.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00