Feathered Icons: Drivers of Global Attention on Bird Species

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Global biodiversity faces profound threats. Efforts to slow biodiversity loss remain inadequate without greater public engagement. With challenges in the biases of species knowledge across taxa and regions, many endemic or threatened species receive insufficient attention. Birds, with their ecological importance and cultural visibility, present an ideal object for exploring biases in species knowledge. To understand factors driving scientific and public interest in birds, we compiled a comprehensive dataset to investigate how phenotypic, ecological, and cultural factors influence attention toward global bird species. Our analysis reveals that factors related to public familiarity and species charisma significantly shape public and scientific priorities. In contrast species that are threatened or have limited ranges often receive little public attention. IUCN status alone fails to sustain public interest in these species. To address this imbalance, we propose comprehensive strategies such as media campaigns and conservation education to better engage the public and scientific communities. These efforts are crucial for ensuring conservation efforts could encompass a sufficient range of species.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00