Evaluating Mycorrhizal association of Funneliformis mosseae and Glomus macrocarpum with Solanum melongena L.(brinjal) using proteomics and system biology approaches

2025 · doi:10.1101/2025.03.17.643673
preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) symbiotically associate with plant roots and enhance the uptake of inorganic nutrients, increase the ability to withstand the biotic and abiotic stresses. The interaction between plants and microbes can be studied using proteomic. The proteomic profile of an organism can be used to determine the subcellular localization, different chemical environments, potential interaction partners etc. The study was carried out to explore the comparative proteomics of Solanum melongena upon association with Glomus macrocarpum and Funneliformis mosseae . The study revealed that in comparison to the untreated control, mycorrhizal fungi, G.macrocarpum and F. mosseae led to upregulation of 43 and 31 proteins respectively. Of these proteins, 26 proteins were common in both the species while 17 were specific to G. macrocarpum and 5 were specific to F. mosseae. These proteins were predicted to be involved in major physiologically important pathways.
Full text 1,063 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) symbiotically associate with plant roots and enhance the uptake of inorganic nutrients, increase the ability to withstand the biotic and abiotic stresses. The interaction between plants and microbes can be studied using proteomic. The proteomic profile of an organism can be used to determine the subcellular localization, different chemical environments, potential interaction partners etc. The study was carried out to explore the comparative proteomics of Solanum melongena upon association with Glomus macrocarpum and Funneliformis mosseae. The study revealed that in comparison to the untreated control, mycorrhizal fungi, G.macrocarpum and F. mosseae led to upregulation of 43 and 31 proteins respectively. Of these proteins, 26 proteins were common in both the species while 17 were specific to G. macrocarpum and 5 were specific to F. mosseae. These proteins were predicted to be involved in major physiologically important pathways. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00