No place for phylogeny in structuring a sandy coastal plain community

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,858 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Although inference of assembly processes from phylogenetic patterns has become ubiquitous in community ecology, surprisingly few studies simultaneously test assumptions of such an approach and integrate over spatial scales and plant life stages. Here we investigate the roles of phylogeny, functional traits, and abiotic conditions in the spatial structuring of a sandy coastal plain community using data on 2800 finely mapped adult individuals and on the survival time-series of 500 seedlings. We demonstrate that phylogeny is a poor predictor of functional traits and that convergence in these traits is pervasive. In general, the community is not phylogenetically or functionally structured regardless of spatial scale. Leaf area, however, is strongly overdispersed across all spatial scales, which is generally taken as evidence of competition. We also show that seedling survival is dramatically increased when shaded by an adult, suggesting that seedlings are being facilitated. We also demonstrate species-specific effects on seedling survival that are independent of phylogeny. Overall, we show that phylogeny has very limited influence on the fine-scale assembly of that community, and that its role should always be tested instead of assumed. https://doi.org/10.32942/X28D07 Biodiversity, Biology, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences Published: 2024-04-03 21:29 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00