Incorporating population genomic perspectives into kelp conservation and aquaculture in the Pacific Northwest

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Recent kelp forest declines and growth in the kelp aquaculture industry have fueled increasing interest in ecological and evolutionary research on kelp forests, including kelp population genomics. While many kelp management activities have inherent genetic and evolutionary implications, kelp management in the Pacific Northwest (PNW) of North America has to date made only limited use of species-specific population genetic knowledge. We believe that kelp managers in the PNW are well positioned to begin routinely incorporating population genomic perspectives into their work. Here, we review the state of genetic knowledge in the canopy-forming kelps Nereocystis and Macrocystis from Washington to Alaska and highlight how this knowledge can support four key kelp management activities: restoration, aquaculture, wild harvest, and biobanking. We discuss several potential paradigms for geographic transfer of genetic material, consider the likely impacts of inbreeding and genetic drift in management of small kelp populations, and suggest strategies for protecting the genetic integrity of populations during wild harvest. To inform optimal sourcing strategies for biobanking and outplanting, we also reanalyze genomic data to explore how the number of individuals sampled impacts retention of genetic diversity. In many cases, predictions derived from molecular data and models have accumulated faster than the research community’s ability to validate them in the field. We propose that experimental tests be incorporated into ongoing kelp management operations as an immediate step in transitioning toward a management framework informed by population genomic data and perspectives. Adopting such a framework will improve the likelihood of attaining desirable outcomes in kelp conservation and aquaculture, including as kelp populations adapt to future challenges.
Full text 2,888 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Recent kelp forest declines and growth in the kelp aquaculture industry have fueled increasing interest in ecological and evolutionary research on kelp forests, including kelp population genomics. While many kelp management activities have inherent genetic and evolutionary implications, kelp management in the Pacific Northwest (PNW) of North America has to date made only limited use of species-specific population genetic knowledge. We believe that kelp managers in the PNW are well positioned to begin routinely incorporating population genomic perspectives into their work. Here, we review the state of genetic knowledge in the canopy-forming kelps Nereocystis and Macrocystis from Washington to Alaska and highlight how this knowledge can support four key kelp management activities: restoration, aquaculture, wild harvest, and biobanking. We discuss several potential paradigms for geographic transfer of genetic material, consider the likely impacts of inbreeding and genetic drift in management of small kelp populations, and suggest strategies for protecting the genetic integrity of populations during wild harvest. To inform optimal sourcing strategies for biobanking and outplanting, we also reanalyze genomic data to explore how the number of individuals sampled impacts retention of genetic diversity. In many cases, predictions derived from molecular data and models have accumulated faster than the research community’s ability to validate them in the field. We propose that experimental tests be incorporated into ongoing kelp management operations as an immediate step in transitioning toward a management framework informed by population genomic data and perspectives. Adopting such a framework will improve the likelihood of attaining desirable outcomes in kelp conservation and aquaculture, including as kelp populations adapt to future challenges. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2JQ16 Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Evolution, Genetics and Genomics, Genomics, Life Sciences, Marine Biology kelp, population genomics, conservation genomics, restoration biology, aquaculture, wild harvest, biobanking Published: 2026-04-01 23:00 Last Updated: 2026-04-04 04:24 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Data and Code Availability Statement: Raw genome sequencing data were previously published and are available at NCBI (NCBI SRA: PRJNA1164249; only Nereocystis samples not subject to a Biocultural Notice were reanalyzed in this study). Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00