How cancer patients perceive clinical trials (CTs) in the era of CTs: Current perceptional status and differences between common and rare cancers
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Background As perception have been recently highlighted as critical determinants of clinical trials (CTs) in cancer patients, we evaluated current perceptional status of CTs in cancer patients, focusing on differences between common and rare cancers. Materials & Methods From November 2015 to May 2017, we prospectively surveyed patients who have received anti-cancer treatment at Asan Medical Center using the PARTAKE questionnaires. Results Among 333 respondents, 70.9% and 29.1% had common and rare cancers, respectively. While 87.7% and 75.3% of patients answered that they heard of and knew about CTs, willingness to participate in CTs was expressed only in approximately 56% of patients although willingness was significantly correlated with awareness and perception. Surprisingly, patients with rare cancers showed significantly lower levels of awareness and perception (64.2% vs 79.9%, p=0.003 and 77.3% vs 91.9%, p<0.001), and consequently less willingness (47.4% vs 58.9%, p=0.06) compared to patients with common cancers. In addition, cancer patients still harbored fear with concerns about safety and reward, and substantial ignorance and mistrust about voluntariness of CTs, which was more predominant in patients with rare cancers. Conclusions Present study identified relatively less willingness of CTs in cancer patients compared with generally favorable perception, and highlighted relative perceptional poverty in patients with rare cancers than those with common cancers. Further education and encouragement by research and public entities seem essential to raise motivation of CTs in cancer patients beyond good perception, especially for the patients with rare cancers.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00