Abstract
This paper examines the _Dao_ (道) as a fundamental principle in Chinese philosophy, underscoring its role as the source and guiding force behind the harmonious interaction of _yin_ (陰) and _yang_ (陽) and the _wuxing_ (五行) or five elements. The _Dao_ shapes the natural world and informs moral, philosophical, and cosmological thought, providing a holistic framework for understanding life and the cosmos. This integration of _yin-yang_ theory offers a conceptual foundation for Chinese natural science while establishing a theoretical and practical basis for the broader Chinese worldview. The study further explores fields and forces, focusing on the relationship between potentiality and actuality within a scientific framework. By translating traditional concepts rooted in _yin-yang_ and _wuxing_ into modern scientific discourse, the research aims to bridge ancient wisdom with contemporary understandings of space, time, and force, demonstrating these ideas' ongoing relevance in explaining the universe's dynamics. Additionally, the paper discusses Roger Penrose’s twistor theory, which proposes that space and time emerge from a deeper, more fundamental level of reality. This concept resonates with _qi_ (氣), an underlying force orchestrating existence. The paper draws parallels between twistors and _qi_, suggesting that both frameworks propose a universe shaped by deeper, interconnected processes. The research also compares the concept of _yun_ (運) in Chinese philosophy, expressed in this paper as a vital carrier field akin to bosonic properties, with the Higgs field in physics, emphasizing the parallels between _yin_-_yang_ duality and the symmetry-breaking processes in particle physics. This interdisciplinary study seeks to reconcile Eastern philosophical traditions with Western scientific theories, offering a nuanced understanding of reality that enriches ancient and modern paradigms. Through this dialogue, the paper contributes to a deeper appreciation of how traditional insights can inform contemporary scientific thought.
Full text
621 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version
{{ publication.field_name }}
{{ publication.subfield_name }}
Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information.
Listen on
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.