Identifying the causes and consequences of assembly gaps using a multiplatform genome assembly of a bird-of-paradise

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Genome assemblies are currently being produced at an impressive rate by consortia and individual laboratories. The low costs and increasing efficiency of sequencing technologies have opened up a whole new world of genomic biodiversity. Although these technologies generate high-quality genome assemblies, there are still genomic regions difficult to assemble, like repetitive elements and GC-rich regions (genomic “dark matter”). In this study, we compare the efficiency of currently used sequencing technologies (short/linked/long reads and proximity ligation maps) and combinations thereof in assembling genomic dark matter starting from the same sample. By adopting different de-novo assembly strategies, we were able to compare each individual draft assembly to a curated multiplatform one and identify the nature of the previously missing dark matter with a particular focus on transposable elements, multi-copy MHC genes, and GC-rich regions. Thanks to this multiplatform approach, we demonstrate the feasibility of producing a high-quality chromosome-level assembly for a non-model organism (paradise crow) for which only suboptimal samples are available. Our approach was able to reconstruct complex chromosomes like the repeat-rich W sex chromosome and several GC-rich microchromosomes. Telomere-to-telomere assemblies are not a reality yet for most organisms, but by leveraging technology choice it is possible to minimize genome assembly gaps for downstream analysis. We provide a roadmap to tailor sequencing projects around the completeness of both the coding and non-coding parts of the genomes.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00