Management of Severe COVID-19 Diagnosis Using Machine Learning
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
For Machine Learning (ML) analysis, we utilized a dataset comprising 226 observations with 68 clinical, biochemical, and genetic features collected from 257 patients with confirmed COVID-19 (197 with moderate-to-severe disease and 60 with mild disease). The feature set included demographic variables (age, sex), genetic markers (single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in FGB (rs1800790), NOS3 (rs2070744), and TMPRSS2 (rs12329760)), biochemical indicators (IL-6, endothelin-1, D-dimer, fibrinogen, among others), and clinical parameters (blood pressure, body mass index, comorbidities). The target variable was disease severity. To identify the most effective predictive models for COVID-19 severity, we systematically evaluated multiple supervised learning algorithms, including logistic regression, k-nearest neighbors, decision trees, random forest, gradient boosting, bagging, naïve Bayes, and support vector machines. Model performance was assessed using accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). Among the predictors, IL-6, presence of depression/pneumonia, LDL cholesterol, AST, platelet count, lymphocyte count, and ALT showed the strongest correlations with severity. The highest predictive accuracy, with negligible error rates, was achieved by ensemble-based models such as ExtraTreesClassifier, HistGradientBoostingClassifier, BaggingClassifier, and GradientBoostingClassifier. Notably, decision tree models demonstrated high classification precision at terminal nodes, many of which yielded a 100% probability for a specific severity class.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00