Healthome Polygon Framework: A Comprehensive and Multidimensional Health Quantification Framework Using Artificial Intelligence and Multiomics Data

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03 · read from full text

The provided text does not include the paper’s substantive content (study aims, population, methods, results, or limitations), only a template-like header and licensing statements about the “Healthome Polygon Framework” using AI and multiomics data. Because the actual abstract/body is missing, no key findings or explicit caveats stated by the authors can be reliably extracted. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quantifying human health and disease necessitates a transformative framework capable of integrating diverse biomedical data in a standardized manner. Such a system could enable precise preemptive health and disease prevention through the application of artificial intelligence. OBJECTIVES: We propose a novel health quantification framework using Pseudo Super Healthy (PSH) subjects—virtual optimal health conditions, and the Multi-Omics Health Index (MOHI) which consolidates health scores across eight “omes”: Physiome, Metabolome, Vasculome, Inflammatome, Immunome, Psycholome, Transcriptome, and Epigenome. METHODS: PSH subjects were identified using algorithmic or clinical domain knowledge-based methods in the first five omes, utilizing data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the Korean Genome Project (KGP). Individual health status in these omes was quantified using Euclidean distances (ED) from PSH subjects. For the last three omes, machine learning (ML) models trained on KGP data predicted individual health probabilities. RESULTS: PSH subjects were stratified by age and sex. In two available case studies—a male in his mid-50s and a female in her mid-30s—their MOHI scores were 30 and 49, respectively. ED-based health indicators correlated significantly with the Number of Abnormal Traits (NATs) in Physiome (Pearson’s r = 0.62 for males, 0.70 for females, _P_ < 0.001). Three ML models used to quantify health for the Psycholome, Transcriptome, and Epigenome achieved area under the curve values of 0.79, 0.85, and 0.96, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Individual health can be represented by a radar chart (Healthome Polygon) derived from PSH subjects and ML models, resulting in MOHI scores that serve as a personalized health quantification metric.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00