Effects of Bimodal Olfactory and Mechanosensory Inputs in the Antennal Lobe of the Honeybee Apis mellifera

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Animals often aggregate information from multiple different sensory modalities to accurately assess and react to a stimulus. It is often assumed that cross-modality integration mostly occurs at high-level processing centers, such as the mammalian cortex or insect mushroom bodies. However, we hypothesized that integration could occur relatively early in the sensory pathways. The insect antennal lobe is one such location, receiving direct inputs from the antennae via the antennal nerve. These inputs are highly multimodal, including olfactory, mechanosesnory, and gustatory information, all of which are relevant to foraging honeybees ( Apis mellifera ). Here we assess integration by recording electrophysiological spike data within the honeybee antennal lobe while exposing the bee to various combinations of wind speed and odor concentration. This paper accompanies another publication by Joseph Reed and Mainak Patel approaching the same question from a modelling perspective, where their model corroborates our data and vice versa. Together, we show that integration occurs within this early layer of processing, while also demonstrating the complex relationship of these two closely-linked stimuli. SIGNIFICANCE Accurate perception depends on the brain’s ability to combine information from multiple senses, commonly thought belonging to high level of information processing. Using the European honeybee, Apis mellifera , we show strong evidence that olfactory and mechanosensory signals interact at an early stage of neural processing, within the antennal lobe, producing stimulus representations closely-linked to the animal’s navigation and decision-making. By identifying a tractable model for early multisensory processing, this work offers broader insight into how animals construct reliable representations of their environment.
Full text 1,928 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Animals often aggregate information from multiple different sensory modalities to accurately assess and react to a stimulus. It is often assumed that cross-modality integration mostly occurs at high-level processing centers, such as the mammalian cortex or insect mushroom bodies. However, we hypothesized that integration could occur relatively early in the sensory pathways. The insect antennal lobe is one such location, receiving direct inputs from the antennae via the antennal nerve. These inputs are highly multimodal, including olfactory, mechanosesnory, and gustatory information, all of which are relevant to foraging honeybees (Apis mellifera). Here we assess integration by recording electrophysiological spike data within the honeybee antennal lobe while exposing the bee to various combinations of wind speed and odor concentration. This paper accompanies another publication by Joseph Reed and Mainak Patel approaching the same question from a modelling perspective, where their model corroborates our data and vice versa. Together, we show that integration occurs within this early layer of processing, while also demonstrating the complex relationship of these two closely-linked stimuli. SIGNIFICANCE Accurate perception depends on the brain’s ability to combine information from multiple senses, commonly thought belonging to high level of information processing. Using the European honeybee, Apis mellifera, we show strong evidence that olfactory and mechanosensory signals interact at an early stage of neural processing, within the antennal lobe, producing stimulus representations closely-linked to the animal’s navigation and decision-making. By identifying a tractable model for early multisensory processing, this work offers broader insight into how animals construct reliable representations of their environment. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00