Integrated analysis reveals strong reproducible signals within and across studies of the built environment

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06 · read from full text

This study evaluated reproducibility in built-environment microbiome research by applying a simple sample ontology (hand, hand-associated surfaces, and floor) to four publicly available 16S rRNA datasets spanning a hospital, university dormitory, Air Force dormitory, and private residences. Across timepoints and between studies, floors showed consistent enrichment of soil-associated taxa while hands and hand-associated surfaces were enriched with skin-associated genera, and mixed-model PERMANOVA indicated significant clustering by sample type with only modest study effects; leave-one-study-out random forest classifiers performed well for hand-versus-floor separation. A key caveat is that the authors note cross-study challenges from differences in sampling design and sequencing, yet batch correction with DEBIAS-M did not improve effect sizes or classification performance, implying the reproducible structure was already evident without it. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background Built environment microbiome studies have identified numerous factors that shape indoor microbiomes, yet the reproducibility of these findings across buildings, timepoints, and research groups remains unclear. Differences in sequencing protocols, sampling design, and environments pose major challenges for cross-study comparisons, particularly in low-biomass environments where technical variation can obscure biological signal. To address this gap, we constructed a simple ontology which groups samples into one of three categories: hand, hand-associated surfaces, and floor then applied it to four publicly available 16S rRNA gene datasets: a hospital, university dormitory, Air Force dormitory, and private residential houses. Results We identified strong and reproducible separation between floors and surfaces with frequent human contact. We found that floors consistently harbored soil-associated taxa, including KD4-96, 67-14, Skermanella, and Sphingobacterium , whereas hands and hand-associated surfaces were enriched with skin-associated genera, such as Lawsonella and Cutibacterium . Within studies, these results were generally consistent across timepoints. Across studies, mixed-model PERMANOVA analysis revealed significant clustering by sample type, with modest effects of study, suggesting that biological signal outweighed differences in laboratory or sequencing methods. Leave-one-study-out random forest models achieved high AUCs for hand vs. floor comparisons (0.865 to 0.921), moderate AUCs for hand-associated vs. floor comparisons, and weaker performance for hand vs. hand-associated comparisons. Application of the batch-correction method DEBIAS-M did not improve effect sizes or classification performance, indicating that reproducible structure was already discernible without batch adjustment. Conclusions Despite substantial temporal and environmental heterogeneity among studies, we found that the built environment microbiome has a reproducible bacterial signal. There was consistent enrichment of soil-derived taxa on floors and human-associated taxa on hands and hand-associated surfaces suggesting a stable microbiome despite differences in building type, occupancy, and methodology. These findings establish an important foundation for future studies, suggesting cross-study comparability, the accuracy of ecological inference, and the ability to support the development of predictive applications in indoor microbiome research.
Full text 2,711 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Built environment microbiome studies have identified numerous factors that shape indoor microbiomes, yet the reproducibility of these findings across buildings, timepoints, and research groups remains unclear. Differences in sequencing protocols, sampling design, and environments pose major challenges for cross-study comparisons, particularly in low-biomass environments where technical variation can obscure biological signal. To address this gap, we constructed a simple ontology which groups samples into one of three categories: hand, hand-associated surfaces, and floor then applied it to four publicly available 16S rRNA gene datasets: a hospital, university dormitory, Air Force dormitory, and private residential houses.

Results

We identified strong and reproducible separation between floors and surfaces with frequent human contact. We found that floors consistently harbored soil-associated taxa, including KD4-96, 67-14, Skermanella, and Sphingobacterium, whereas hands and hand-associated surfaces were enriched with skin-associated genera, such as Lawsonella and Cutibacterium. Within studies, these results were generally consistent across timepoints. Across studies, mixed-model PERMANOVA analysis revealed significant clustering by sample type, with modest effects of study, suggesting that biological signal outweighed differences in laboratory or sequencing methods. Leave-one-study-out random forest models achieved high AUCs for hand vs. floor comparisons (0.865 to 0.921), moderate AUCs for hand-associated vs. floor comparisons, and weaker performance for hand vs. hand-associated comparisons. Application of the batch-correction method DEBIAS-M did not improve effect sizes or classification performance, indicating that reproducible structure was already discernible without batch adjustment.

Conclusions

Despite substantial temporal and environmental heterogeneity among studies, we found that the built environment microbiome has a reproducible bacterial signal. There was consistent enrichment of soil-derived taxa on floors and human-associated taxa on hands and hand-associated surfaces suggesting a stable microbiome despite differences in building type, occupancy, and methodology. These findings establish an important foundation for future studies, suggesting cross-study comparability, the accuracy of ecological inference, and the ability to support the development of predictive applications in indoor microbiome research. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. List of abbreviations - LOSO - leave-one-study-out - PCoA - Principal Coordinate Analysis - PERMANOVA - Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00