Noise Reduction in Infodemic Management: Lessons from the January 2026 Nipah Virus Event in India

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The rapid spread of misinformation during infectious disease events, termed an infodemic, poses significant challenges to public health response. In January 2026, two confirmed cases of Nipah virus disease in West Bengal, India, triggered disproportionate regional and international reactions, including travel screening measures and widespread public anxiety. Despite the absence of secondary transmission (196 contacts tested negative), misinformation across social media and news platforms amplified perceived risk. This short communication analyses the discrepancy between epidemiological reality and information amplification and proposes a structured “noise reduction” framework for epidemic intelligence. Key gaps identified include 14-days delays in official communication, limited engagement with high-velocity social media platforms, and insufficient contextualization of risk. Strengthening infodemic management through rapid communication, multi-platform communication, and real-time information surveillance is essential for effective outbreak control in the digital era.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00